Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal GST Officer Froze Business Accounts Without Any Legal Basis, Ignored Taxpayer for Three Months: Bombay High Court Imposes Personal Costs Weapon Recovered, But No Forensic Report, No Independent Witness — Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused

Madras High Court Sets Aside Passport Denial, Directs Accused to Seek Court Permission for Travel Abroad

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin

The Madras High Court, in a significant ruling, addressed the nexus between pending criminal proceedings and the eligibility for passport issuance. The Court's decision revolved around the interpretation and application of Sections 5(2) and 6(2) of the Passports Act, 1967, and the Ministry of External Affairs notification GSR.570(E) dated 25.08.1993.

The petitioner, Rajkumar, challenged the refusal to issue a passport due to a pending criminal case (Cr.No.44 of 2022). The Regional Passport Officer had issued a show cause notice, citing the suppression of information about the pending case in the passport application. The primary issue was whether a passport could be issued to a person with ongoing criminal proceedings.

Justice V.Bhavani Subbaroyan, while assessing the matter, referred to the precedents in N.Chandrababu vs. the Sub Inspector of Police and Noushad Thazhaith vs. State, which established guidelines for passport issuance to individuals with pending criminal cases. The Court observed, "In the light of these legal provisions...it is incumbent upon the petitioner to obtain permission from the court where the criminal case is pending for traveling abroad." The Court further added that "a balance must be struck between the individual’s right to travel and the interests of justice."

The judgment underscored the application of Sections 5(2) and 6(2) of the Passports Act, 1967. These sections empower the passport authority to refuse passport issuance in cases where criminal proceedings are pending. Additionally, the Court highlighted the MEA notification GSR.570(E), which provides a mechanism for individuals with pending cases to obtain passports, subject to certain conditions.

The High Court set aside the order of the Regional Passport Officer dated 05.01.2024 and directed the petitioner to seek permission from the court handling his criminal case for traveling abroad and passport issuance. The petitioner was also instructed to participate in the criminal proceedings and inform the court about the High Court's orders.

Dated : 01.02.2024

Rajkumar vs. The Regional Passport Officer & Anr.

 

 

Latest Legal News

  • by sayum
    15 April 2026 9:28 AM
Weapon Recovered, But No Forensic Report, No Independent Witness — Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused
  • by sayum
    15 April 2026 9:26 AM
GST Officer Froze Business Accounts Without Any Legal Basis, Ignored Taxpayer for Three Months: Bombay High Court Imposes Personal Costs
  • by sayum
    15 April 2026 9:19 AM
Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court
  • by sayum
    15 April 2026 9:18 AM
Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court
  • by sayum
    15 April 2026 9:18 AM
Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker
  • by sayum
    15 April 2026 7:31 AM
Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court