'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Order XLI Rule 5 CPC: Pendency of appeal is not stay on Decree held by Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Top Court has stated that Order XLI Rule 5 CPC does not provide a stay based only on the filing of an appeal.

In this instance, the petitioner asked the High Court to order the District Magistrate to issue a No Objection Certificate so that an HSD/MS retail outlet dealership could be opened on the property.

However, the High Court rejected the argument after observing that an appeal against the petitioner's favouring decree had been filed in the High Court and had not yet been heard. The petitioner filed a High Court petition challenging this ruling.

The High Court was not justified in denying the plea, according to the Bench of Justices AS Bopanna and Hima Kohli.

The Bench ruled that, in light of the rules of Order 41 Rule 5 CPC, the mere filing of an appeal would not serve as a stay until it is listed and there is an interim order.

As a result, the court accepted the plea and instructed the DM to note the decree and provide the petitioner with a NOC within two weeks.

The court made it clear that the outcome of the appeal, which is still pending in the High Court, would continue to be a factor in this order.

Sanjiv Kumar Singh

vs

State of Bihar

Download Judgment

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Sanjiv-Kumar-Singh-versus-State-of-Bihar.pdf"]

Latest Legal News