Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

RTE Act | Free Sanitary Pads, Vending Machines & Separate Toilets Mandatory for All Schools: Supreme Court Issues Continuing Mandamus

31 January 2026 2:04 PM

By: sayum


“The norms and standards laid down in the Schedule are not merely procedural in nature but are integral to the effective realization of Section 3 of the RTE Act.”— In a seminal ruling, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan, has issued a slew of mandatory directions to the Union and State Governments to ensure free sanitary napkins and separate toilets in all schools, enforcing the "norms and standards" of the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009.

Mandatory Infrastructure: Beyond "Walls to Hide"

The Court expressed dismay that even 17 years after the RTE Act, many schools lack basic facilities. It clarified that Section 19 of the RTE Act, which mandates norms for school recognition, is non-negotiable. The Bench directed that all schools—Government, aided, or private—must provide functional, gender-segregated toilets with usable water connectivity. The Court explicitly rejected the "paucity of funds" defense, stating that financial constraints cannot justify the violation of fundamental rights.

“We are constrained to observe that such failure is not administrative but constitutional.”

Free Sanitary Napkins and Disposal Mechanisms

The Court has directed all States and Union Territories to provide oxo-biodegradable sanitary napkins free of cost to girl students. These must be dispensed preferably through vending machines within toilet premises. Furthermore, to ensure hygiene and environmental compliance, the Court mandated the installation of safe disposal mechanisms (incinerators or covered bins) in accordance with Solid Waste Management Rules. The judgment also directs the establishment of MHM Corners equipped with spare innerwear and uniforms to handle exigencies.

Breaking the Taboo: Role of Men and Boys

In a progressive stride, the Court emphasized that menstrual health is a "shared responsibility" and not solely a woman's issue. The Bench directed that male teachers and boys must be sensitized and educated about the biological reality of menstruation to eliminate stigma and teasing. The Court noted that an unsupportive or hostile environment is as much a barrier to education as the lack of toilets.

“Ignorance breeds insensitivity, knowledge breeds empathy.”

Continuing Mandamus and Accountability

Recognizing that previous policies often remained on paper, the Court issued a Continuing Mandamus. The Union Government must monitor compliance across all States. District Education Officers (DEOs) are directed to conduct periodic inspections and mandatory anonymous surveys of students to assess the reality of facilities. The Court has listed the matter for a compliance report in three months, warning that non-compliance by schools will lead to de-recognition.

Date of Decision: 30th January, 2026

Latest Legal News