Motor Accident Claim Maintainable Despite Compensation Under Workmen’s Compensation Act – Insurer Liable Despite Fake Licence Allegation: Gujarat High Court Review Is Not a Second Round of Litigation: Orissa High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking Reconsideration of Dropped Contempt in MCL Appointment Case Fresh Ex Parte Relief Cannot Bypass Order 39 Rule 3 – Restoration of Electricity Refused for Tenant Running Cold Storage: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 498A IPC | Telling Her To Indulge In Prostitution For Dowry Is Most Obnoxious Form Of Harassment: Jharkhand High Court Search Can’t Stretch Time: Gujarat High Court Quashes Income Tax Reopening Beyond 10-Year Limit in Search-Based Reassessment 138 NI Act | Mere Claim of ‘Security Cheque’ No Defence Against Statutory Presumption : Calcutta High Court Rigour of Section 37 NDPS Act Cannot Be Diluted by Bail Pleas Citing Delay or Procedural Defects: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in Heroin Recovery Case If Arbitration Clause Itself Bars Larger Claims, Court Cannot Appoint Arbitrator: Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 11 Application Once Arbitration Clause Exists and Proceedings Are Ongoing, Civil Court Must Step Back: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Suit for Injunction in Partnership Dispute Autonomy of Private Schools Can't Be Crushed in the Name of Fee Regulation: J&K High Court Strikes Down FFRC Chairperson Clause, Upholds Fee Control Law with Caveats Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Must Be Proved as a Fact – Mere Possession of Money Not Enough: Kerala High Court Recovery Alone Can't Prove Bribery Where Legal Fee Is Established Through Official Records: Punjab & Haryana High Court Acquits Patwari Exoneration on Technical Grounds Can’t Quash Criminal Prosecution for Tax Evasion: Kerala High Court Denies Relief to Doctor Accused of Concealment Answer To A Leading Question Cannot Be Sole Basis For Conviction In Serious Offences Like Rape: Bombay High Court NDPS | Mere Absence of Contraband No Ground for Bail When Recovery from Co-Accused Points to Coordinated Drug Network: Punjab & Haryana High Court Allahabad High Court Quashes Ceiling Surplus Land Order Passed Without Spot Inspection, Ignores Rights Acquired Through Adverse Possession Civil Death Cannot Be the Price of Past Mistakes: Orissa High Court Strikes Down Blanket Tender Ban on Previously Blacklisted Bidders Once Supreme Court Cancels Bail for Violation, Subordinate Courts Cannot Reconsider: Karnataka High Court Non-joinder Is a Curable Defect, Not a Death Blow to Appeal: Madhya Pradesh High Court Restores Mutation Appeal Stale Allegations and Closed FIRs Cannot Justify Preventive Detention: J&K High Court Quashes PSA Detention Order for Lack of Proximate Link Employment-Related Separation Cannot Be Labelled as Desertion: Jharkhand High Court Dismisses Husband’s Divorce Appeal “Fair Pre-Estimate” of Damages Valid Even Without Proof of Loss: Delhi High Court Partly Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Carlsberg Dispute Or 39 CPC | Unregistered Will With Single Attesting Witness Cannot Confer Absolute Title: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction Failure To Comply With Mandatory Rent Deposit Directions Under WBPTA Will Invite Striking Off of Tenant’s Defence, Even For Single Default: Calcutta High Court Insistence on Impossible Term Reflects Absence of Readiness: Bombay High Court Denies Specific Performance for Delay and Inflexibility Medical Negligence | Stem Cell Therapy for Autism Is Not Valid Medical Practice: Supreme Court Declares Commercial Use as Medical Negligence Stem Cells Are ‘Drugs’ Under Law, Not Medical Procedures”: Supreme Court Brings Stem Cell Therapy Back Under Drugs Act NGT Can Impose Compensation Without Statutory Formula, Guided By Polluter Pays Principle: Supreme Court Upholds Environmental Penalties On Builders Environmental Compensation Must Not Be Illusory: Supreme Court Upholds NGT’s ₹5 Crore Penalty On Builder For Violating Environmental Laws Section 34 Court Has Limited Power to Modify Arbitral Award — But It Exists: Supreme Court Endorses Judicial Calibration of Damages in Arbitration Delay in Public Utility Projects Is Per Se a Loss: Supreme Court Upholds ₹27 Crore Damages Against Solar Developer Article 21 | Menstrual Health is an Integral Facet of Right to Life & Dignity: Supreme Court RTE Act | Free Sanitary Pads, Vending Machines & Separate Toilets Mandatory for All Schools: Supreme Court Issues Continuing Mandamus No Waiver of Fundamental Rights by Signing a Job Contract: Supreme Court Declares Contractual Clauses Barring Regularization Unenforceable When the State is the Lion, the Employee Cannot Be the Lamb Forever: Supreme Court Slams Jharkhand for Exploiting Contractual Engineers for a Decade Bail Once Granted Should Not Be Cancelled Lightly: Supreme Court Refuses to Revoke Bail of Accused in Daylight Murder Case A Decade of Targeted Persecution Cannot Be Cloaked as Procedure: Supreme Court Slams Department for Systematic Denial of ITAT Appointment Even Presence Of A Single Biased Member Vitiates  Selection Process: Supreme Court Nullifies ITAT Appointment Panel Over Bias Concerns Court Can Prevent Institutional Vacuum Despite Invalid Appointment: Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Protect Tenure of Vice-Chancellor in Exceptional Circumstances State Cannot Override Higher Education Standards Set by Parliament: Supreme Court Declares Puducherry VC Appointment Illegal, Upholds Primacy of UGC Regulations

