Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

Prolonged Incarceration Generally Militates Against the Most Precious Fundamental Right Guaranteed Under Article 21,” Punjab and Haryana HC Grants Bail in NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Justice Pankaj Jain has granted bail to Roshan Singh, who had been incarcerated for over a year without trial, in a case involving the alleged possession of 230 kg of poppy husk. The court emphasized the importance of safeguarding fundamental rights against prolonged incarceration.

Roshan Singh was arrested on March 13, 2023, following a police operation that led to the recovery of a substantial quantity of poppy husk from a truck in which he was a passenger. Singh, who was neither the driver nor the owner of the vehicle, had been detained under various sections of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). His co-accused had been granted bail earlier, and Singh’s continued detention raised significant legal questions, particularly concerning the application of Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, which pertains to bail.

The court meticulously reviewed precedents set by the Supreme Court concerning bail under the NDPS Act, especially in cases of prolonged custody. Citing cases like Rabi Prakash v. State of Odisha and Mohammad Salman Hanif Shaikh v. State of Gujarat, Justice Jain noted that prolonged incarceration, especially when the trial has yet to commence, contravenes Article 21 of the Constitution, which protects life and personal liberty.

Custody Duration and Trial Delay: Singh had already spent over a year in custody with no commencement of trial proceedings or witness examinations, which tilts the balance in favor of granting bail.

Comparison with Co-accused: The co-accused, having similar roles, were previously granted bail, which brought up considerations of parity and fairness.

Conditions Under Section 37 of the NDPS Act: The court found that while Section 37 imposes stringent conditions for bail in NDPS cases, the actual circumstances, including the lack of criminal antecedents and the specifics of Singh’s involvement, supported a decision to grant bail.

Concluding its observations, the court ordered the release of Roshan Singh on bail, subject to several stringent conditions aimed at ensuring his presence at the trial and preventing any obstruction of justice. These conditions include not changing his phone number without court permission, not committing any offense while on bail, and surrendering his passport.

Date of Decision: May 2, 2024

Roshan Singh v. State of Haryana

Similar News