Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrants Against Petitioner, Stresses on Fair Procedure in Line with Article 21

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 The Punjab and Haryana High Court today set aside the non-bailable warrants issued against Vakul Khullar, with Justice Harpreet Singh Brar emphasizing the importance of a procedure that is fair, just, and not arbitrary, in consonance with Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court's decision focused on the compatibility of criminal justice procedures with constitutional mandates. The court highlighted the necessity to balance personal liberty and societal interests in maintaining law and order.

Facts and Issues: Vakul Khullar approached the High Court for quashing the non-bailable warrants issued against him in connection with FIR No. 202 dated 18.09.2021 registered under Section 174-A IPC at Samrala Police Station, Ludhiana. The petitioner had been declared a Proclaimed Person after failing to appear in court due to urgent travels to Canada and later for work permit renewal.

Court Assessment: Justice Brar, after reviewing the case and previous relevant judgments, found that the issuance of non-bailable warrants against Khullar was unjustified. The court noted that the sole reason for the issuance was the petitioner's absence, which was not deliberate but due to unavoidable circumstances. The judge referred to precedents that mandate recording satisfaction before issuing processes under Section 82 Cr.P.C., and noted any non-compliance with this renders a proclamation a nullity.

Legal Principles and Law: The judgment reinforced the principles laid down in Major Singh @ Major vs. State of Punjab and Sonu vs. State of Haryana, emphasizing the mandatory nature of conditions specified in Section 82 (2) Cr.P.C. for issuing proclamations against absconders.

Decision: The High Court quashed the impugned order dated 05.12.2023 and directed Khullar to appear before the trial court within two weeks. Upon appearance, he is to be granted bail on furnishing bail and surety bonds, along with costs of Rs. 20,000/- to the District Legal Services Authority, Ludhiana, for wasting court's time.

Date of Decision: February 01, 2024

Vakul Khullar @ Wakul Khullar vs. State of Punjab

Latest Legal News