UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrants Against Petitioner, Stresses on Fair Procedure in Line with Article 21

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 The Punjab and Haryana High Court today set aside the non-bailable warrants issued against Vakul Khullar, with Justice Harpreet Singh Brar emphasizing the importance of a procedure that is fair, just, and not arbitrary, in consonance with Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court's decision focused on the compatibility of criminal justice procedures with constitutional mandates. The court highlighted the necessity to balance personal liberty and societal interests in maintaining law and order.

Facts and Issues: Vakul Khullar approached the High Court for quashing the non-bailable warrants issued against him in connection with FIR No. 202 dated 18.09.2021 registered under Section 174-A IPC at Samrala Police Station, Ludhiana. The petitioner had been declared a Proclaimed Person after failing to appear in court due to urgent travels to Canada and later for work permit renewal.

Court Assessment: Justice Brar, after reviewing the case and previous relevant judgments, found that the issuance of non-bailable warrants against Khullar was unjustified. The court noted that the sole reason for the issuance was the petitioner's absence, which was not deliberate but due to unavoidable circumstances. The judge referred to precedents that mandate recording satisfaction before issuing processes under Section 82 Cr.P.C., and noted any non-compliance with this renders a proclamation a nullity.

Legal Principles and Law: The judgment reinforced the principles laid down in Major Singh @ Major vs. State of Punjab and Sonu vs. State of Haryana, emphasizing the mandatory nature of conditions specified in Section 82 (2) Cr.P.C. for issuing proclamations against absconders.

Decision: The High Court quashed the impugned order dated 05.12.2023 and directed Khullar to appear before the trial court within two weeks. Upon appearance, he is to be granted bail on furnishing bail and surety bonds, along with costs of Rs. 20,000/- to the District Legal Services Authority, Ludhiana, for wasting court's time.

Date of Decision: February 01, 2024

Vakul Khullar @ Wakul Khullar vs. State of Punjab

Latest Legal News