Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

No Presumption of Revocation by Destruction Due to Unavailability of Original Will – Delhi High Court Upholds Maintainability of Probate Petition Based on Certified Copy of Registered Will

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal challenging the maintainability of a probate petition filed with a certified copy of a registered will, rejecting the presumption of will revocation due to the absence of the original document. The Court outlined the principles under which a certified copy can suffice in initiating probate proceedings.

The appellants contested the orders of a single judge permitting probate proceedings based on a certified copy of a registered will dated August 2, 2019, filed by respondent no. 1, the executor, citing the original will’s unavailability. The appellants argued that the original will’s absence mandates a presumption of revocation and disqualifies the petition’s maintainability.

The court referenced Supreme Court precedents emphasizing that the absence of an original will does not automatically lead to a presumption of its revocation. The presumption that a will was destroyed to revoke it is considered weak and easily rebuttable.

The certified copy of the will was deemed a preliminary piece of evidence sufficient to commence probate proceedings, awaiting further comprehensive evidence at trial.

Citing the case Durga Prashad vs. Debi Charan, the court noted that Indian courts must apply the presumption of will revocation with caution, often favoring the presumption that a will might have been misplaced, lost, or stolen rather than revoked.

The court clarified that Section 237 allows proceedings to commence with a copy if the original is untraceable, subject to proving its due execution and validity. Section 70, which outlines the modes of revocation, places the onus on the appellants to prove revocation, which they failed to do adequately.

The appellate court found the objections concerning the petition’s maintainability to be without merit and dismissed the appeal, directing that the original probate petition should proceed without re-raising these resolved issues.

Decision: The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court’s decision to allow the probate proceedings to continue based on the certified copy of the registered will, pending further verification and evidential proceedings during the trial phase.

Date of Decision: May 07, 2024

Sahil Marwah & Anr. Vs. Vikas Malhotra & Ors.

Latest Legal News