Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrants Against Petitioner, Stresses on Fair Procedure in Line with Article 21

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 The Punjab and Haryana High Court today set aside the non-bailable warrants issued against Vakul Khullar, with Justice Harpreet Singh Brar emphasizing the importance of a procedure that is fair, just, and not arbitrary, in consonance with Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court's decision focused on the compatibility of criminal justice procedures with constitutional mandates. The court highlighted the necessity to balance personal liberty and societal interests in maintaining law and order.

Facts and Issues: Vakul Khullar approached the High Court for quashing the non-bailable warrants issued against him in connection with FIR No. 202 dated 18.09.2021 registered under Section 174-A IPC at Samrala Police Station, Ludhiana. The petitioner had been declared a Proclaimed Person after failing to appear in court due to urgent travels to Canada and later for work permit renewal.

Court Assessment: Justice Brar, after reviewing the case and previous relevant judgments, found that the issuance of non-bailable warrants against Khullar was unjustified. The court noted that the sole reason for the issuance was the petitioner's absence, which was not deliberate but due to unavoidable circumstances. The judge referred to precedents that mandate recording satisfaction before issuing processes under Section 82 Cr.P.C., and noted any non-compliance with this renders a proclamation a nullity.

Legal Principles and Law: The judgment reinforced the principles laid down in Major Singh @ Major vs. State of Punjab and Sonu vs. State of Haryana, emphasizing the mandatory nature of conditions specified in Section 82 (2) Cr.P.C. for issuing proclamations against absconders.

Decision: The High Court quashed the impugned order dated 05.12.2023 and directed Khullar to appear before the trial court within two weeks. Upon appearance, he is to be granted bail on furnishing bail and surety bonds, along with costs of Rs. 20,000/- to the District Legal Services Authority, Ludhiana, for wasting court's time.

Date of Decision: February 01, 2024

Vakul Khullar @ Wakul Khullar vs. State of Punjab

Latest Legal News