Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Supreme Court Encourages Amicable Resolution in Matrimonial Disputes: Multiple Cases Quashed

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of India emphasized the importance of amicably resolving matrimonial disputes and encouraged parties to bring an end to prolonged legal battles. The case, involving Gaurav Garg and Shweta Agarwal, had a staggering 21 cases filed by one party or the other. Despite failed mediation attempts, the Court's intervention paved the way for a resolution.

In a significant observation, the Court stated, "We appreciate the advice rendered by the counsels to the parties which has been adopted by the parties in Court and they have agreed to resolve all their disputes." This observation underscores the Court's commitment to promoting peaceful solutions in family disputes.

- A decree of divorce dated 24.01.2023 had already been passed, but the petitioner chose not to challenge it further, signaling a willingness to end the matter.

- Both parties agreed to a lump-sum alimony payment of Rs. 30 lakhs, settling all claims for maintenance and stridhan.

- Visiting rights for the child, a contentious issue, were resolved with initial supervised visits, gradually transitioning to unsupervised interactions.

- All civil cases between the parties were withdrawn, and criminal proceedings were quashed.

The Court's decision not only brings relief to the parties involved but also sets a precedent for the importance of amicable dispute resolution in family matters. It highlights the significance of mediation and cooperation, even when couples cannot live together.

Advocates on both sides, including Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, and others, played pivotal roles in reaching this resolution. The Court's observation serves as a reminder that harmonious solutions can often be found in even the most complex of family disputes.

Date of Decision: September 22, 2023

GAURAV GARG vs SHWETA AGARWAL & ORS.ETC.     

Latest Legal News