Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Supreme Court Emphasizes Distinction Between Civil and Criminal Disputes in Bail Applications: “Civil Disputes Should Not Be Converted Into Criminal Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India today granted anticipatory bail to appellants Jay Shri and Hitesh Kela in a case involving allegations under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta presided over the case, highlighting crucial guidelines for bail applications and drawing a clear line between civil and criminal disputes.

The apex court, in its order, underscored the importance of distinguishing between civil disputes and criminal offences. The bench, referring to past judgments, stated, “Civil disputes should not be converted into criminal cases.” This observation aligns with the court’s longstanding caution against the misuse of criminal prosecution in matters that essentially fall within the ambit of civil disputes.

The appellants, implicated in an FIR registered at Police Station – Osiyan, District – Jodhpur Rural, Rajasthan, were accused of offenses punishable under Sections 420 (Cheating) and 120B (Criminal Conspiracy) of the IPC. The Supreme Court, in its order, noted, “Mere breach of contract does not amount to an offence under Section 420 or Section 406 of the IPC, unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction.”

This judgment is seen as a reinforcement of the legal principle that anticipatory bail can be granted in cases where the dispute primarily stems from a civil matter, rather than a criminal one. The court directed that the appellants shall be released on bail if arrested, subject to conditions fixed by the trial court and compliance with conditions mentioned in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The court further clarified that the observations made in the order are not to be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case and shall have no bearing on any civil proceeding(s). This clarification aims to maintain the sanctity and independence of civil proceedings, irrespective of the criminal case outcomes.

Date of Decision: 19th January 2024

JAY SHRI & ANR.  VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN

 

Latest Legal News