Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

No Injury, No Conviction - Necessity of Injury in Penetrative Sexual Assault Cases - Himachal Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, Himachal Pradesh High C ourt highlighted the significance of medical evidence in cases of penetrative sexual assault and underlined the necessity of injury as a crucial factor in such cases. The case in question involved allegations of penetrative sexual assault under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The court's observation came as a response to the prosecution's claims of penetrative sexual assault, which lacked supporting medical evidence. The judgment emphasized that medical examinations play a pivotal role in sexual assault cases, particularly in establishing whether injuries consistent with the alleged offense are present.

The court scrutinized the medical evidence presented in the case and found a stark contradiction between the prosecution's assertions and the medical findings. Notably, the medical examination of both the victim and the accused showed no signs of injury, casting doubt on the credibility of the allegations.

Furthermore, the court emphasized the importance of the victim's ability to identify the accused. In this case, the child victim was unable to positively identify the accused, raising further questions about the prosecution's claims.

The judgment also highlighted the failure to produce a key witness, which led to an adverse inference against the prosecution. This omission raised doubts about the accuracy of the prosecution's narrative.

Additionally, the court addressed the issue of proving the age of the child victim, a crucial element in such cases. It noted that the prosecution had failed to provide adequate evidence to establish the victim's age, which further weakened its case.

As a result of these critical observations, the court set aside the conviction and sentence of the accused and ordered the immediate release of the appellant. The court also directed the appellant to furnish personal bonds, with the stipulation that in the event of further legal proceedings, the appellant would appear before the appropriate authorities.

This judgment underscores the necessity of presenting robust medical evidence and ensuring the consistency of statements in sexual assault cases. It serves as a reminder of the importance of adhering to legal procedures and maintaining the credibility of the prosecution's case in order to secure convictions in such sensitive matters.

Date of Decision: 19-09-2023

TSEWANG vs STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

Similar News