Lack Of Boundaries In Sale Deed Not Fatal To Title If Plot Number & Parent Title Are Sufficiently Identifiable: Calcutta High Court Terror Perception Of Underworld Justifies Delay In Invoking MCOCA; Purely Civil Disputes Can Metamorphose Into Criminal Offence: Bombay High Court Identical Wills Executed By Spouses On Same Day Not Necessarily 'Mutual Wills' Restricting Power Of Alienation: Delhi High Court Written Notice Not Mandatory For Revoking Permission Under Section 41 Presidency Small Cause Courts Act: Gujarat High Court Wife Cannot Maintain Complaint Against Husband Under Senior Citizens Act; Not Intended For Spousal Disputes: Karnataka High Court Mere Presence At Scene Or Facilitation Without Intent To Aid Crime Does Not Amount To Abetment: Delhi High Court Offences Under IT Act Punishable With 3 Years Imprisonment Are Bailable Under Section 77B: Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail In KCA Data Theft Case Premature Release Can't Be Denied Citing Section 435 CrPC If Sentence Under Central Act Is Already Served: Madras High Court Suppression Of Higher Qualification To Secure Job Reserved For Lower Education Is Foundational Fraud, Sympathy Has No Role: Supreme Court MBBS Admissions | Candidate Using NIOS Marks To Meet 50% Eligibility Cannot Claim State Govt School Quota: Orissa High Court High Court Cannot Exercise Article 227 Power To Strike Off Plaint When Remedy Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Exists: Madras High Court Section 69 IEA | Onus On Propounder To Lead Secondary Evidence & Remove Suspicious Circumstances If Attesting Witnesses Are Dead: Telangana High Court

Setoff U/Sec 428 CrPC only applies if the convict's detention is in the' same case'- Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court, the advantage of Section 428 CrPC can only be used if the convict was detained throughout the same investigation, inquiry, or trial.

According to Section 428 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the accused's detention time may be deducted from their sentence or length of incarceration. The period of detention, if any, experienced by the accused during the investigation, inquiry, or trial of the same case and prior to the date of such conviction shall be set off against the term of imprisonment imposed on him on such conviction, and the liability of such person to undergo imprisonment on such conviction, the law states.

On September 22, 2022, Shivinder Mohan Singh was found guilty of contempt of court and given a six-month prison term. In his miscellaneous application, he argued that, as of the date he was brought to the Supreme Court from Jail No. 7, Tihar Jail, New Delhi, he was already being held in custody in connection with another case. He requested clarification in order that the six (Six) month sentence be judged to have started on February 3, 2020, rather than September 22, 2020. It was decided to rely on Section 428 CrPC.

The court denied his request for the incarceration he was subjected to in connection with another case to be treated as the confinement he was subjected to in the contempt of court case, noting the requirements of Section 428 CrPC and relevant case law in the process.

Vinay Prakash Singh vs Sameer Gehlaut

Latest Legal News