Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Protection of Reputation Over Reckless Journalism: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction Against ‘The Wire’ in Defamation Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court  granted an injunction in favor of Shri Naresh Kumar, Chief Secretary of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, in a defamation suit against ‘The Wire’ and others. The Court’s decision, pronounced by Hon’ble Justice Sachin Datta, underscores the primacy of protecting an individual’s reputation against irresponsible and defamatory journalism.

In the landmark judgment, Justice Datta observed, “the impugned article contains defamatory and libellous allegations… made in a reckless manner without regard to the truth, in order to cause injury to the reputation of the plaintiff.” This observation came in the wake of allegations that ‘The Wire’ published an article falsely implicating Kumar in a conflict of interest in a land compensation case related to the Dwarka Expressway project.

The Court directed 'The Wire' and associated defendants to remove the contested article and related social media posts, highlighting the immediate and irreparable damage caused to Kumar’s reputation. The ruling emphasized the delicate balance between freedom of speech and the protection of individual reputation, stating, “a grave and irreparable damage will be caused to the plaintiff if ad-interim injunctive orders are not passed.”

Justice Datta cited various legal precedents, including Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. L.K. Ratna and Vinai Kumar Saxena v. Aam Aadmi Party, reinforcing the notion that reputation is a critical component of an individual’s dignity and worth.

The Court’s decision has been seen as a significant affirmation of the rights of individuals to protect their reputation against unfounded and defamatory allegations, particularly in the era of digital media. It also serves as a stern reminder to media organizations about the importance of responsible journalism.

Compliance affidavits have been ordered, and the case is scheduled for further hearings, with all observations made by the Court being prima facie and subject to future orders. This judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications in the landscape of media law and the rights of individuals in defamation cases.

Date of Decision: 22 November 2023

SHRI NARESH KUMAR  VS THE WIRE & ORS.

Latest Legal News