Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

P&H High Court - Grants OCI Students Equal Access to MBBS Course Under General Category

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh, delivered a verdict in favor of Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) students seeking admission to the MBBS Course under the General Category. The court declared that OCI card holders are entitled to the same benefits as Indian citizens for MBBS admissions, dispelling the restrictions that confined them to the NRI Quota.

Chief Justice Ravi Shanker Jha and Justice Arun Palli presided over the case of Aqeeq Mann, a minor represented by his father, who petitioned against the denial of access to the General Category despite securing a rank in the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET)-2023.

"OCI candidates are entitled to the same benefits, that are being given to the NRI candidates... the notification... providing that OCI card holders would be eligible for admission against the seats reserved for NRI candidates only, has been quashed." (Paragraph 4)

The petition, filed against Clause 17 (vi) of the impugned notification issued by the Government of Punjab, Department of Medical & Research (Health-III Branch), contended that such restrictions were illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of constitutional provisions.

"The authorities have not examined and decided the issues raised by the petitioner in the petition... appropriate orders be passed." (Paragraph 5)

Highlighting a previous Supreme Court ruling in the case of Anushka Rengunthwar & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors., which granted parity to OCI candidates with NRI candidates, the petitioner sought equal opportunities under the General Category.

Recognizing the urgency of the matter, the court directed the concerned authorities to decide on the petitioner's case immediately, considering all aspects and NEET-related guidelines.

The landmark judgment paves the way for OCI students aspiring to pursue MBBS in the State of Punjab, allowing them equal access to the General Category seats and ensuring a fair and equitable admission process.

The ruling has significant implications for OCI students across the country, emphasizing equal opportunities in higher education and upholding the principles of equality enshrined in the Constitution of India.

Date Of Decision: 20th July 2023

 

Aqeeq Mann (minor) through his father and natural guardian vs State of Punjab and others        

Latest Legal News