Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

Sale deed can be considered to assess market value of a land – Land Acquisition Act - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Land was acquired under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') by the Collector, Land Acquisition vide his award dated 16.03.1993. At the instance of the land owner a reference was made under Section 18 of the Act to the District Court - Reference Court. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order passed by the Reference Court assessing the compensation of the land acquired at Rs.2,18,333/- per acre – the Land Acquisition Officer preferred the appeal before the High Court and same was partly allowed  and assessed/determined the compensation  at Rs.232.45 per cent. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court assessing/determining the compensation for the land acquired at Rs.232.45 per cent, the original owner/claimant has preferred the present appeal.Land Acquisition Officer determined and awarded compensation at Rs.160 per cent i.e. 1 acre out of survey no.359 was sold for Rs.16,000. However, the Learned Reference Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.2183.33 per cent relying upon and considering the sale instance Ex.C1 dated 11.01.1990 executed by the land owners himself. In the appeal preferred by the State the High Court has reduced the amount of compensation at a cost of Rs.232.45 per cent. Apex court held that Section 4 Notification was issued and published for the first time on 27.09.1990. In the present case both, the Reference Court as well as the High Court relied upon Ex.C1 sale deed dated 11.01.1990 by which 5 ½ per cent of the land was sold at Rs.2977 per cent. The sale deed cannot be discarded solely on the ground that it was executed by the land owner in favour of his relative. The sale deed dated 11.01.1990 Ex.C1 was for the small parcel of the land i.e. 5 ½ per cent only and after deducting 60 per cent (in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case) the market value can be determined/assessed at Rs.1191 per cent. It is held that the appellant original claimant - land owner shall be entitled compensation for the land acquired with all other statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act. The appeal is partly allowed . 

D.D- September 29, 2021 

MUNUSAMY Versus THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

Latest Legal News