Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Securing Presence of Accused is Paramount: High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Proclaimed Offender in Cheque Bounce Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court underlined the importance of securing the presence of an accused for the smooth conduct of the trial. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjay Vashisth, while disposing of the anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., stated that "the paramount consideration of the Court is to secure the presence of accused."

Kulwant Singh, a 56-year-old man, had been declared a 'proclaimed offender' for a bailable & non-cognizable offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Singh's counsel argued that he had "no knowledge of the pendency of the complaint," as neither notice nor warrants were served upon him. In response, the Court noted that "By issuing bailable warrant or non-bailable warrants or proclamation orders, nothing material is achieved by anybody or even the prosecution agency, except of wastage of time and energy."

The State, represented by Mr. C.L. Pawar, Addl. AG, Punjab, objected to any leniency, asserting that the petitioner should be "dealt with sternly in accordance with law." Nevertheless, the Court considered the primary objective to be securing the accused's presence for the trial.

The Court directed Kulwant Singh to appear before the Trial Court on or before November 9, 2023. Upon his appearance, he will be released on bail after furnishing appropriate bonds. Additionally, Singh is required to deposit an amount of Rs. 20,000 for the treatment of poor patients in a specified Rajpura hospital as a condition for bail.

Furthermore, Singh has been instructed to submit an undertaking or affidavit committing to consistent appearances during the trial and assuring that the proceedings will not be delayed due to his conduct.

This judgment serves as a pertinent reminder of the judicial emphasis on securing the presence of the accused for fair and expeditious trials, over and above the routine issuance of warrants and proclamations.

Date of Decision: October 26, 2023

Kulwant Singh VS State of Punjab and another  

Latest Legal News