Detailed Description Of Concealment Not Mandatory Under Section 27 Evidence Act: Bombay High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Child Is Not A Pawn To Prove Mother's Adultery: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Husband's DNA Test Petition In Desertion Divorce Case Shareholder Ratification Cannot Cure Fraud Under SEBI's PFUTP Regulations: Supreme Court Restores Rs. 70 Lakh Penalty on Company When High Court Judges Themselves Disagree on the Answer, Can a Law Graduate Be Penalised for Getting It Wrong? Supreme Court Says No Superficial Burns Don't Mean Silence: Supreme Court Explains Why 80-90% Burn Victim Could Still Make a Valid Dying Declaration Daughter's Eyewitness Account, Dying Declaration Seal Husband's Fate: Supreme Court Upholds Life Sentence for Wife-Burning Murder Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 106 Crore Compensation Claim; Directs SECL to Supply Coal to Prakash Industries at 2014 or 2019 Prices for Wrongfully Suspended Period Section 319 CrPC | Trial Court Cannot Conduct Mini Trial While Deciding Application to Summon Additional Accused: Supreme Court Accused Can't Be Left Without Documents To Defend: Calcutta High Court Directs Adjudicating Authority To First Decide Whether Complete 'Relied Upon Documents' Were Served In PMLA Proceedings Husband Who Took Voluntary Retirement at 47 Cannot Escape Maintenance Duty: Delhi High Court Upholds ₹10,000/Month to Wife and Daughter Cannot Claim Monopoly Over a Deity's Name: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Trademark Injunction Against 'Kshetrapal Construction' Eviction Appeal Cannot Require Actual Surrender Of Possession, Symbolic Possession Sufficient: J&K High Court Amendment Introducing Time-Barred Relief And Changing Nature Of Suit Cannot Be Allowed: Karnataka High Court Counter Claim Is An Independent Suit: MP High Court Rules Properties Beyond Territorial Jurisdiction Cannot Be Dragged Into Counter Claim Co-Sharer Cannot Be Bound By Passage Carved Out Without His Consent: Punjab & Haryana High Court Modifies Concurrent Decrees ‘Prima Facie True’ Is Enough to Deny Liberty: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses Bail in Babbar Khalsa Terror Conspiracy Case High Court Cannot Quash FIR for Forgery When Handwriting Expert's Report Is Still Awaited: Supreme Court Supreme Court Calls for Paternity Leave Law, Says Father's Absence in Child's Early Years Leaves a "Quiet Cost" That Lasts a Lifetime Three-Month Age Cap for Adoptive Mothers' Maternity Benefit Struck Down: Supreme Court Reads Down Section 60(4) of Social Security Code Bank Cannot Rely on Charter Party Agreement to Justify Remittance Contrary to Customer's Instructions: Supreme Court 19 Candidates Linked to Accused, Papers of Five Subjects Leaked: Allahabad High Court Upholds Cancellation of UP Assistant Professor Exam Result

Maintenance to be Recalculated at 25% of Husband’s Income for Wife, 20% for Each Child: Allahabad High Court Modifies Family Court’s Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Allahabad High Court today revised the interim maintenance amounts previously ordered by the Family Court in Muzaffarnagar. The court declared that the maintenance “be recalculated at 25% of the husband’s income for the wife and 20% for each child,” ensuring the amounts reflect the respondent’s true financial capability.

The decision comes after Smt. Shaily Mittal and her two children filed a criminal revision petition against the interim maintenance awarded by the Family Court under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The petitioners sought an enhancement citing that the initial maintenance calculation did not fully account for the husband’s undisclosed earnings from his business and investments.

Initially, the Family Court awarded Rs. 7,000 to the wife and Rs. 2,000 to each child. The revisionists challenged these figures, providing evidence of the husband’s additional income sources including substantial investments in NSCs, PPF, and FDRs, which were previously overlooked.

Justice Surendra Singh-I reviewed the submissions and evidence, focusing on:

Undisclosed Income: The husband’s monthly income was reassessed at Rs. 60,000 based on business involvement and investments.

Maintenance Recalculation: Aligning with legal precedents, the court set new maintenance amounts to 25% of the husband’s income for the wife and 20% for each child, amounting to Rs. 15,000 and Rs. 6,000 respectively.

Legal Framework: Citing cases such as Shailja vs. Khobbanna and Kalyan Dey Chowdhury vs. Rita Dey Chowdhury Nee Nandy, the judgment emphasized the court’s duty to ensure maintenance reflects the payer’s financial reality.

The Allahabad High Court amended the previous order to provide fairer maintenance support based on the comprehensive assessment of the husband’s finances. The revised maintenance is backdated to the original application date, with arrears to be settled in four installments.

 Date of Decision: 10th April 2024

 Smt. Shaily Mittal And 2 Others  VS Opposite Party: State Of U.P And Another

Latest Legal News