Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

Police Cannot Seize Driving Licenses Merely Based on FIRs in IPC Offences: Madras High Court Upholds Rights of Drivers

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has reaffirmed the rights of drivers by ruling that the police do not have the authority to seize driving licenses merely based on the registration of FIRs for offences under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Justice B. Pugalendhi, presiding over the bench, delivered a landmark decision in the writ petitions filed by four drivers employed with the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation.

The petitioners, P. Prabu, A. Velsamy, E. Salaimanimadhavan, and R. Rajamanickam, approached the court seeking a writ of mandamus against the Regional Transport Officers and Inspectors of Police of various districts. They challenged the seizure of their driving licenses following accidents that resulted in criminal cases under Section 304 (A) IPC for causing death by negligence.

Justice Pugalendhi observed, “The respondent police cannot seize the driving license... it is not for the Regional Transport Authority to pre-judge the guilt of the petitioners, even before the filing of the final report by the respondent Police in the criminal cases registered against these petitioners.” This observation underscored the principle that an individual’s rights cannot be prematurely infringed based on an accusation.

The court referenced several precedents, including the cases of P. Sethuraman and S. Murugan, to establish the limits of police authority under Section 206 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The judgment highlighted that the seizure of the license is not mandatory for action under Section 19 of the Act and that police powers are restricted to specific sections of the Motor Vehicles Act.

The court ordered the respondent Regional Transport Officers to return the driving licenses of the petitioners within one week. It also permitted the respondent Police to forward relevant materials to the RTOs after filing the final reports in the criminal cases for appropriate action under Section 19 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

DATED: 12.01.2024

P.Prabu VS Regional Transport Officers and Inspectors of Police of various districts       

 

Latest Legal News