Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC

Police Cannot Seize Driving Licenses Merely Based on FIRs in IPC Offences: Madras High Court Upholds Rights of Drivers

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has reaffirmed the rights of drivers by ruling that the police do not have the authority to seize driving licenses merely based on the registration of FIRs for offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Justice B. Pugalendhi, presiding over the bench, delivered a landmark decision in the writ petitions filed by four drivers employed with the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation.

The petitioners, P. Prabu, A. Velsamy, E. Salaimanimadhavan, and R. Rajamanickam, approached the court seeking a writ of mandamus against the Regional Transport Officers and Inspectors of Police of various districts. They challenged the seizure of their driving licenses following accidents that resulted in criminal cases under Section 304 (A) IPC for causing death by negligence.

Justice Pugalendhi observed, “The respondent police cannot seize the driving license... it is not for the Regional Transport Authority to pre-judge the guilt of the petitioners, even before the filing of the final report by the respondent Police in the criminal cases registered against these petitioners.” This observation underscored the principle that an individual’s rights cannot be prematurely infringed based on an accusation.

The court referenced several precedents, including the cases of P. Sethuraman and S. Murugan, to establish the limits of police authority under Section 206 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The judgment highlighted that the seizure of the license is not mandatory for action under Section 19 of the Act and that police powers are restricted to specific sections of the Motor Vehicles Act.

The court ordered the respondent Regional Transport Officers to return the driving licenses of the petitioners within one week. It also permitted the respondent Police to forward relevant materials to the RTOs after filing the final reports in the criminal cases for appropriate action under Section 19 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

DATED: 12.01.2024

P.Prabu VS Regional Transport Officers and Inspectors of Police of various districts       

 

Latest Legal News