RTE Act | Free Sanitary Pads, Vending Machines & Separate Toilets Mandatory for All Schools: Supreme Court Issues Continuing Mandamus

31 January 2026 2:04 PM

By: sayum


“The norms and standards laid down in the Schedule are not merely procedural in nature but are integral to the effective realization of Section 3 of the RTE Act.”— In a seminal ruling, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan, has issued a slew of mandatory directions to the Union and State Governments to ensure free sanitary napkins and separate toilets in all schools, enforcing the "norms and standards" of the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009.

Mandatory Infrastructure: Beyond "Walls to Hide"

The Court expressed dismay that even 17 years after the RTE Act, many schools lack basic facilities. It clarified that Section 19 of the RTE Act, which mandates norms for school recognition, is non-negotiable. The Bench directed that all schools—Government, aided, or private—must provide functional, gender-segregated toilets with usable water connectivity. The Court explicitly rejected the "paucity of funds" defense, stating that financial constraints cannot justify the violation of fundamental rights.

“We are constrained to observe that such failure is not administrative but constitutional.”

Free Sanitary Napkins and Disposal Mechanisms

The Court has directed all States and Union Territories to provide oxo-biodegradable sanitary napkins free of cost to girl students. These must be dispensed preferably through vending machines within toilet premises. Furthermore, to ensure hygiene and environmental compliance, the Court mandated the installation of safe disposal mechanisms (incinerators or covered bins) in accordance with Solid Waste Management Rules. The judgment also directs the establishment of MHM Corners equipped with spare innerwear and uniforms to handle exigencies.

Breaking the Taboo: Role of Men and Boys

In a progressive stride, the Court emphasized that menstrual health is a "shared responsibility" and not solely a woman's issue. The Bench directed that male teachers and boys must be sensitized and educated about the biological reality of menstruation to eliminate stigma and teasing. The Court noted that an unsupportive or hostile environment is as much a barrier to education as the lack of toilets.

“Ignorance breeds insensitivity, knowledge breeds empathy.”

Continuing Mandamus and Accountability

Recognizing that previous policies often remained on paper, the Court issued a Continuing Mandamus. The Union Government must monitor compliance across all States. District Education Officers (DEOs) are directed to conduct periodic inspections and mandatory anonymous surveys of students to assess the reality of facilities. The Court has listed the matter for a compliance report in three months, warning that non-compliance by schools will lead to de-recognition.

Date of Decision: 30th January, 2026

Latest Legal News