Supreme Court Introduces Professional Bail Bondsperson Rules 2026 To Curb Rampant Fake Sureties Supreme Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines For Foreign Nationals In NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases, Mandates Passport Deposition And Strict Surety Verification Supreme Court Issues Mandatory Guidelines To Curb Black Money In Elections, Directs Fast-Track Disposal Of Criminal Cases Against MPs And MLAs Same Set of Depositions Cannot Lead to Conviction of Some Accused and Acquittal of Others Without Distinct Reasoning: Supreme Court Victims Have Equal Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial: Supreme Court Section 12 Of Gangsters Act Does Not Freeze Other Parallel Proceedings, Its Sole Purpose Is To Resolve Clash Of Dates: Supreme Court Registration of a Will Does Not Dispense With Mandatory Proof of Execution and Attestation Under Section 68 of Evidence Act: Supreme Court Arbitration Pre-Deposit Clause Requiring Contractor To Deposit 10% Of Claim Amount Prior To Reference Violates Right To Sue And Article 14: Supreme Court Income Tax Settlement Order Passed Beyond Mandatory 18-Month Limitation Period Is Void, Rules Allahabad High Court Teacher's Abuse of Trust is Grave Concern, Not Mere Breach of Discipline: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction, Raps School Principal For Discouraging Child Victim 'NO AID OF INTERPRETER, NO VIDEOGRAPHY': Gauhati High Court Acquits Man In Rape Case Involving Mentally Disabled Victim, Rules S.164 CrPC Statement Inadmissible Due To Procedural Non-Compliance Karnataka High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Refund of Trap Money to Complainants Property Purchased Jointly By Husband And Wife Cannot Be Regarded As Ancestral Merely Because Co-Executants Signed Prior Sale Deed: Madras High Court Judicial Magistrate Holding Section 176(1A) CrPC Inquiry Is Empowered To Name Perpetrators Of Custodial Death: Madhya Pradesh High Court 'Mere Maintenance Order Cannot Prove Marriage Validity': Patna High Court Declares Woman Not Legally Wedded Wife For Failing To Prove 'Saptapadi' Under Hindu Marriage Act Woman Accused Under PMLA Is Exempt From Twin Conditions But Bail Depends On Facts, Not Gender Alone: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Man After One Year in Jail, Bars Social Media Contact with Complainant

08 October 2024 10:32 AM

By: sayum


"Appellant Abhishek must not upload any photos of the complainant or contact her through any medium," ruled the Court, ensuring strict conditions during the bail period. "Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the period of incarceration suffered of nearly one year, we accept the present appeal and direct that the appellant Abhishek will be released on bail during the pendency of the trial."

Supreme Court of India delivered its judgment in the case of Abhishek vs The State of Madhya Pradesh (Criminal Appeal No. 910/2024). The case revolved around charges filed under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Information Technology Act, 2000. The Court allowed the appellant Abhishek's appeal for bail, setting aside the lower court's order.

The case originated from a First Information Report (FIR) filed on September 30, 2022, under Crime No. 449/2022. The allegations against Abhishek included offenses punishable under Sections 377 (unnatural offenses), 498A (cruelty by husband), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 34 (common intention) of the IPC, as well as Sections 66E and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. These charges were filed following a marital dispute that arose after the appellant had filed for divorce. The complainant, who was known to the appellant before marriage, accused him of various offenses, including the misuse of electronic files, which Abhishek disputed.

The Court examined the legal question of whether the appellant, who had already spent nearly a year in incarceration, should be granted bail while the trial continued. The bench, comprising Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar, acknowledged the serious nature of the allegations but also took into account the length of the appellant’s imprisonment.

In addition to ordering bail, the Court emphasized strict conditions:

Abhishek must submit his passport to the trial court.

He is prohibited from leaving India without permission from the trial court.

He must provide his contact number to the Investigating Officer and ensure his availability during the trial.

Abhishek is barred from contacting the complainant or her family members, either physically or through social media.

He is forbidden from uploading or sharing any photographs of the complainant.

Conclusion and Impact

The Supreme Court granted Abhishek bail while clearly stating that its observations pertained only to the question of bail and would not influence the final determination of the case. The trial will proceed based on the evidence presented, ensuring a fair judicial process.

Date of Decision: October 1, 2024

Abhishek vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

 

Latest Legal News