Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers    |     Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court    |     Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case    |     Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case    |     Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute    |     Paternity Established Through SSC and Appointment Order, Legal Obligation to Maintain Unmarried Daughter: Andhra Pradesh High Court    |     No Appeal Shall Be Heard Without Disputed Tax Deposit: Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006    |     Parties Must Choose Peace Over Litigation: Calcutta High Court Denies FIR Quashing in Family Dispute, Highlights Mediation Option    |     Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Recruitment of 1091 Assistant Professors and 67 Librarians In Punjab Due to Procedural Flaws    |     Res Judicata Bars Reconsideration of Adoption Validity in Second Round of Litigation: Jammu & Kashmir High Court    |     Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection    |     Inconsistencies in Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Forensic Certainty Lead to Acquittal: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case    |     Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 Due to Invalid Sanction by JCIT    |     Summons Under PMLA for Further Investigation Does Not Infringe Right Against Self-Incrimination: Telangana HC    |     Termination During Probation Is Lawful if Concealment of Criminal Case Is Proven: Allahabad HC    |     Disproportionate Fine Cannot Be Imposed for Recovery of 1 Liter of Country-made Liquor: Patna High Court    |     Prosecution failed to prove identity of remains and establish murder beyond reasonable doubt: Orissa High Court Acquit Ex-Husband    |     Despite 12 Injuries on the Victim, No Intention to Kill Found: Rajasthan High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC    |     Governor’s sanction suffers from non-application of mind: Karnataka High Court Stays Governor’s Sanction for Investigation Against CM Siddaramaiah    |    

P&H High Court Modifies Compensation Award in Motor Accident Case, Ensures Fair Apportionment

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, presided over by HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI, delivered a verdict modifying the compensation awarded in a motor accident case. The judgment, pronounced on 03.10.2023, addressed disputes regarding the calculation of compensation, apportionment among claimants, and relevant legal principles.

The court observed, "Motor Accident Compensation – Appeal against an award by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal – Appellant, HDFC ERGO General Insurance Co. Ltd., challenges the award granting compensation to the claimants – Dispute related to the calculation of compensation." The judgment delved into the intricacies of assessing compensation in cases involving fatal motor accidents.

The primary contention revolved around the calculation of compensation, with the appellant contending that the awarded amount was excessive. The dispute focused on the evaluation of the deceased's income, consideration of future prospects, and the deduction of personal expenses. The court referred to several legal precedents to navigate this complex issue. "Calculation of Compensation – Appellant argues that excessive compensation was awarded – Disagreement on the assessment of the deceased's income, future prospects, and personal expenses deduction – Reference to legal precedents for deduction and compensation calculations," the court noted.

Crucially, the court addressed the apportionment of compensation among the claimants. The judgment emphasized fairness and modified the apportionment in favor of the main sufferer, Ram Rati, the widow of the deceased. "Apportionment of Compensation – Discussion on the distribution of compensation among the claimants – Decision to modify the apportionment in favor of the main sufferer, Ram Rati, the widow of the deceased," the court stated, highlighting its commitment to ensuring justice for the affected parties.

This judgment underscores the importance of a meticulous assessment of compensation in motor accident cases and the equitable distribution thereof. It also showcases the court's dedication to upholding fairness and justice in such matters.

Date of Decision: 03.10.2023

HDFC ERGO General Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Ram Rati and others   

                 

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Hdfc_Ergo_General_Insurance_Co_Ltd_vs_Ram_Rati_And_Ors_on_3_October_2023.pdf"]

Similar News