No Work No Pay: Delhi High Court Denies Back Wages To Reinstated Army Officer State Cannot Use 'Delay & Laches' To Evade Compensation For Land Taken Without Authority Of Law: Calcutta High Court Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Jail Appeal Solely On 3157-Day Delay; Orders Release Of Life Convict After 22 Years In Jail 138 NI Act | Failure To Produce Income Tax Returns Not Fatal To Cheque Bounce Case If Debt Is Established: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Public Records Not In Party's 'Power Or Possession' Until Actually Obtained; Leave Not Required For Rebuttal Documents: AP High Court For Conviction Under Section 34 IPC, Prosecution Must Establish Prior Meeting Of Minds & Pre-Arranged Plan: Allahabad High Court Merciless Beating With Blunt Side Of Deadly Weapons To Spread Terror Constitutes Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court CIT Can’t Invoke Revisionary Jurisdiction Merely Because AO’s Enquiry Was ‘Inadequate’ If View Is Plausible: Bombay High Court Mere Presence At Crime Scene Without Proof Of Prior Concert Insufficient To Invoke Section 34 IPC For Murder: Supreme Court Courts Cannot Be Used As Tools For Coercion: Bombay HC Dismisses Application To Implead Developer Without Contractual Nexus, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Cost Specific Performance Cannot Be Granted For Contingent Contracts Dependent On Third-Party Conveyance: Madras High Court Unlawful Subletting Is A ‘Continuing Wrong’, Fresh Limitation Period Runs As Long As Breach Continues: Bombay High Court Courts Must Specify Payment Timeline In Specific Performance Decrees; Order XX Rule 12A CPC Is Mandatory: Supreme Court Specific Performance Decree Does Not Automatically Rescind Due To Delay; Courts Can Extend Time For Deposit: Supreme Court Madras High Court Quashes Forgery Case Against Mahindra World City After Victims Accept Alternate Land In Settlement Motor Accident Claims: 13-Day FIR Delay Not Fatal; 80% Physical Disability Can Be Treated As 100% Functional Disability: Punjab & Haryana HC Murderer Cannot Inherit Property From Victim Through Wills; Section 25 Hindu Succession Act Bar Applies To Testamentary Succession: Supreme Court Courts Must Pierce Veil Of Clever Drafting To Reject Suits Barred By Benami Law; 2016 Amendments Are Retrospective: Supreme Court Indian Railways Is A Consumer, Not A Deemed Distribution Licensee; Must Pay Cross-Subsidy Surcharge For Open Access: Supreme Court Technical Rules Of Evidence Act Do Not Apply To Departmental Enquiries: Supreme Court Public Employment Cannot Be Converted Into An Instrument Of Fraud; Police Personnel Using Dual Identity Strikes At Root Of Service: Supreme Court

Orders Appointment Without Terminating Existing Lecturer Amid Vacant Posts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Justice and Equity

17 September 2024 8:13 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur delivered a significant ruling in the case of Gauri Shankar Jinger vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11875/2023). The court addressed the issue of appointment to the post of College Lecturer (Philosophy) and ruled in favor of granting appointment to Gauri Shankar Jinger while allowing the continuance of Jhanwar Ram, citing principles of justice, equity, and good conscience.

The case originated when Gauri Shankar Jinger applied for the post of College Lecturer (Philosophy) following an advertisement issued on January 12, 2015. His candidature was initially rejected due to not meeting the 'good academic record' criteria. Later, the University Grants Commission's Regulation 2010 was amended to allow a 5% relaxation for SC/ST and PH candidates, leading to the reconsideration of his application. In light of this, Gauri Shankar Jinger was recommended for the position by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) in September 2022.

Jhanwar Ram, who was already serving as a College Lecturer, received a show-cause notice following this development. He challenged this notice, leading to a stay on further proceedings against him. Both Gauri Shankar Jinger and Jhanwar Ram then filed petitions before the court.

The primary legal issue was whether Gauri Shankar Jinger should be appointed as per the revised criteria and if Jhanwar Ram should be removed to accommodate him. The court had to balance the revised eligibility criteria for 'good academic record' and the principles of equity and justice concerning Jhanwar Ram's current employment.

Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur observed that while Gauri Shankar Jinger now met the eligibility criteria after the relaxation, Jhanwar Ram had been appointed in good faith and had been serving diligently. The court noted that there were 17 vacant posts of Lecturer (Philosophy) in the department, suggesting that both parties could be accommodated.

Citing a prior decision in Neeraj Kumari Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., the court emphasized that individuals appointed without any fraud or misrepresentation cannot be ousted from their employment. The court stated, "It is not only within its power but also the duty of the High Court while exercising such power to advance the ends of justice and to uproot injustice."

In balancing the equities, the court directed the state to appoint Gauri Shankar Jinger as College Lecturer (Philosophy) within four weeks, providing him with notional benefits from the date of Jhanwar Ram’s appointment. Simultaneously, Jhanwar Ram was allowed to continue in his post, effectively protecting his employment while ensuring justice for both parties.

Date of Decision: September 3, 2024

Gauri Shankar Jinger vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Latest Legal News