Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrants Against Petitioner, Stresses on Fair Procedure in Line with Article 21

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 The Punjab and Haryana High Court today set aside the non-bailable warrants issued against Vakul Khullar, with Justice Harpreet Singh Brar emphasizing the importance of a procedure that is fair, just, and not arbitrary, in consonance with Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court's decision focused on the compatibility of criminal justice procedures with constitutional mandates. The court highlighted the necessity to balance personal liberty and societal interests in maintaining law and order.

Facts and Issues: Vakul Khullar approached the High Court for quashing the non-bailable warrants issued against him in connection with FIR No. 202 dated 18.09.2021 registered under Section 174-A IPC at Samrala Police Station, Ludhiana. The petitioner had been declared a Proclaimed Person after failing to appear in court due to urgent travels to Canada and later for work permit renewal.

Court Assessment: Justice Brar, after reviewing the case and previous relevant judgments, found that the issuance of non-bailable warrants against Khullar was unjustified. The court noted that the sole reason for the issuance was the petitioner's absence, which was not deliberate but due to unavoidable circumstances. The judge referred to precedents that mandate recording satisfaction before issuing processes under Section 82 Cr.P.C., and noted any non-compliance with this renders a proclamation a nullity.

Legal Principles and Law: The judgment reinforced the principles laid down in Major Singh @ Major vs. State of Punjab and Sonu vs. State of Haryana, emphasizing the mandatory nature of conditions specified in Section 82 (2) Cr.P.C. for issuing proclamations against absconders.

Decision: The High Court quashed the impugned order dated 05.12.2023 and directed Khullar to appear before the trial court within two weeks. Upon appearance, he is to be granted bail on furnishing bail and surety bonds, along with costs of Rs. 20,000/- to the District Legal Services Authority, Ludhiana, for wasting court's time.

Date of Decision: February 01, 2024

Vakul Khullar @ Wakul Khullar vs. State of Punjab

Latest Legal News