Plaintiff In Title Suit Must Prove Own Case On Independent Evidence, Cannot Rely On Weakness Of Defence: Supreme Court Advocate Commissioner's Failure To Localize Land Per Title Deeds Fatal To Encroachment Claim: Andhra Pradesh High Court Enmity Is A Double-Edged Weapon, Can Be Motive For False Implication As Much As For Crime: Allahabad High Court Parity In Bail: Karnataka High Court Grants Relief To Accused In Robbery Case As Mastermind & Main Offenders Were Already Enlarged Specific Performance Denied If Buyer Fails To Prove Continuous Readiness With Funds; Part-Payment Can't Be Forfeited Without Specific Clause: Delhi High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept In Police Stations For Long, Courts Must Judiciously Exercise Power To Release On Supurdagi: Madhya Pradesh High Court Prolonged Incarceration Militates Against Article 21, Constitutional Principles Must Override Section 37 NDPS Rigors: Punjab & Haryana High Court Onus On Individual To Prove Claim Of 'Fear Of Religious Persecution' For Exemption Under Foreigners Act: Calcutta High Court Direct Recruits Cannot Claim Seniority From A Date Prior To Their Entry Into The Cadre: Orissa High Court Sale Deed Executed After Land Vests In State Confers No Title; Post-Vesting Purchaser Can’t Claim Compensation: Calcutta High Court No Right To Blanket Regularization For Contractual Staff; State Must Timely Fill Sanctioned Vacancies Under Reserved Quota: Supreme Court Non-Signatory Collaborator Under 'Deed Of Joint Undertaking' Can Invoke Arbitration Clause As A 'Veritable Party': Supreme Court Insolvency Proceedings Cannot Be Used As Coercive Recovery Mechanism For Complex Contractual Disputes: Supreme Court Legal Heirs Who Were Parties To Sale Cannot Challenge Transfer Under PTCL Act After Long Delay: Supreme Court SC/ST Act | Proceedings To Annul Sale Illegal If Initiated By Legal Heirs Who Were Parties To The Transaction: Supreme Court Consumers Cannot Be Burdened With Tariff Charges Beyond Period Of Service Delivery: Supreme Court Mere Non-Production Of Old Selection Records Or Non-Publication Of All Candidates' Marks No Ground To Direct Appointment: Supreme Court

Setoff U/Sec 428 CrPC only applies if the convict's detention is in the' same case'- Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court, the advantage of Section 428 CrPC can only be used if the convict was detained throughout the same investigation, inquiry, or trial.

According to Section 428 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the accused's detention time may be deducted from their sentence or length of incarceration. The period of detention, if any, experienced by the accused during the investigation, inquiry, or trial of the same case and prior to the date of such conviction shall be set off against the term of imprisonment imposed on him on such conviction, and the liability of such person to undergo imprisonment on such conviction, the law states.

On September 22, 2022, Shivinder Mohan Singh was found guilty of contempt of court and given a six-month prison term. In his miscellaneous application, he argued that, as of the date he was brought to the Supreme Court from Jail No. 7, Tihar Jail, New Delhi, he was already being held in custody in connection with another case. He requested clarification in order that the six (Six) month sentence be judged to have started on February 3, 2020, rather than September 22, 2020. It was decided to rely on Section 428 CrPC.

The court denied his request for the incarceration he was subjected to in connection with another case to be treated as the confinement he was subjected to in the contempt of court case, noting the requirements of Section 428 CrPC and relevant case law in the process.

Vinay Prakash Singh vs Sameer Gehlaut

Latest Legal News