Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Contempt | Power to Punish Carries Within It the Power to Forgive: Supreme Court Sets Aside Jail Term for Director Who Criticised Judges Over Stray Dog Orders Seizure and Attachment Are Not Twins: Supreme Court Holds Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts in PC Act Cases Using CrPC Section 102 IBC | Pre-Existing Dispute Must Be Real, Not Moonshine: Supreme Court Restores Insolvency Proceedings, Says Admission Cannot Be Rejected Based on Spurious Defence Summons Under FEMA Are Civil in Nature – Section 160 CrPC Has No Role to Play: Delhi High Court Denies Exemption to Woman Petitioner from Personal Appearance Before ED Clear Admission in Ledger Is Sufficient for Summary Judgment: Delhi High Court Decrees ₹16.77 Cr in Favour of MSME Supplier Mere Allegation Under SC/ST Act Doesn’t Bar Bail When No Public Abuse Is Made Out: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Caste Atrocity Case Consent Of Girl Aged Above 16 Is Legally Valid Under Pre-2013 Law: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Rape Conviction Insurer Entitled to Recover Compensation from Owner When Driver Has No Licence or Fake Licence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Applies ‘Pay and Recover’ Doctrine Courts Cannot Rewrite Contracts Where Parties Have Failed to Clearly Define Property Terms: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Even Illegal Appointments Cannot Be Cancelled Without Hearing: Patna High Court Quashes Mass Termination Of Absorbed University Staff

No Presumption of Revocation by Destruction Due to Unavailability of Original Will – Delhi High Court Upholds Maintainability of Probate Petition Based on Certified Copy of Registered Will

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal challenging the maintainability of a probate petition filed with a certified copy of a registered will, rejecting the presumption of will revocation due to the absence of the original document. The Court outlined the principles under which a certified copy can suffice in initiating probate proceedings.

The appellants contested the orders of a single judge permitting probate proceedings based on a certified copy of a registered will dated August 2, 2019, filed by respondent no. 1, the executor, citing the original will’s unavailability. The appellants argued that the original will’s absence mandates a presumption of revocation and disqualifies the petition’s maintainability.

The court referenced Supreme Court precedents emphasizing that the absence of an original will does not automatically lead to a presumption of its revocation. The presumption that a will was destroyed to revoke it is considered weak and easily rebuttable.

The certified copy of the will was deemed a preliminary piece of evidence sufficient to commence probate proceedings, awaiting further comprehensive evidence at trial.

Citing the case Durga Prashad vs. Debi Charan, the court noted that Indian courts must apply the presumption of will revocation with caution, often favoring the presumption that a will might have been misplaced, lost, or stolen rather than revoked.

The court clarified that Section 237 allows proceedings to commence with a copy if the original is untraceable, subject to proving its due execution and validity. Section 70, which outlines the modes of revocation, places the onus on the appellants to prove revocation, which they failed to do adequately.

The appellate court found the objections concerning the petition’s maintainability to be without merit and dismissed the appeal, directing that the original probate petition should proceed without re-raising these resolved issues.

Decision: The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court’s decision to allow the probate proceedings to continue based on the certified copy of the registered will, pending further verification and evidential proceedings during the trial phase.

Date of Decision: May 07, 2024

Sahil Marwah & Anr. Vs. Vikas Malhotra & Ors.

Latest Legal News