Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Securing Presence of Accused is Paramount: High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Proclaimed Offender in Cheque Bounce Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court underlined the importance of securing the presence of an accused for the smooth conduct of the trial. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjay Vashisth, while disposing of the anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., stated that "the paramount consideration of the Court is to secure the presence of accused."

Kulwant Singh, a 56-year-old man, had been declared a 'proclaimed offender' for a bailable & non-cognizable offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Singh's counsel argued that he had "no knowledge of the pendency of the complaint," as neither notice nor warrants were served upon him. In response, the Court noted that "By issuing bailable warrant or non-bailable warrants or proclamation orders, nothing material is achieved by anybody or even the prosecution agency, except of wastage of time and energy."

The State, represented by Mr. C.L. Pawar, Addl. AG, Punjab, objected to any leniency, asserting that the petitioner should be "dealt with sternly in accordance with law." Nevertheless, the Court considered the primary objective to be securing the accused's presence for the trial.

The Court directed Kulwant Singh to appear before the Trial Court on or before November 9, 2023. Upon his appearance, he will be released on bail after furnishing appropriate bonds. Additionally, Singh is required to deposit an amount of Rs. 20,000 for the treatment of poor patients in a specified Rajpura hospital as a condition for bail.

Furthermore, Singh has been instructed to submit an undertaking or affidavit committing to consistent appearances during the trial and assuring that the proceedings will not be delayed due to his conduct.

This judgment serves as a pertinent reminder of the judicial emphasis on securing the presence of the accused for fair and expeditious trials, over and above the routine issuance of warrants and proclamations.

Date of Decision: October 26, 2023

Kulwant Singh VS State of Punjab and another  

Latest Legal News