Assault During Sudden Provocation Without Premeditated Intent To Kill Not Attempt To Murder: Karnataka High Court Converts Conviction To S.325 IPC Memorandum Recording Past Oral Family Settlement Doesn't Require Registration, Can Be Used To Prove Partition: Delhi High Court Counsel Cannot Sign Compromise Without Express Authorization From Client; 25-Year Delay No Bar To Setting Aside Illegal Decree: Supreme Court Courts Must Nip Bogus Litigation In The Bud: Supreme Court Rejects Plaint Filed After 38 Years For Specific Performance 'Chhole Bhature' Not An Essential Service: Supreme Court Quashes Chandigarh Notification Expanding Definition Of Street Vendors Remission Policy Framed Under Article 161 Cannot Be Overridden By Subsequent Statutory Policies; 2008 Policy Doesn't Supersede 2002 Policy: Supreme Court Non-Filing Of Additional Chargesheet Copies Under Section 193(8) BNSS Not A Ground For Default Bail: Supreme Court Candidate Must Disclose Spouse's Assets In Election Affidavit Even If Not Jointly Held: Supreme Court Error In Taking Cognizance Under Wrong Section A Curable Defect If No Failure Of Justice Caused: Supreme Court Section 12A Commercial Courts Act: Counter-Claim Must Independently Comply With Pre-Institution Mediation If Disputes Not Subjected To Prior Process: Delhi High Court Mere Recovery Of Weapons From Open Fields Accessible To All Not Sufficient To Establish Guilt: Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Investigation Not Biased Merely Because IO Is Subordinate To Complainant; Re-Investigation Can't Be Ordered After Cognizance Unless Miscarriage Of Justice Is Shown: Punjab & Haryana HC Section 9 A&C Act Relief Available Until Award Is Actually Enforced, Even After It Becomes Enforceable: Telangana High Court Matrimonial Litigations Must Not Degenerate Into Contests Of Mutual Humiliation By Weaponising Private Images: Delhi High Court Public Figures Must Be Thick-Skinned Towards Satirical Criticism: Delhi High Court Refuses To Block AI-Generated Content Against MP Raghav Chadha No Legal Presumption That Every Hindu Family Property Is Joint; Burden On Party Asserting HUF To Prove Ancestral Nucleus: Bombay High Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Judgments Relying On Fake AI-Generated Precedents

"No Caste No Religion" Certificate: Madras High Court Directs Authority To Issue Certificate To Actor Radhakrishnan Parthiban

24 April 2026 7:14 PM

By: Admin


Madras High Court, in a significant order, directed the revenue authorities to issue a "No Caste No Religion" certificate to eminent actor and filmmaker Radhakrishnan Parthiban.

A single-judge bench of Justice M. Dhandapani observed that the petitioner, who does not hold any belief regarding religion or community, is entitled to such a certificate in light of existing judicial precedents. The court emphasized that the state must act upon such applications within a reasonable timeframe, especially when the petitioner's identity is founded on a secular and non-denominational belief system.

Petitioner Seeks Legal Recognition Of Secular Identity

The petitioner, Radhakrishnan Parthiban, approached the High Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus after his application for a "No Caste No Religion" certificate remained pending with the authorities. Parthiban, a well-known figure in the film industry, asserted that he does not subscribe to any religious or caste-based affiliations. He initially submitted his application on March 20, 2026, to the Tahsildar of Velachery, which was subsequently transferred to the Tahsildar of Sholinganallur on jurisdictional grounds, but no final decision was communicated to him.

Court Examines Obligation To Process Non-Affiliation Applications

The primary question before the court was whether a citizen is entitled to a formal declaration from the state affirming their choice to not belong to any caste or religion. The court was also called upon to determine if the revenue authorities were bound to dispose of such applications in a time-bound manner, particularly when the petitioner relied on prior Division Bench rulings of the same court.

Petitioner Relies On Division Bench Precedent

During the proceedings, the counsel for the petitioner argued that the issue was no longer res integra and had been settled by the judiciary. The petitioner placed heavy reliance on a Division Bench order dated June 10, 2025, in W.A. No. 401 of 2025, where the court had specifically directed the issuance of such certificates to individuals seeking to renounce caste and religious identities.

Legal Entitlement To Secular Status

The petitioner’s counsel further contended that in view of the earlier judicial pronouncements, the Tahsildar was duty-bound to issue the certificate. The court noted the submission that the petitioner, as an actor and filmmaker, consciously chooses not to hold any belief with regard to religion and community, and seeks legal documentation to reflect this personal conviction.

State Concedes To Issuance Based On Prior Examples

The Government Advocate, representing the State, did not oppose the core of the petitioner’s prayer. He informed the court that a similar certificate had already been issued by the Tahsildar of Tirupattur as far back as February 5, 2019. The State's counsel gave a categorical undertaking to the court that "an appropriate order would be passed in favour of the petitioner by the 3rd respondent on or before 29.04.2026."

High Court Mandates Compliance Within One Week

Taking note of the State’s undertaking and the prevailing legal position, the court issued a peremptory direction to the Tahsildar of Sholinganallur. The bench made it clear that the certificate must be issued in accordance with the standards set by the Division Bench in 2025. Justice Dhandapani underscored the necessity of honoring the petitioner's choice by setting a strict deadline for the administrative action.

"No Caste No Religion" Certificate Must Be Issued By April 29

In its final directions, the court ordered that the "No Caste No Religion" certificate be issued to the petitioner on or before April 29, 2026. To ensure the implementation of its order, the court listed the matter for reporting compliance on the same date. The ruling reinforces the individual's right to an identity free from traditional social stratifications and mandates the executive to facilitate such secular declarations.

The writ petition was disposed of with a clear mandate for the revenue authorities to recognize the petitioner’s non-religious status. By setting a specific deadline and requiring a compliance report, the High Court has ensured that the administrative delay in processing such sensitive identity-related applications is curtailed, upholding the spirit of personal liberty and secularism.

Date of Decision: 20 April 2026

Latest Legal News