Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal GST Officer Froze Business Accounts Without Any Legal Basis, Ignored Taxpayer for Three Months: Bombay High Court Imposes Personal Costs Weapon Recovered, But No Forensic Report, No Independent Witness — Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused

SARFASI Act: High Court of Kerala Grants Relief to Borrower, Orders Repayment in Installments Amidst COVID-19 Hardships

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Kerala, presided over by Justice N. Nagares, granted relief to a borrower facing coercive recovery proceedings for loans availed from Kerala Bank. The petitioner, Anil Kumar G., had approached the court aggrieved by the bank's recovery actions under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

Justice Nagares, in his observation, empathized with the borrower's situation, acknowledging that "the default in repayment occurred lately due to reasons beyond the control of the petitioner" [Para 9]. The court recognized the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the petitioner's financial ability to repay the loans.

Anil Kumar had availed various loans from Kerala Bank between 2011 and 2022. He faced difficulties in repaying due to the pandemic and sought to arrange the repayment of overdue amounts in monthly installments. However, the bank initiated coercive proceedings, leading him to seek judicial intervention.

The court, while considering the facts and circumstances of the case, disposed of the writ petition with specific directions. The petitioner was ordered to "remit the overdue amount ₹2,60,125/- in the Housing Loan account and the outstanding amount of ₹17,58,289/- in the Overdraft account in 10 equal and consecutive monthly instalments" [Para 11(i)], starting from February 19, 2024. The court also directed that the current EMIs in the Housing Loan account should be paid along with the aforesaid payments [Para 11(iii)]. It was emphasized that if the petitioner defaulted in making these payments, the respondents would be free to continue with coercive proceedings [Para 11(ii)].

This decision reflects the judiciary's recognition of the financial hardships faced by individuals due to the COVID-19 pandemic and its willingness to provide reasonable accommodations in loan repayments. The case underscores the importance of a balanced approach in financial disputes, especially in unprecedented times like a pandemic.

Date of Decision: 17th January 2024

ANIL KUMAR.G VS THE KERALA BANK

 

Latest Legal News