Limitation For Executing Partition Decree Not Suspended Till Engrossment; Right To Seek Engrossment Subsists During 12-Year Execution Period: Allahabad HC Unilateral Revocation Of Registered Gift Deed Through Sub-Registrar Is Void, Donor Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mediation Cannot Be Forced Upon Unwilling Party In Civil Suits; Consent Of Both Sides Essential: Bombay High Court Unmarried Daughter Not Entitled To Freedom Fighter Pension If Gainfully Employed At Time Of Father's Death: Calcutta High Court Section 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Denied For Lack Of Formal Divorce From First Marriage: Delhi High Court ONGC Cannot Demand Security From Award Holder After Giving ‘No Objection’ To Withdrawal Of Deposited Amount: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sedative Drugs Like Tramadol Impact Mental Fitness Of Declarant; Bombay High Court Acquits Man Relying On Doubtful Dying Declarations Postal Tracking Report Showing 'Refusal' Not Conclusive Proof Of Service If Denied On Oath: Delhi High Court Encroachments Near Military Installations Pose National Security Threat; Remove Illegal Constructions Within Three Months: Rajasthan High Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs State To Decide On Legality Of Charging Fees For Downloading FIRs From 'SAANJH' Portal Wife’s Educational Qualifications No Bar To Seeking Maintenance If Actual Employment Is Not Proven: Orissa High Court Mere Telephonic Contact Without Substance Of Conversation Cannot Establish Criminal Conspiracy: Madhya Pradesh High Court Serious Allegations Like HIV/AIDS Imputations Require Corroboration, Cannot Rest Solely On Unsubstantiated Testimony: Karnataka High Court Family Court Cannot Refuse Mutual Consent Divorce Merely Because Parties Are Living Separately 'Without Valid Reason': Kerala High Court Collective Attempts By Advocates To Overbear Presiding Officer Not Protected Professional Conduct: Madras High Court Dismisses Quash Petitions No Legal Evidence Required To Forward A Person To Trial? Rajasthan HC Slams Police For Implicating Accused In NDPS Case Solely On Co-Accused's Statement Accused Must Be Physically Present In Court To Furnish Bonds Under Section 91 BNSS: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Maintenance to be Recalculated at 25% of Husband’s Income for Wife, 20% for Each Child: Allahabad High Court Modifies Family Court’s Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Allahabad High Court today revised the interim maintenance amounts previously ordered by the Family Court in Muzaffarnagar. The court declared that the maintenance “be recalculated at 25% of the husband’s income for the wife and 20% for each child,” ensuring the amounts reflect the respondent’s true financial capability.

The decision comes after Smt. Shaily Mittal and her two children filed a criminal revision petition against the interim maintenance awarded by the Family Court under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The petitioners sought an enhancement citing that the initial maintenance calculation did not fully account for the husband’s undisclosed earnings from his business and investments.

Initially, the Family Court awarded Rs. 7,000 to the wife and Rs. 2,000 to each child. The revisionists challenged these figures, providing evidence of the husband’s additional income sources including substantial investments in NSCs, PPF, and FDRs, which were previously overlooked.

Justice Surendra Singh-I reviewed the submissions and evidence, focusing on:

Undisclosed Income: The husband’s monthly income was reassessed at Rs. 60,000 based on business involvement and investments.

Maintenance Recalculation: Aligning with legal precedents, the court set new maintenance amounts to 25% of the husband’s income for the wife and 20% for each child, amounting to Rs. 15,000 and Rs. 6,000 respectively.

Legal Framework: Citing cases such as Shailja vs. Khobbanna and Kalyan Dey Chowdhury vs. Rita Dey Chowdhury Nee Nandy, the judgment emphasized the court’s duty to ensure maintenance reflects the payer’s financial reality.

The Allahabad High Court amended the previous order to provide fairer maintenance support based on the comprehensive assessment of the husband’s finances. The revised maintenance is backdated to the original application date, with arrears to be settled in four installments.

 Date of Decision: 10th April 2024

 Smt. Shaily Mittal And 2 Others  VS Opposite Party: State Of U.P And Another

Latest Legal News