Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

Non-Compliance with Section 202 CrPC: High Court Sets Aside Summoning Order in Cheque Bounce Case Involving Non-Executive Directors

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside the summoning order against several petitioners, including Non-Executive Independent Directors of M/s Housing Development Infrastructure Limited (HDIL), in a case pertaining to the dishonour of cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Justice Harpreet Singh Brar, while delivering the judgment, emphasized the crucial aspect of jurisdiction and procedural compliance, particularly highlighting the non-compliance with Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) by the trial court.

The petitioners had approached the High Court seeking quashing of the summoning order dated 25.11.2019, passed by the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhiana. They argued that as Non-Executive Independent Directors, they were not involved in the day-to-day business of the accused company and had even resigned before the cheques were presented for encashment.

In his observation, Justice Brar stated, "Most of the petitioners are senior citizens and reside in Mumbai, and the drill of Section 202 of the Cr.P.C. was not followed." This was a critical point as the mandatory requirements of Section 202 were not fulfilled before issuing the process against the accused residing outside the local jurisdiction of the trial court.

The court relied on several precedents from the Supreme Court to support its decision, including the judgments in the cases of SMS Pharmaceuticals Ltd v. Neeta Bhalla and Girdhari Lal Gupta v. D.H. Mehta and another, which discuss the liability of directors not involved in the day-to-day operations of a company.

Ultimately, the High Court directed the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludhiana, to consider the matter afresh in accordance with the law, by taking recourse to Section 202 Cr.P.C. The Court also made it clear that its observations should not influence the trial court, which is to proceed uninfluenced by the High Court's observations.

Date of decision: 19.01.2024

LALIT MOHAN MEHTA AND OTHERS  VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER         

 

Latest Legal News