Writ Jurisdiction Not Appropriate For Adjudicating Complex Title Disputes; Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Madhya Pradesh High Court Joint Account Holder Not Liable Under Section 138 NI Act If Not A Signatory To Dishonoured Cheque: Allahabad High Court Private Individuals Accepting Money Can Be Prosecuted Under MPID Act; Nomenclature As 'Loan' Irrelevant: Supreme Court Nomenclature Of Transaction As 'Loan' Irrelevant; If Ingredients Met, It Is A 'Deposit' Under MPID Act: Supreme Court Pleadings Must State Material Facts, Not Evidence; Deficiency In Pleading Cannot Be Raised For First Time In Appeal: Supreme Court Denial Of Remission Cannot Rest Solely On Heinousness Of Crime; Justice Doesn't Permit Permanent Incarceration In Shadow Of Worst Act: Supreme Court Second Application For Rejection Of Plaint Barred By Res Judicata If Earlier Order Attained Finality: Supreme Court Section 6(5) Hindu Succession Act Is A Saving Clause, Not A Jurisdictional Bar To Partition Suits: Supreme Court Sale Of Natural Gas Via Common Carrier Pipelines Is An Inter-State Sale; UP Has No Jurisdiction To Levy VAT: Supreme Court Mediclaim Reimbursement Not Deductible From Motor Accident Compensation; Tortfeasor Can’t Benefit From Claimant’s Prudence: Supreme Court Rules Of Procedure Are Handmaid Of Justice, Not Mistress; Striking Off Defence Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Not Mechanical: Supreme Court Power To Strike Off Tenant's Defense Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Discretionary, Not To Be Exercised Mechanically: Supreme Court Areas Urbanised Before 1959 Don't Require Separate Notification To Fall Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Delhi High Court Police Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts To Perform Compensatory Justice; Direct Nexus With Offence Essential: Bombay High Court FSL Probe Before Electronic Evidence Meets Section 65B Admissibility Standards: Gujarat High Court Court Shouldn't Adjudicate Rights At Stage Of Granting Leave Under Section 92 CPC, Only Prima Facie Case Required: Allahabad High Court Right To Seek Bail Based On Non-Furnishing Of 'Grounds Of Arrest' Applies Only Prospectively From November 6, 2025: Madras High Court Prior Exposure To Accused Before TIP Renders Identification Meaningless: Delhi High Court Acquits Four In Uphaar Cinema Murder Case No Particular Format Prescribed For 'Proposed Resolution' In No-Confidence Motion; Intention Of Members To Be Gathered From Document As A Whole: Orissa High Court Trial Court Cannot Grant Temporary Injunction Without Adverting To Allegations Of Fraud And Collusion: Calcutta High Court "Ganja" Definition Under NDPS Act Excludes Roots & Stems: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail As Seized Weight Included Whole Plants Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Doesn't Displace Section 37 NDPS Mandate In Commercial Quantity Cases: Orissa High Court

P&H High Court - Grants OCI Students Equal Access to MBBS Course Under General Category

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh, delivered a verdict in favor of Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) students seeking admission to the MBBS Course under the General Category. The court declared that OCI card holders are entitled to the same benefits as Indian citizens for MBBS admissions, dispelling the restrictions that confined them to the NRI Quota.

Chief Justice Ravi Shanker Jha and Justice Arun Palli presided over the case of Aqeeq Mann, a minor represented by his father, who petitioned against the denial of access to the General Category despite securing a rank in the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET)-2023.

"OCI candidates are entitled to the same benefits, that are being given to the NRI candidates... the notification... providing that OCI card holders would be eligible for admission against the seats reserved for NRI candidates only, has been quashed." (Paragraph 4)

The petition, filed against Clause 17 (vi) of the impugned notification issued by the Government of Punjab, Department of Medical & Research (Health-III Branch), contended that such restrictions were illegal, arbitrary, and in violation of constitutional provisions.

"The authorities have not examined and decided the issues raised by the petitioner in the petition... appropriate orders be passed." (Paragraph 5)

Highlighting a previous Supreme Court ruling in the case of Anushka Rengunthwar & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors., which granted parity to OCI candidates with NRI candidates, the petitioner sought equal opportunities under the General Category.

Recognizing the urgency of the matter, the court directed the concerned authorities to decide on the petitioner's case immediately, considering all aspects and NEET-related guidelines.

The landmark judgment paves the way for OCI students aspiring to pursue MBBS in the State of Punjab, allowing them equal access to the General Category seats and ensuring a fair and equitable admission process.

The ruling has significant implications for OCI students across the country, emphasizing equal opportunities in higher education and upholding the principles of equality enshrined in the Constitution of India.

Date Of Decision: 20th July 2023

 

Aqeeq Mann (minor) through his father and natural guardian vs State of Punjab and others        

Latest Legal News