Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Liberty Must Override Statutory Embargo: High Court Grants Bail NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Shiv Om, arrested under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, emphasizing the "prolonged incarceration" of the accused. Justice Pankaj Jain, presiding over the bench, underscored the importance of liberty in cases of extended custody, referring to apex court precedents.

The court's decision primarily revolved around the consideration of prolonged custody as a factor for granting bail. Despite the seriousness of charges under the NDPS Act, the court weighed the rights of the individual against the duration of custody.

Shiv Om was apprehended for allegedly transporting a substantial quantity of opium. The recovery involved 500 grams from a car, leading to the subsequent discovery of 2 kg & 600 grams of opium from Shiv Om's truck. This arrest and subsequent bail petition raised questions about the balance between NDPS Act provisions and the rights of individuals in prolonged custody without trial completion.

Justice Jain, in his assessment, highlighted the period of incarceration exceeding two years and three months. The judge cited several apex court judgments underscoring the essence of liberty and the right to a speedy trial. The court, while not delving into the merits of the case, acknowledged the necessity of bail in the context of delayed legal proceedings.

Justice Jain observed, "Prolonged incarceration generally militates against the most precious fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution." He further added, "In such a situation, the conditional liberty must override the statutory embargo created under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act."

The judgment was rooted in the legal principles enshrined in the Constitution, particularly the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21. It also involved interpreting the NDPS Act, especially the conditions under Section 37 related to bail in drug-related offenses.

The High Court granted bail to Shiv Om, subject to several conditions like not misusing liberty, not tampering with evidence, maintaining presence at trial, and depositing his passport.

Date of decision: 01.02.2024

Shiv Om  VS State of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News