-
by Admin
07 May 2024 2:49 AM
The Delhi High Court, in a judgment delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Navin Chawla, has dismissed a defamation case, emphasizing the lack of specific details regarding the location of publication and its impact, leading to issues of territorial jurisdiction.
Legal Point of the Judgment: The judgment revolves around the importance of specific details concerning the location of publication in defamation cases, especially in the context of social media, to establish territorial jurisdiction.
Facts and Issues: Dr. Kiran Pal Singh approached the High Court challenging the dismissal of his criminal revision petition by the Principal District and Sessions Judge. The original complaint, alleging defamation by Purnima Singh through Facebook posts, was dismissed by the trial court for want of territorial jurisdiction, citing the absence of specifics on the place of publication and the consequent impact.
Court Assessment: Justice Navin Chawla observed, “They do not mention where the publication has taken place.” The Court underscored the necessity of specific details regarding the publication location and its impact for establishing territorial jurisdiction in defamation cases, particularly involving social media.
Decision: The High Court upheld the lower courts’ dismissals, reiterating the need for specific territorial details in such complaints. However, the dismissal does not affect the merits of the defamation claim, allowing the petitioner the option to file a new complaint in the appropriate jurisdiction.
Date of Decision: March 1, 2024
DR KIRAN PAL SINGH VERSUS PURNIMA SINGH
