Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrants Against Petitioner, Stresses on Fair Procedure in Line with Article 21

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 The Punjab and Haryana High Court today set aside the non-bailable warrants issued against Vakul Khullar, with Justice Harpreet Singh Brar emphasizing the importance of a procedure that is fair, just, and not arbitrary, in consonance with Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court's decision focused on the compatibility of criminal justice procedures with constitutional mandates. The court highlighted the necessity to balance personal liberty and societal interests in maintaining law and order.

Facts and Issues: Vakul Khullar approached the High Court for quashing the non-bailable warrants issued against him in connection with FIR No. 202 dated 18.09.2021 registered under Section 174-A IPC at Samrala Police Station, Ludhiana. The petitioner had been declared a Proclaimed Person after failing to appear in court due to urgent travels to Canada and later for work permit renewal.

Court Assessment: Justice Brar, after reviewing the case and previous relevant judgments, found that the issuance of non-bailable warrants against Khullar was unjustified. The court noted that the sole reason for the issuance was the petitioner's absence, which was not deliberate but due to unavoidable circumstances. The judge referred to precedents that mandate recording satisfaction before issuing processes under Section 82 Cr.P.C., and noted any non-compliance with this renders a proclamation a nullity.

Legal Principles and Law: The judgment reinforced the principles laid down in Major Singh @ Major vs. State of Punjab and Sonu vs. State of Haryana, emphasizing the mandatory nature of conditions specified in Section 82 (2) Cr.P.C. for issuing proclamations against absconders.

Decision: The High Court quashed the impugned order dated 05.12.2023 and directed Khullar to appear before the trial court within two weeks. Upon appearance, he is to be granted bail on furnishing bail and surety bonds, along with costs of Rs. 20,000/- to the District Legal Services Authority, Ludhiana, for wasting court's time.

Date of Decision: February 01, 2024

Vakul Khullar @ Wakul Khullar vs. State of Punjab

Latest Legal News