Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Bail with 'Elaborative' Conditions in NDPS Act Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered on October 17, 2023, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to a petitioner charged under the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision, delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA, has attracted attention for its detailed and "elaborative" bail conditions.

The petitioner had sought bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), citing a long pre-trial custody period of over two years and six months. The court took into account the petitioner's criminal antecedents and the quantity of contraband involved in the case, which was categorized as "commercial."

In a noteworthy observation, the court emphasized the need for proportionality in bail conditions, stating, "The bail conditions imposed by the Court must not only have a nexus to the purpose that they seek to serve but must also be proportional to the purpose of imposing them. The courts, while imposing bail conditions, must balance the liberty of the accused and the necessity of a fair trial."

The judgment laid out a series of stringent conditions for the petitioner's bail, including the surrender of weapons and arms licenses and a restriction on the number of prepaid SIM cards. The court also permitted alternative options to surety, such as fixed deposits or account payee demand drafts.

Furthermore, the court noted that the accused could seek modifications to bail conditions if they found them difficult or violative of their rights, highlighting the court's commitment to ensuring fairness in the judicial process.

In response to concerns about the financial burden of bail, the court allowed the petitioner to request a reduction in the bond amount if it exceeded their means.

The judgment also emphasized the importance of desirable behavior by the accused in return for the protection from incarceration, and it cautioned against any attempts to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court's decision has sparked discussions about the role and scope of bail conditions in ensuring both the accused's rights and the safety of society. It sets a precedent for the use of proportionate and elaborate bail conditions, marking a significant development in the legal landscape.

Legal experts and practitioners are closely watching the implications of this judgment on future bail applications and the broader criminal justice system.

Date of Decision: 17.10.2023

Kulwinder Singh VS State of  Punjab   

Similar News