UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Madras High Court Sets Aside Passport Denial, Directs Accused to Seek Court Permission for Travel Abroad

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Madras High Court, in a significant ruling, addressed the nexus between pending criminal proceedings and the eligibility for passport issuance. The Court's decision revolved around the interpretation and application of Sections 5(2) and 6(2) of the Passports Act, 1967, and the Ministry of External Affairs notification GSR.570(E) dated 25.08.1993.

The petitioner, Rajkumar, challenged the refusal to issue a passport due to a pending criminal case (Cr.No.44 of 2022). The Regional Passport Officer had issued a show cause notice, citing the suppression of information about the pending case in the passport application. The primary issue was whether a passport could be issued to a person with ongoing criminal proceedings.

Justice V.Bhavani Subbaroyan, while assessing the matter, referred to the precedents in N.Chandrababu vs. the Sub Inspector of Police and Noushad Thazhaith vs. State, which established guidelines for passport issuance to individuals with pending criminal cases. The Court observed, "In the light of these legal provisions...it is incumbent upon the petitioner to obtain permission from the court where the criminal case is pending for traveling abroad." The Court further added that "a balance must be struck between the individual’s right to travel and the interests of justice."

The judgment underscored the application of Sections 5(2) and 6(2) of the Passports Act, 1967. These sections empower the passport authority to refuse passport issuance in cases where criminal proceedings are pending. Additionally, the Court highlighted the MEA notification GSR.570(E), which provides a mechanism for individuals with pending cases to obtain passports, subject to certain conditions.

The High Court set aside the order of the Regional Passport Officer dated 05.01.2024 and directed the petitioner to seek permission from the court handling his criminal case for traveling abroad and passport issuance. The petitioner was also instructed to participate in the criminal proceedings and inform the court about the High Court's orders.

Dated : 01.02.2024

Rajkumar vs. The Regional Passport Officer & Anr.

 

 

Latest Legal News