Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

NDPS - Non-Compliance of Sampling Procedure Entitles Applicant to Bail: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court today granted bail to Gurpreet Singh, who had been in custody since June 8, 2021, in connection with a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). Justice Navin Chawla, presiding over the case, underscored key procedural lapses and excessive delay in the trial as grounds for the decision.

Gurpreet Singh was apprehended with 26.790 kgs of Cannabis, leading to charges under Sections 20/61/85 of the NDPS Act. His bail application highlighted the violation of prescribed sampling procedures and the prolonged duration of the trial, which has only seen partial examination of two out of 22 witnesses in over three years.

In his judgment, Justice Chawla observed, “In the present case, therefore, as there is a non-compliance with the procedure prescribed for sampling, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.” This observation reflects the court’s acknowledgment of procedural flaws in the handling of the seized Cannabis.

The court also considered the undue delay In the trial process. “Only two out of 22 witnesses have been examined in the trial, that that too only partially; coupled with the other factors as have been discussed in this judgment, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on account of the delay in trial and there being no likelihood of it being concluded in the near future,” Justice Chawla added.

The prosecution's argument that stringent bail criteria set by Section 37 of the NDPS Act for offences involving commercial quantities should be upheld was considered but ultimately did not sway the court’s decision.

Gurpreet Singh’s release was ordered on strict conditions, including not leaving the country without court permission, appearing for hearings, and abstaining from criminal activity.

Date of Decision:  05.02.2024

GURPREET SINGH VS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

 

Latest Legal News