Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

NDPS - Non-Compliance of Sampling Procedure Entitles Applicant to Bail: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court today granted bail to Gurpreet Singh, who had been in custody since June 8, 2021, in connection with a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). Justice Navin Chawla, presiding over the case, underscored key procedural lapses and excessive delay in the trial as grounds for the decision.

Gurpreet Singh was apprehended with 26.790 kgs of Cannabis, leading to charges under Sections 20/61/85 of the NDPS Act. His bail application highlighted the violation of prescribed sampling procedures and the prolonged duration of the trial, which has only seen partial examination of two out of 22 witnesses in over three years.

In his judgment, Justice Chawla observed, “In the present case, therefore, as there is a non-compliance with the procedure prescribed for sampling, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.” This observation reflects the court’s acknowledgment of procedural flaws in the handling of the seized Cannabis.

The court also considered the undue delay In the trial process. “Only two out of 22 witnesses have been examined in the trial, that that too only partially; coupled with the other factors as have been discussed in this judgment, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on account of the delay in trial and there being no likelihood of it being concluded in the near future,” Justice Chawla added.

The prosecution's argument that stringent bail criteria set by Section 37 of the NDPS Act for offences involving commercial quantities should be upheld was considered but ultimately did not sway the court’s decision.

Gurpreet Singh’s release was ordered on strict conditions, including not leaving the country without court permission, appearing for hearings, and abstaining from criminal activity.

Date of Decision:  05.02.2024

GURPREET SINGH VS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

 

Latest Legal News