Gratuity Is a Property Right, Not a Charity: MP High Court Upholds Gratuity Claims of Long-Term Contract Workers Seized Vehicles Must Not Be Left to Rot in Open Yards: Madras High Court Invokes Article 21, Orders Release of Vehicle Seized in Illegal Quarrying Case Even After Talaq And A Settlement, A Divorced Muslim Woman Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CRPC: Kerala High Court Bail Cannot Be Withheld as Punishment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail to Govt Official in ₹200 Cr. Scholarship Scam Citing Delay and Article 21 Violation Custodial Interrogation Necessary in Serious Economic Offences: Delhi High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail in ₹1.91 Cr Housing Scam Specific Relief Act | Readiness and Willingness Must Be Real and Continuous — Plaintiffs Cannot Withhold Funds and Blame the Seller: Bombay High Court Even If Claim Is Styled Under Section 163A, It Can Be Treated Under Section 166 If Negligence Is Pleaded And Higher Compensation Is Claimed: Supreme Court When Cheating Flows from One Criminal Conspiracy, the Law Does Not Demand 1852 FIRs: Supreme Court Upholds Single FIR in Multi-Crore Cheating Case Initiating Multiple FIRs on Same Facts is Impermissible: Supreme Court Quashes Parallel FIRs and Grants Bail Protection in Refund Case Not Every Middleman Is a Trafficker: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail in International Cyber Trafficking Case, Cites Absence of Mens Rea Stay in One Corner Freezes the Whole Map: Madras High Court Upholds Validity of Decades-Old Land Acquisition Despite 11-Year Delay in Award Parole Once Granted Cannot Be Made Illusory by Imposing Impossible Conditions: Rajasthan High Court Declares Mechanical Surety Requirement for Indigent Convicts Unconstitutional Once Acquisition Is Complete, Title Disputes Fall Outside Civil Court Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Appeal Lies Against Lok Adalat Compromise Decree Even on Grounds of Fraud: Orissa High Court Declares First Appeal Not Maintainable Sanction to Prosecute Under UAPA Cannot Be a Mechanical Act: Supreme Court Quashes Jharkhand Government’s Third-Time Sanction Without New Evidence FIRs in Corruption Cases Cannot Be Quashed on Hyper-Technical Grounds of Police Station Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Restores ACB Investigations Quashed by Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Completion of Ayurvedic Nursing Training Does Not Confer Right to Appointment: Supreme Court Rejects Legitimate Expectation Claim by Trainees University’s Error Can’t Cost a Student Her Future: Supreme Court Directs Manav Bharti University to Issue Withheld Degree and Marksheets Due to Clerical Mistake Disciplinary Exoneration Cannot Shield Public Servant from Criminal Trial in Corruption Cases: Supreme Court Customs Tariff Act | ‘End Use’ and ‘Common Parlance’ Tests Cannot Override Statutory Context: Supreme Court Classifies Mushroom Shelves as ‘Aluminium Structures’ Supreme Court Allows PIL Against Limited Maternity Benefits for Adoptive Mothers to Continue Under New Social Security Code Liberty Cannot Wait for Endless Trials: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Wadhawan Brothers in ₹57,000 Crore DHFL Scam Co-Sharer Has Superior Right of Pre-emption Even If Land Is Gair Mumkin Bara: Punjab & Haryana High Court Neighbours Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC Merely For Alleged Instigation: Karnataka High Court No Party Has a Right to Demand a Local Commissioner — It's Purely the Court’s Discretion: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Civil Revision

P&H High Court - Grants OCI Students Equal Access to MBBS Course Under General Category

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh, delivered a verdict in favor of Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) students seeking admission to the MBBS Course under the General Category. The court declared that OCI card holders are entitled to the same benefits as Indian citizens for MBBS admissions, dispelling the restrictions that confined them to the NRI Quota.

Chief Justice Ravi Shanker Jha and Justice Arun Palli presided over the case of Aqeeq Mann, a minor represented by his father, who petitioned against the denial of access to the General Category despite securing a rank in the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET)-2023.

"OCI candidates are entitled to the same benefits, that are being given to the NRI candidates... the notification... providing that OCI card holders would be eligible for admission against the seats reserved for NRI candidates only, has been quashed." (Paragraph 4)

The petition, filed against Clause 17 (vi) of the impugned notification issued by the Government of Punjab, Department of Medical & Research (Health-III Branch), contended that such restrictions were illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of constitutional provisions.

"The authorities have not examined and decided the issues raised by the petitioner in the petition... appropriate orders be passed." (Paragraph 5)

Highlighting a previous Supreme Court ruling in the case of Anushka Rengunthwar & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors., which granted parity to OCI candidates with NRI candidates, the petitioner sought equal opportunities under the General Category.

Recognizing the urgency of the matter, the court directed the concerned authorities to decide on the petitioner's case immediately, considering all aspects and NEET-related guidelines.

The landmark judgment paves the way for OCI students aspiring to pursue MBBS in the State of Punjab, allowing them equal access to the General Category seats and ensuring a fair and equitable admission process.

The ruling has significant implications for OCI students across the country, emphasizing equal opportunities in higher education and upholding the principles of equality enshrined in the Constitution of India.

Date Of Decision: 20th July 2023

 

Aqeeq Mann (minor) through his father and natural guardian vs State of Punjab and others        

Latest Legal News