MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |    

Right to Self-Perceived Gender Identity Affirmed by Kerala High Court: Transgender Woman’s Enrolment in NCC Upheld

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Kerala High Court, in a significant judgment, has affirmed the right of Hina Haneefa, a transgender woman, to enrol in the National Cadet Corps (NCC) as per her self-perceived gender identity. This decision is a pivotal recognition of transgender rights under the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, and upholds the principles of equality and non-discrimination enshrined in the Indian Constitution.

Facts and Issues: The case involved Hina Haneefa, a transwoman who, post-sex reassignment surgery, sought enrolment in the NCC’s female wing. The refusal of her enrolment was initially based on the criteria set by Section 6 of the National Cadet Corps Act, 1948, which only acknowledged male and female categories. The central issue was whether this refusal infringed upon her rights under the Transgender Persons Act and the Constitution.

Court Assessment: The Court closely examined the relevant statutes, particularly emphasizing the Transgender Persons Act. Justice C.S. Sudha remarked, “…when the petitioner has been given the identity of a female, she is certainly entitled to be enrolled in the NCC under Section 6(2) of the Act.” The judgment recognized the crucial right to self-perceived gender identity. However, the Court clarified its limitation in directing the legislature to amend the NCC Act, highlighting the separation of powers in governance.

Decision: The Kerala High Court ruled in favor of Hina Haneefa, allowing her enrolment in the NCC as a female candidate. The directive to amend the NCC Act for including transgender individuals was set aside, with the Court expressing hope that the government would consider including transgender categories in light of the Supreme Court’s directives and the provisions of the Transgender Persons Act.

Date of Decision: 22nd February 2024

National Cadet Corps & Others.  VS Hina Haneefa @ Muhammed Ashif Ali N & Others.

Similar News