Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Right to Be Considered for Promotion, Not a Right to Promotion: Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Retrospective Promotion    |     Inherent Power of Courts Can Recall Admission of Insufficiently Stamped Documents: Supreme Court    |     Courts Cannot Substitute Their Opinion for Security Agencies in Threat Perception Assessments: J&K High Court Directs Reassessment of Political Leader's Threat Perception    |     Service Law | Violation of Natural Justice: Discharge Without Notice or Reason: Gauhati High Court Orders Reinstatement and Regularization of Circle Organizers    |     Jharkhand High Court Quashes Family Court Order, Reaffirms Jurisdiction Based on Minor’s Ordinary Residence in Delhi    |     Ex-Serviceman Status Ceases After First Employment in Government Job: Calcutta High Court Upholds SBI’s Cancellation of Ex-Serviceman's Appointment Over False Declaration of Employment    |     Maxim Res Ipsa Loquitur Applies When State Instrumentalities Are Directly Responsible: Delhi High Court Orders MCD to Pay ₹10 Lakhs Compensation for Death    |     Wilful Avoidance of Service Must Be Established Before Passing Ex Parte Order Under Section 126(2) CrPC: Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Maintenance Order    |     MP High Court Imposes Rs. 10,000 Costs for Prolonging Litigation, Upholds Eviction of Petitioners from Father's Property    |     When Detention Unnecessary Despite Serious Allegations of Fraud Bail Should be Granted: Kerala HC    |     Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Relocation Alone Cannot Justify Transfer: Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Move Case from Nellore to Delhi, Orders Fresh Probe    |     Punjab & Haryana HC Double Bench Upholds Protection for Married Partners in Live-In Relationships, Denies Same for Minors    |    

Police Cannot Seize Driving Licenses Merely Based on FIRs in IPC Offences: Madras High Court Upholds Rights of Drivers

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has reaffirmed the rights of drivers by ruling that the police do not have the authority to seize driving licenses merely based on the registration of FIRs for offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Justice B. Pugalendhi, presiding over the bench, delivered a landmark decision in the writ petitions filed by four drivers employed with the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation.

The petitioners, P. Prabu, A. Velsamy, E. Salaimanimadhavan, and R. Rajamanickam, approached the court seeking a writ of mandamus against the Regional Transport Officers and Inspectors of Police of various districts. They challenged the seizure of their driving licenses following accidents that resulted in criminal cases under Section 304 (A) IPC for causing death by negligence.

Justice Pugalendhi observed, “The respondent police cannot seize the driving license... it is not for the Regional Transport Authority to pre-judge the guilt of the petitioners, even before the filing of the final report by the respondent Police in the criminal cases registered against these petitioners.” This observation underscored the principle that an individual’s rights cannot be prematurely infringed based on an accusation.

The court referenced several precedents, including the cases of P. Sethuraman and S. Murugan, to establish the limits of police authority under Section 206 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The judgment highlighted that the seizure of the license is not mandatory for action under Section 19 of the Act and that police powers are restricted to specific sections of the Motor Vehicles Act.

The court ordered the respondent Regional Transport Officers to return the driving licenses of the petitioners within one week. It also permitted the respondent Police to forward relevant materials to the RTOs after filing the final reports in the criminal cases for appropriate action under Section 19 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

DATED: 12.01.2024

P.Prabu VS Regional Transport Officers and Inspectors of Police of various districts       

 

Similar News