Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

RTE Act | Free Sanitary Pads, Vending Machines & Separate Toilets Mandatory for All Schools: Supreme Court Issues Continuing Mandamus

31 January 2026 2:04 PM

By: sayum


“The norms and standards laid down in the Schedule are not merely procedural in nature but are integral to the effective realization of Section 3 of the RTE Act.”— In a seminal ruling, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan, has issued a slew of mandatory directions to the Union and State Governments to ensure free sanitary napkins and separate toilets in all schools, enforcing the "norms and standards" of the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009.

Mandatory Infrastructure: Beyond "Walls to Hide"

The Court expressed dismay that even 17 years after the RTE Act, many schools lack basic facilities. It clarified that Section 19 of the RTE Act, which mandates norms for school recognition, is non-negotiable. The Bench directed that all schools—Government, aided, or private—must provide functional, gender-segregated toilets with usable water connectivity. The Court explicitly rejected the "paucity of funds" defense, stating that financial constraints cannot justify the violation of fundamental rights.

“We are constrained to observe that such failure is not administrative but constitutional.”

Free Sanitary Napkins and Disposal Mechanisms

The Court has directed all States and Union Territories to provide oxo-biodegradable sanitary napkins free of cost to girl students. These must be dispensed preferably through vending machines within toilet premises. Furthermore, to ensure hygiene and environmental compliance, the Court mandated the installation of safe disposal mechanisms (incinerators or covered bins) in accordance with Solid Waste Management Rules. The judgment also directs the establishment of MHM Corners equipped with spare innerwear and uniforms to handle exigencies.

Breaking the Taboo: Role of Men and Boys

In a progressive stride, the Court emphasized that menstrual health is a "shared responsibility" and not solely a woman's issue. The Bench directed that male teachers and boys must be sensitized and educated about the biological reality of menstruation to eliminate stigma and teasing. The Court noted that an unsupportive or hostile environment is as much a barrier to education as the lack of toilets.

“Ignorance breeds insensitivity, knowledge breeds empathy.”

Continuing Mandamus and Accountability

Recognizing that previous policies often remained on paper, the Court issued a Continuing Mandamus. The Union Government must monitor compliance across all States. District Education Officers (DEOs) are directed to conduct periodic inspections and mandatory anonymous surveys of students to assess the reality of facilities. The Court has listed the matter for a compliance report in three months, warning that non-compliance by schools will lead to de-recognition.

Date of Decision: 30th January, 2026

Latest Legal News