Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Securing Presence of Accused is Paramount: High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Proclaimed Offender in Cheque Bounce Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court underlined the importance of securing the presence of an accused for the smooth conduct of the trial. The Hon'ble Justice Sanjay Vashisth, while disposing of the anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., stated that "the paramount consideration of the Court is to secure the presence of accused."

Kulwant Singh, a 56-year-old man, had been declared a 'proclaimed offender' for a bailable & non-cognizable offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Singh's counsel argued that he had "no knowledge of the pendency of the complaint," as neither notice nor warrants were served upon him. In response, the Court noted that "By issuing bailable warrant or non-bailable warrants or proclamation orders, nothing material is achieved by anybody or even the prosecution agency, except of wastage of time and energy."

The State, represented by Mr. C.L. Pawar, Addl. AG, Punjab, objected to any leniency, asserting that the petitioner should be "dealt with sternly in accordance with law." Nevertheless, the Court considered the primary objective to be securing the accused's presence for the trial.

The Court directed Kulwant Singh to appear before the Trial Court on or before November 9, 2023. Upon his appearance, he will be released on bail after furnishing appropriate bonds. Additionally, Singh is required to deposit an amount of Rs. 20,000 for the treatment of poor patients in a specified Rajpura hospital as a condition for bail.

Furthermore, Singh has been instructed to submit an undertaking or affidavit committing to consistent appearances during the trial and assuring that the proceedings will not be delayed due to his conduct.

This judgment serves as a pertinent reminder of the judicial emphasis on securing the presence of the accused for fair and expeditious trials, over and above the routine issuance of warrants and proclamations.

Date of Decision: October 26, 2023

Kulwant Singh VS State of Punjab and another  

Latest Legal News