Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court

Non-Compliance with Mandatory Legal Requirements in Arrest Process Infringes Fundamental Rights – Punjab and Haryana High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a significant ruling, has set aside the arrest and remand orders of Dilbag Singh @ Dilbag Sandhu and Kulwinder Singh in a case under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. The decision underscores the criticality of adherence to statutory procedures in arrest and detention cases.

Legal Point: The Court deliberated on the legality of the arrest and detention of the petitioners under the provisions of the PMLA, 2002. The pivotal legal issue revolved around whether the procedures mandated by Section 19 of the PMLA were complied with during the arrest and remand of the petitioners.

Facts and Issues: The petitioners, Dilbag Singh and Kulwinder Singh, were arrested in connection with ECIR No.GNZO/19/2023, relating to various offenses under the Indian Penal Code. Their arrests raised questions about compliance with the statutory requirements of the PMLA, particularly the provision of immediate written grounds for arrest and the forwarding of materials to the Adjudicating Authority as required by Section 19(2).

Justice Vikas Bahl meticulously assessed the procedural aspects of the petitioners' arrest and detention. The Court found significant lapses in compliance with Section 19 of the PMLA, particularly the failure to provide written grounds of arrest immediately post-arrest and the non-forwarding of necessary materials to the Adjudicating Authority.

The Court emphasized the sanctity of individual liberty and the necessity of adhering to legal procedures, especially under special acts like the PMLA. It was observed that any deviation from prescribed procedures not only undermines the legality of the arrest but also infringes upon fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

Decision: The High Court declared the arrest and remand of the petitioners as void due to non-compliance with mandatory legal provisions of the PMLA. All subsequent actions based on these arrests were set aside. The Court ordered the immediate release of Dilbag Singh and Kulwinder Singh, unless they are required in connection with other cases. The judgment serves as a stern reminder to law enforcement agencies to uphold the rule of law and respect individual rights in the execution of their powers.

Date of Decision: February 8, 2024

Dilbag Singh @ Dilbag Sandhu VS Union Of India and Another

Latest Legal News