Supreme Court Modifies Directive On Sanitary Napkins In Schools, Mandates Use Of Sustainable Biodegradable And Compostable Materials Actus Curiae Neminem Gravabit | Courts Must Invoke Equitable Principles To Exempt E-Filing Delays Caused By System Failures: Supreme Court Section 47 & 48 BNSS | Substantial Compliance With Statutory Safeguards Regarding Grounds Of Arrest Sufficient To Sustain Custody: Allahabad High Court Order I Rule 10 CPC | Third Parties Claiming Independent Title Cannot Be Impleaded In Specific Performance Suits Against Plaintiff's Wish: Andhra Pradesh High Court Licensing Authority Cannot Refuse Orchestra Licence On Vague Grounds Of 'Law And Order' Without Objective Material: Bombay High Court Order Of Evacuation Under Sec 37A WB Fire Services Act Must Reflect Application Of Mind To Petitioner’s Reply: Calcutta High Court Suppression Of Criminal Antecedents | Employer Must Apply Mind To Nature Of Offence And Age Of Candidate Before Cancelling Candidature: Allahabad High Court Trial Court Cannot Pass Ex Parte Decree As If It Were Contested Merits Without Notice To Party Upon Counsel’s Withdrawal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suit For Partition Not Maintainable Without Seeking Relief Of Possession If Plaintiff Is Not In Physical Or Constructive Possession: Delhi High Court Section 482 CrPC | High Court Can Quash Matrimonial FIRs Based On Amicable Settlement To Prevent Abuse Of Process: Gujarat High Court Mere Acquittal In Criminal Case Does Not Establish Malicious Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reiterates Essential Ingredients Under Tort Law Revenue Records Do Not Confer Title; Authorities Must Record Registered Deeds Promptly To Prevent Fraudulent Transfers: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 24 CPC | Paramount Consideration In Transfer Of Matrimonial Proceedings Is Convenience Of Wife: Orissa High Court Section 318 BNS | FIR Quashed As Court Finds Criminal Prosecution Being Used To Settle A Purely Civil Commercial Dispute: J&K High Court Principles Of Res Judicata And Delay Bar State From Reopening Decades-Old Land Tribunal Orders: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Has Discretion To Refuse Summoning Of Defence Witnesses If Application Is Vexatious Or Aimed At Delay: Kerala High Court Co-Owner’s Exclusive Possession And Non-Participation In Profits For Decades Can Raise Presumption Of Ouster: Madras High Court Competition Commission Of India Has Jurisdiction To Probe Anti-Competitive Conduct In Liquor Trade Despite State Regulatory Framework: Madhya Pradesh High Court Plaintiff Cannot Seek Title Declaration Without Proving Ownership And Precise Identity Of Disputed Property: Punjab And Haryana High Court Settlement Deed Excluding Legal Heirs From Intestate Succession Cannot Override Statutory Inheritance Rights: Madras High Court

Orders Appointment Without Terminating Existing Lecturer Amid Vacant Posts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms Justice and Equity

17 September 2024 8:13 PM

By: Deepak Kumar


Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur delivered a significant ruling in the case of Gauri Shankar Jinger vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11875/2023). The court addressed the issue of appointment to the post of College Lecturer (Philosophy) and ruled in favor of granting appointment to Gauri Shankar Jinger while allowing the continuance of Jhanwar Ram, citing principles of justice, equity, and good conscience.

The case originated when Gauri Shankar Jinger applied for the post of College Lecturer (Philosophy) following an advertisement issued on January 12, 2015. His candidature was initially rejected due to not meeting the 'good academic record' criteria. Later, the University Grants Commission's Regulation 2010 was amended to allow a 5% relaxation for SC/ST and PH candidates, leading to the reconsideration of his application. In light of this, Gauri Shankar Jinger was recommended for the position by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) in September 2022.

Jhanwar Ram, who was already serving as a College Lecturer, received a show-cause notice following this development. He challenged this notice, leading to a stay on further proceedings against him. Both Gauri Shankar Jinger and Jhanwar Ram then filed petitions before the court.

The primary legal issue was whether Gauri Shankar Jinger should be appointed as per the revised criteria and if Jhanwar Ram should be removed to accommodate him. The court had to balance the revised eligibility criteria for 'good academic record' and the principles of equity and justice concerning Jhanwar Ram's current employment.

Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur observed that while Gauri Shankar Jinger now met the eligibility criteria after the relaxation, Jhanwar Ram had been appointed in good faith and had been serving diligently. The court noted that there were 17 vacant posts of Lecturer (Philosophy) in the department, suggesting that both parties could be accommodated.

Citing a prior decision in Neeraj Kumari Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., the court emphasized that individuals appointed without any fraud or misrepresentation cannot be ousted from their employment. The court stated, "It is not only within its power but also the duty of the High Court while exercising such power to advance the ends of justice and to uproot injustice."

In balancing the equities, the court directed the state to appoint Gauri Shankar Jinger as College Lecturer (Philosophy) within four weeks, providing him with notional benefits from the date of Jhanwar Ram’s appointment. Simultaneously, Jhanwar Ram was allowed to continue in his post, effectively protecting his employment while ensuring justice for both parties.

Date of Decision: September 3, 2024

Gauri Shankar Jinger vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Latest Legal News