Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court

Right to Self-Perceived Gender Identity Affirmed by Kerala High Court: Transgender Woman’s Enrolment in NCC Upheld

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Kerala High Court, in a significant judgment, has affirmed the right of Hina Haneefa, a transgender woman, to enrol in the National Cadet Corps (NCC) as per her self-perceived gender identity. This decision is a pivotal recognition of transgender rights under the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, and upholds the principles of equality and non-discrimination enshrined in the Indian Constitution.

Facts and Issues: The case involved Hina Haneefa, a transwoman who, post-sex reassignment surgery, sought enrolment in the NCC’s female wing. The refusal of her enrolment was initially based on the criteria set by Section 6 of the National Cadet Corps Act, 1948, which only acknowledged male and female categories. The central issue was whether this refusal infringed upon her rights under the Transgender Persons Act and the Constitution.

Court Assessment: The Court closely examined the relevant statutes, particularly emphasizing the Transgender Persons Act. Justice C.S. Sudha remarked, “…when the petitioner has been given the identity of a female, she is certainly entitled to be enrolled in the NCC under Section 6(2) of the Act.” The judgment recognized the crucial right to self-perceived gender identity. However, the Court clarified its limitation in directing the legislature to amend the NCC Act, highlighting the separation of powers in governance.

Decision: The Kerala High Court ruled in favor of Hina Haneefa, allowing her enrolment in the NCC as a female candidate. The directive to amend the NCC Act for including transgender individuals was set aside, with the Court expressing hope that the government would consider including transgender categories in light of the Supreme Court’s directives and the provisions of the Transgender Persons Act.

Date of Decision: 22nd February 2024

National Cadet Corps & Others.  VS Hina Haneefa @ Muhammed Ashif Ali N & Others.

Latest Legal News