Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization Article 21-A Cannot Be Held Hostage to Transfer Preferences: Allahabad High Court Upholds Teacher Redeployment to Enforce Pupil–Teacher Ratio Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Paying Tax Does Not Legalise Illegality: Bombay High Court Refuses to Shield Alleged Unauthorized Structure Beneficial Pension Scheme Cannot Be Defeated By Cut-Off Dates: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs EPFO To Follow Sunil Kumar B. Guidelines On Higher Pension Claims Equity Aids the Vigilant, Not Those Who Sleep Over Their Rights: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses to Revive 36-Year-Old Pay Parity Claim Students Cannot Be Penalised For Legislative Invalidity: Supreme Court Protects Degrees Granted Before 2005 Yash Pal Verdict Restructuring Without Fulfilment of Conditions Cannot Defeat Insolvency: Supreme Court Reaffirms Default as the Sole Trigger Under Section 7 IBC Section 100-A CPC Slams The Door On Intra-Court Appeals In RERA Matters”: Allahabad High Court Declares Special Appeal Not Maintainable Mental Distance Between ‘May Be’ and ‘Must Be’ Is Long: Patna High Court Acquits Six in Murder Case Built on Broken Chain of Circumstances Where Corruption Takes Roots, Rule of Law Is Replaced by Rule of Transaction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to DIG Harcharan Singh Bhullar Mere Voter List and Corrected SSC Certificate Cannot Prove Paternity: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects 21-Year-Old Bid for DNA Test in Partition Appeal Section 147 NI Act Makes Offence Compoundable At Any Stage: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Concurrent Convictions in Cheque Bounce Case After Settlement Bald Allegations of Adultery Based on Suspicion Cannot Dissolve a Marriage: Jharkhand High Court Once a Document Is Admitted in Evidence, Its Stamp Defect Cannot Be Reopened: Madras High Court

Punjab-Haryana High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case: Emphasizes Right to Speedy Trial and Protracted Custody Concerns

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab-Haryana High Court has granted bail to Gurdeep Singh @ Deepak, who was arrested in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The Court's decision on December 21, 2023, underscores the principles of the right to a speedy trial and the implications of prolonged custody.

Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, presiding over the case, observed that “the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act can be diluted to an extent in view of the salutary provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.” This reference to Article 21, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, highlights the Court’s concern for the rights of the accused amidst legal proceedings.

Gurdeep Singh was arrested on June 23, 2022, with 864 intoxicating capsules of Spano-Croxywon-Plus. The investigation subsequently implicated two other individuals, leading to further arrests and recoveries of contraband. Singh's counsel argued for bail on grounds of alleged false implication and non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act, including the non-joining of independent witnesses during the search and seizure.

The State's counsel opposed the bail citing the recovery of a commercial quantity of contraband. However, he acknowledged that the petitioner was a first-time offender and none of the 11 prosecution witnesses had been examined to date.

In granting bail, the Court referenced Supreme Court precedents, particularly focusing on the duration of custody and the delay in the trial process. Justice Bedi ordered Singh's release on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. Additionally, Singh is required to appear before the police station on the first Monday of every month and deposit an FDR of Rs. 1,00,000/- as a condition for bail.

This judgment is seen as a reinforcement of the judiciary's commitment to ensuring a balance between the strictures of law enforcement and the protection of individual rights, especially in cases involving protracted legal proceedings.

Date of Decision: December 21, 2023

Gurdeep Singh @ Deepak Vs State Of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News