Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

SARFASI Act: High Court of Kerala Grants Relief to Borrower, Orders Repayment in Installments Amidst COVID-19 Hardships

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Kerala, presided over by Justice N. Nagares, granted relief to a borrower facing coercive recovery proceedings for loans availed from Kerala Bank. The petitioner, Anil Kumar G., had approached the court aggrieved by the bank's recovery actions under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

Justice Nagares, in his observation, empathized with the borrower's situation, acknowledging that "the default in repayment occurred lately due to reasons beyond the control of the petitioner" [Para 9]. The court recognized the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the petitioner's financial ability to repay the loans.

Anil Kumar had availed various loans from Kerala Bank between 2011 and 2022. He faced difficulties in repaying due to the pandemic and sought to arrange the repayment of overdue amounts in monthly installments. However, the bank initiated coercive proceedings, leading him to seek judicial intervention.

The court, while considering the facts and circumstances of the case, disposed of the writ petition with specific directions. The petitioner was ordered to "remit the overdue amount ₹2,60,125/- in the Housing Loan account and the outstanding amount of ₹17,58,289/- in the Overdraft account in 10 equal and consecutive monthly instalments" [Para 11(i)], starting from February 19, 2024. The court also directed that the current EMIs in the Housing Loan account should be paid along with the aforesaid payments [Para 11(iii)]. It was emphasized that if the petitioner defaulted in making these payments, the respondents would be free to continue with coercive proceedings [Para 11(ii)].

This decision reflects the judiciary's recognition of the financial hardships faced by individuals due to the COVID-19 pandemic and its willingness to provide reasonable accommodations in loan repayments. The case underscores the importance of a balanced approach in financial disputes, especially in unprecedented times like a pandemic.

Date of Decision: 17th January 2024

ANIL KUMAR.G VS THE KERALA BANK

 

Latest Legal News