Detailed Description Of Concealment Not Mandatory Under Section 27 Evidence Act: Bombay High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Child Is Not A Pawn To Prove Mother's Adultery: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Husband's DNA Test Petition In Desertion Divorce Case Shareholder Ratification Cannot Cure Fraud Under SEBI's PFUTP Regulations: Supreme Court Restores Rs. 70 Lakh Penalty on Company When High Court Judges Themselves Disagree on the Answer, Can a Law Graduate Be Penalised for Getting It Wrong? Supreme Court Says No Superficial Burns Don't Mean Silence: Supreme Court Explains Why 80-90% Burn Victim Could Still Make a Valid Dying Declaration Daughter's Eyewitness Account, Dying Declaration Seal Husband's Fate: Supreme Court Upholds Life Sentence for Wife-Burning Murder Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 106 Crore Compensation Claim; Directs SECL to Supply Coal to Prakash Industries at 2014 or 2019 Prices for Wrongfully Suspended Period Section 319 CrPC | Trial Court Cannot Conduct Mini Trial While Deciding Application to Summon Additional Accused: Supreme Court Accused Can't Be Left Without Documents To Defend: Calcutta High Court Directs Adjudicating Authority To First Decide Whether Complete 'Relied Upon Documents' Were Served In PMLA Proceedings Husband Who Took Voluntary Retirement at 47 Cannot Escape Maintenance Duty: Delhi High Court Upholds ₹10,000/Month to Wife and Daughter Cannot Claim Monopoly Over a Deity's Name: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Trademark Injunction Against 'Kshetrapal Construction' Eviction Appeal Cannot Require Actual Surrender Of Possession, Symbolic Possession Sufficient: J&K High Court Amendment Introducing Time-Barred Relief And Changing Nature Of Suit Cannot Be Allowed: Karnataka High Court Counter Claim Is An Independent Suit: MP High Court Rules Properties Beyond Territorial Jurisdiction Cannot Be Dragged Into Counter Claim Co-Sharer Cannot Be Bound By Passage Carved Out Without His Consent: Punjab & Haryana High Court Modifies Concurrent Decrees ‘Prima Facie True’ Is Enough to Deny Liberty: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses Bail in Babbar Khalsa Terror Conspiracy Case High Court Cannot Quash FIR for Forgery When Handwriting Expert's Report Is Still Awaited: Supreme Court Supreme Court Calls for Paternity Leave Law, Says Father's Absence in Child's Early Years Leaves a "Quiet Cost" That Lasts a Lifetime Three-Month Age Cap for Adoptive Mothers' Maternity Benefit Struck Down: Supreme Court Reads Down Section 60(4) of Social Security Code Bank Cannot Rely on Charter Party Agreement to Justify Remittance Contrary to Customer's Instructions: Supreme Court 19 Candidates Linked to Accused, Papers of Five Subjects Leaked: Allahabad High Court Upholds Cancellation of UP Assistant Professor Exam Result

No Presumption of Revocation by Destruction Due to Unavailability of Original Will – Delhi High Court Upholds Maintainability of Probate Petition Based on Certified Copy of Registered Will

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal challenging the maintainability of a probate petition filed with a certified copy of a registered will, rejecting the presumption of will revocation due to the absence of the original document. The Court outlined the principles under which a certified copy can suffice in initiating probate proceedings.

The appellants contested the orders of a single judge permitting probate proceedings based on a certified copy of a registered will dated August 2, 2019, filed by respondent no. 1, the executor, citing the original will’s unavailability. The appellants argued that the original will’s absence mandates a presumption of revocation and disqualifies the petition’s maintainability.

The court referenced Supreme Court precedents emphasizing that the absence of an original will does not automatically lead to a presumption of its revocation. The presumption that a will was destroyed to revoke it is considered weak and easily rebuttable.

The certified copy of the will was deemed a preliminary piece of evidence sufficient to commence probate proceedings, awaiting further comprehensive evidence at trial.

Citing the case Durga Prashad vs. Debi Charan, the court noted that Indian courts must apply the presumption of will revocation with caution, often favoring the presumption that a will might have been misplaced, lost, or stolen rather than revoked.

The court clarified that Section 237 allows proceedings to commence with a copy if the original is untraceable, subject to proving its due execution and validity. Section 70, which outlines the modes of revocation, places the onus on the appellants to prove revocation, which they failed to do adequately.

The appellate court found the objections concerning the petition’s maintainability to be without merit and dismissed the appeal, directing that the original probate petition should proceed without re-raising these resolved issues.

Decision: The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower court’s decision to allow the probate proceedings to continue based on the certified copy of the registered will, pending further verification and evidential proceedings during the trial phase.

Date of Decision: May 07, 2024

Sahil Marwah & Anr. Vs. Vikas Malhotra & Ors.

Latest Legal News