CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Supreme Court Emphasizes Distinction Between Civil and Criminal Disputes in Bail Applications: “Civil Disputes Should Not Be Converted Into Criminal Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India today granted anticipatory bail to appellants Jay Shri and Hitesh Kela in a case involving allegations under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta presided over the case, highlighting crucial guidelines for bail applications and drawing a clear line between civil and criminal disputes.

The apex court, in its order, underscored the importance of distinguishing between civil disputes and criminal offences. The bench, referring to past judgments, stated, “Civil disputes should not be converted into criminal cases.” This observation aligns with the court’s longstanding caution against the misuse of criminal prosecution in matters that essentially fall within the ambit of civil disputes.

The appellants, implicated in an FIR registered at Police Station – Osiyan, District – Jodhpur Rural, Rajasthan, were accused of offenses punishable under Sections 420 (Cheating) and 120B (Criminal Conspiracy) of the IPC. The Supreme Court, in its order, noted, “Mere breach of contract does not amount to an offence under Section 420 or Section 406 of the IPC, unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction.”

This judgment is seen as a reinforcement of the legal principle that anticipatory bail can be granted in cases where the dispute primarily stems from a civil matter, rather than a criminal one. The court directed that the appellants shall be released on bail if arrested, subject to conditions fixed by the trial court and compliance with conditions mentioned in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The court further clarified that the observations made in the order are not to be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case and shall have no bearing on any civil proceeding(s). This clarification aims to maintain the sanctity and independence of civil proceedings, irrespective of the criminal case outcomes.

Date of Decision: 19th January 2024

JAY SHRI & ANR.  VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN

 

Latest Legal News