Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

PAYMENT OF GRATUITY: MAXIMUM LIMIT NOT APPLICABLE TO RETIRED STATE ENGINEER: Entitlement to Claim Interest for Delayed Disbursement – KERALA HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Kerala High Court, presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice Murali Purushothaman, addressed the issue of gratuity payment to a retired Regional State Engineer from the Kerala State Housing Board. The court ruled that the maximum gratuity limit under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, does not apply to the petitioner, K. Rajendra Prasad, as he is governed by the Kerala Service Rules. The court emphasized that the provisions of the Payment of Gratuity Act hold precedence over other enactments.

The court stated, "The employees of the Board can claim gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and not under the Kerala Service Rules. They cannot have gratuity under the KSR with the ceiling limit payable under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and vice versa."

The petitioner had sought the maximum gratuity of Rs. 10,00,000/- under section 4(3) of the Act, as amended in 2010. However, the court clarified that the maximum gratuity amount is determined based on the date on which the gratuity becomes payable and not the date of sanction or disbursement. Therefore, the petitioner's claim for the maximum amount was dismissed.

Regarding the delayed disbursement of the petitioner's Death-Cum-Retirement Gratuity (DCRG), the court left open the entitlement to claim interest. The petitioner was advised to approach the Kerala State Housing Board for interest, and the board was directed to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders within two months.

This judgment serves as a significant clarification on the applicability of gratuity provisions for employees under the Kerala State Housing Board. The court's ruling ensures the precedence of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, in determining gratuity entitlement, bringing clarity to similar cases in the future.

"The employees of the Board can claim gratuity in terms of section 4(3) [of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972]...they cannot claim gratuity available under the KSR."

The petitioner's counsel expressed satisfaction with the court's decision, stating, "While we respect the court's ruling, we will pursue the petitioner's entitlement to claim interest for the delayed disbursement of DCRG as directed."

Date of Decision: May 22, 2023

 RAJENDRA PRASAD REGIONAL vs STATE OF KERALA

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/K.-Rajendra-Prasad-V-State-Of-Kerala-22-May-Kerala-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News