Electricity Act 2003 | Section 56(2) Does Not Preclude Licensee From Raising Supplementary Demand After Two Years; Only Restricts Right To Disconnect: Supreme Court Dissolution Of Partnership At Will | Outgoing Partner Entitled To Market Value Of Assets As On Date Of Distribution, Not Date Of Dissolution: Supreme Court SEBI | Release Of Escrow Under Buyback Regulations Does Not Preclude Independent Inquiry Into Fraud Under PFUTP Regulations: Supreme Court Promotion Based On Merit Does Not Wipe Out Past Adverse Records But Must Be Balanced In FR 56(j) Compulsory Retirement: Supreme Court Appellate Court Can Convict For Offence Even If Charge Not Framed By Trial Court Under Section 464 CrPC: Supreme Court Extradition | Sovereign Assurance Does Not Override Judicial Sentencing; Cannot Be Used To Artificially Accelerate Sentence Completion: Supreme Court Article 21 | State Has A Positive Duty To Protect Public Health By Implementing Front-Of-Package Labelling Regulations: Supreme Court Revenue Entries Are Not Documents Of Title, Cannot Replace Substantive Evidence In Property Disputes: Supreme Court Long Possession Without Hostile Animus Does Not Amount To Adverse Possession: Supreme Court Administrative Discretion Must Comply With Article 14; Subsequent Executive Decisions Cannot Retroactively Cure Failure Of Timely Performance: Supreme Court Municipal Corporation Cannot Unilaterally Downgrade Market Value Of Land Acquired For Road Widening To Deny TDR Certificates: Andhra Pradesh High Court Execution Of Agreement To Sell Does Not Automatically Terminate Existing Tenancy: Allahabad High Court Writ Jurisdiction Not Maintainable When Title To Property Is Under A Cloud And Subject Matter Of Disputed Facts: Andhra Pradesh High Court Amendment Of Plaint Seeking Impleadment Of Third Parties And Addition Of Time-Barred Claims In A Partition Suit Cannot Be Permitted: Bombay High Court Reassessment Order Does Not Result In Merger Of Original Assessment Order If Issues Are Distinct: Andhra Pradesh High Court GST Assessment Order Uploaded Only Under 'Additional Notices' Tab Without Separate Intimation Violates Principles Of Natural Justice: Calcutta High Court 'Prolonged Inaction' Cannot Be Rewarded: Delhi High Court Upholds CESTAT Refusal To Condone 968-Day Delay In Filing Customs Appeal Probate No Longer Mandatory To Establish Rights Under A Will Following 2025 Amendment To Indian Succession Act: J&K High Court Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Used To Introduce New Factual Foundations Or Reopen Concluded Arbitral Awards: Karnataka High Court High Court Cannot Invoke Article 227 To Strike Off Plaint When Statutory Remedy Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Is Available: Madras High Court Section 58 BNSS | Detention Beyond 24 Hours Without Magistrate’s Authority Vitiates Arrest And Subsequent Remand: Orissa High Court Arbitrator Is The Sole Judge Of Quality And Quantity Of Evidence, Court Cannot Act As Court Of Appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 5 Limitation Act | Court Cannot Condone Delay In A Mechanical Manner Without Ascertaining Bona Fides Of The Applicant: Calcutta High Court High Court Cannot Quash FIR Under Section 482 CrPC By Conducting Mini-Trial On Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court Taxation Law | Mere Assertion Of Natural Justice Violation On Disputed Facts Won't Bypass Statutory Appeal: Delhi High Court

Punjab-Haryana High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case: Emphasizes Right to Speedy Trial and Protracted Custody Concerns

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab-Haryana High Court has granted bail to Gurdeep Singh @ Deepak, who was arrested in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The Court's decision on December 21, 2023, underscores the principles of the right to a speedy trial and the implications of prolonged custody.

Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, presiding over the case, observed that “the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted to an extent in view of the salutary provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.” This reference to Article 21, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, highlights the Court’s concern for the rights of the accused amidst legal proceedings.

Gurdeep Singh was arrested on June 23, 2022, with 864 intoxicating capsules of Spano-Croxywon-Plus. The investigation subsequently implicated two other individuals, leading to further arrests and recoveries of contraband. Singh's counsel argued for bail on grounds of alleged false implication and non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act, including the non-joining of independent witnesses during the search and seizure.

The State's counsel opposed the bail citing the recovery of a commercial quantity of contraband. However, he acknowledged that the petitioner was a first-time offender and none of the 11 prosecution witnesses had been examined to date.

In granting bail, the Court referenced Supreme Court precedents, particularly focusing on the duration of custody and the delay in the trial process. Justice Bedi ordered Singh's release on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. Additionally, Singh is required to appear before the police station on the first Monday of every month and deposit an FDR of Rs. 1,00,000/- as a condition for bail.

This judgment is seen as a reinforcement of the judiciary's commitment to ensuring a balance between the strictures of law enforcement and the protection of individual rights, especially in cases involving protracted legal proceedings.

Date of Decision: December 21, 2023

Gurdeep Singh @ Deepak Vs State Of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News