138 NI Act | Admission Of Signatures On Cheque Triggers Statutory Presumption Of Debt: Punjab & Haryana HC Magistrate Cannot Straightaway Issue NBW For Non-Appearance If Accused Is Already On Bail; Bail Valid Until Cancelled: Orissa High Court Bank Cannot Dishonour Cheques Merely Because Account Title Changed From Partnership To Proprietorship: Madhya Pradesh High Court Environmental Clearance Is Site-Specific; Violations At Different Site By Related Entity Not Ground To Deny New EC: Kerala High Court Advocate’s Failure To Formally Prove Fee Bill Not Fatal To Claim If Oral Evidence Establishes Non-Payment Of Agreed Professional Fees: Delhi High Court Police Officers Cannot Fight Over Specific Postings; Disciplined Force Must Prioritize Public Interest Over Location: Karnataka High Court RERA Section 18 Interest For Delayed Possession Is An Unqualified Absolute Right; Notice Under Section 55 Contract Act Not Required: Bombay High Court State Cannot Hand Over Additional Charge Of Sensitive Posts To Tainted Officers Facing Disciplinary Action: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mandatory Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Essential If Accused Resides Outside Jurisdiction; Commercial Breach Not Criminal Offence: Calcutta High Court Disciplinary Enquiry Cannot Be Quashed Merely For Delay In Conclusion; 6-Month Timeline Under G.O.Ms.No.679 Is Directory: Andhra Pradesh High Court Exoneration In Adjudication Proceedings No Bar To Criminal Prosecution If CBI Collects Independent Evidence Of Forgery & Conspiracy: Bombay High Court Public Prosecutor Not A 'Post Office' Of Investigating Agency; Independent Application Of Mind Mandatory For Extending Remand Beyond 180 Days Under NDPS Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Complainant Cannot Use Section 311 CrPC To Reopen Pre-Charge Stage After Explicit Waiver & Framing Of Charges: Allahabad High Court Bomb Blast In Train Is An 'Accident' Under Railways Act, Union Of India Liable To Pay Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Bail Hearing Can Proceed In Informant's Absence If Notice Was Served Despite Section 483(2) BNSS Mandate: Allahabad High Court

Ministry of Law and Justice Constitutes High-Level Committee to Explore Simultaneous Elections

04 September 2024 11:26 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 2, 2023 – In a landmark resolution, the Ministry of Law and Justice has constituted a High-Level Committee (HLC) to examine the feasibility and modalities of holding simultaneous elections in India. The committee is tasked with delivering its recommendations at the earliest.

The HLC is chaired by Shri Ram Nath Kovind, the Former President of India. The committee includes high-ranking officials and experts such as Shri Amit Shah, Minister of Home Affairs, Shri Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, Leader of the Largest Party in Opposition in the Lok Sabha, and Shri Sanjay Kothari, Former Chief Vigilance Commissioner.

The primary objective is to analyze the existing constitutional and legislative frameworks and recommend specific amendments that may be needed to facilitate simultaneous elections to the Lok Sabha, State Legislative Assemblies, Municipalities, and Panchayats.

The HLC is also mandated to assess logistical and resource-based challenges, including the need for Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and Voter-Verified Paper Audit Trails (VVPATs).

The committee will explore whether constitutional amendments would require ratification by the states and also aims to propose a single electoral roll and identity cards for voters across different types of elections.

The functioning of the HLC will be financed through a separate budget allocation provided by the Ministry of Law and Justice.

The move aims to reduce the financial burden and logistical challenges posed by the current system of frequent elections, aligning with recommendations from the Law Commission of India and Parliamentary Standing Committees.

Latest Legal News