Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

SARFASI Act: High Court of Kerala Grants Relief to Borrower, Orders Repayment in Installments Amidst COVID-19 Hardships

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Kerala, presided over by Justice N. Nagares, granted relief to a borrower facing coercive recovery proceedings for loans availed from Kerala Bank. The petitioner, Anil Kumar G., had approached the court aggrieved by the bank's recovery actions under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

Justice Nagares, in his observation, empathized with the borrower's situation, acknowledging that "the default in repayment occurred lately due to reasons beyond the control of the petitioner" [Para 9]. The court recognized the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the petitioner's financial ability to repay the loans.

Anil Kumar had availed various loans from Kerala Bank between 2011 and 2022. He faced difficulties in repaying due to the pandemic and sought to arrange the repayment of overdue amounts in monthly installments. However, the bank initiated coercive proceedings, leading him to seek judicial intervention.

The court, while considering the facts and circumstances of the case, disposed of the writ petition with specific directions. The petitioner was ordered to "remit the overdue amount ₹2,60,125/- in the Housing Loan account and the outstanding amount of ₹17,58,289/- in the Overdraft account in 10 equal and consecutive monthly instalments" [Para 11(i)], starting from February 19, 2024. The court also directed that the current EMIs in the Housing Loan account should be paid along with the aforesaid payments [Para 11(iii)]. It was emphasized that if the petitioner defaulted in making these payments, the respondents would be free to continue with coercive proceedings [Para 11(ii)].

This decision reflects the judiciary's recognition of the financial hardships faced by individuals due to the COVID-19 pandemic and its willingness to provide reasonable accommodations in loan repayments. The case underscores the importance of a balanced approach in financial disputes, especially in unprecedented times like a pandemic.

Date of Decision: 17th January 2024

ANIL KUMAR.G VS THE KERALA BANK

 

Latest Legal News