Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal GST Officer Froze Business Accounts Without Any Legal Basis, Ignored Taxpayer for Three Months: Bombay High Court Imposes Personal Costs Weapon Recovered, But No Forensic Report, No Independent Witness — Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused

Orders Appointment Without Terminating Existing Lecturer Amid Vacant Posts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Justice and Equity

17 September 2024 8:13 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur delivered a significant ruling in the case of Gauri Shankar Jinger vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11875/2023). The court addressed the issue of appointment to the post of College Lecturer (Philosophy) and ruled in favor of granting appointment to Gauri Shankar Jinger while allowing the continuance of Jhanwar Ram, citing principles of justice, equity, and good conscience.

The case originated when Gauri Shankar Jinger applied for the post of College Lecturer (Philosophy) following an advertisement issued on January 12, 2015. His candidature was initially rejected due to not meeting the 'good academic record' criteria. Later, the University Grants Commission's Regulation 2010 was amended to allow a 5% relaxation for SC/ST and PH candidates, leading to the reconsideration of his application. In light of this, Gauri Shankar Jinger was recommended for the position by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) in September 2022.

Jhanwar Ram, who was already serving as a College Lecturer, received a show-cause notice following this development. He challenged this notice, leading to a stay on further proceedings against him. Both Gauri Shankar Jinger and Jhanwar Ram then filed petitions before the court.

The primary legal issue was whether Gauri Shankar Jinger should be appointed as per the revised criteria and if Jhanwar Ram should be removed to accommodate him. The court had to balance the revised eligibility criteria for 'good academic record' and the principles of equity and justice concerning Jhanwar Ram's current employment.

Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur observed that while Gauri Shankar Jinger now met the eligibility criteria after the relaxation, Jhanwar Ram had been appointed in good faith and had been serving diligently. The court noted that there were 17 vacant posts of Lecturer (Philosophy) in the department, suggesting that both parties could be accommodated.

Citing a prior decision in Neeraj Kumari Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., the court emphasized that individuals appointed without any fraud or misrepresentation cannot be ousted from their employment. The court stated, "It is not only within its power but also the duty of the High Court while exercising such power to advance the ends of justice and to uproot injustice."

In balancing the equities, the court directed the state to appoint Gauri Shankar Jinger as College Lecturer (Philosophy) within four weeks, providing him with notional benefits from the date of Jhanwar Ram’s appointment. Simultaneously, Jhanwar Ram was allowed to continue in his post, effectively protecting his employment while ensuring justice for both parties.

Date of Decision: September 3, 2024

Gauri Shankar Jinger vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Latest Legal News