Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

Serious Investigation Irregularities Don't Affect Trial Competence Unless Causing Miscarriage of Justice: Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Kerala High Court has dismissed the Criminal Revision Petitions filed by the accused in the Azheekkal Port dredging contract case, thereby upholding the trial court's dismissal of their discharge applications. The judgment was delivered by the Honorable Mr. Justice K. Babu, who observed, "A defect or irregularity in investigation, however serious, would have no direct bearing on the competence or procedure relating to cognizance or trial unless a miscarriage of justice has been caused thereby."

The case, CRL.REV.PET NO. 691 OF 2021 and CRL.REV.PET NO. 65 OF 2022, involved allegations of criminal conspiracy and corruption under Sections 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and Section 120-B of the IPC. The accused were implicated in a scheme that reportedly resulted in a loss of Rs.3,20,000/- to the public exchequer through irregularities in granting permits for the disposal of dredged materials from Azheekkal Port.

One of the critical aspects of the case was the competence of the Investigating Officer. The court noted, “The major part of the investigation was done by the Inspector of Police, VACB, Kannur...as per Notification No.12094/C1/88/Vig dated 02.03.1993, the Government of Kerala authorized police officers not below the rank of an Inspector of Police to investigate any offence punishable under the said Act.” This notification was upheld by the court, thus validating the investigation conducted.

The court meticulously analyzed the evidence and allegations, emphasizing the standard for discharge under Section 239 Cr.P.C. The court's observation, “The primary consideration at the stage of framing charge is the test of the existence of a prima facie case,” highlighted the necessity to proceed to trial based on the materials presented.

In its conclusion, the court found that the charges against the accused were not groundless and required a full trial for further examination. The dismissal of the Criminal Revision Petitions signifies a crucial step in the judicial process, ensuring that the allegations of corruption and conspiracy in the Azheekkal Port case will be thoroughly scrutinized during the trial.

Date of Decision: 17 January 2024

P.P. FAROOQUE VS Deputy Superintendent of Police

Latest Legal News