Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Liberty Must Override Statutory Embargo: High Court Grants Bail NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Shiv Om, arrested under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, emphasizing the "prolonged incarceration" of the accused. Justice Pankaj Jain, presiding over the bench, underscored the importance of liberty in cases of extended custody, referring to apex court precedents.

The court's decision primarily revolved around the consideration of prolonged custody as a factor for granting bail. Despite the seriousness of charges under the NDPS Act, the court weighed the rights of the individual against the duration of custody.

Shiv Om was apprehended for allegedly transporting a substantial quantity of opium. The recovery involved 500 grams from a car, leading to the subsequent discovery of 2 kg & 600 grams of opium from Shiv Om's truck. This arrest and subsequent bail petition raised questions about the balance between NDPS Act provisions and the rights of individuals in prolonged custody without trial completion.

Justice Jain, in his assessment, highlighted the period of incarceration exceeding two years and three months. The judge cited several apex court judgments underscoring the essence of liberty and the right to a speedy trial. The court, while not delving into the merits of the case, acknowledged the necessity of bail in the context of delayed legal proceedings.

Justice Jain observed, "Prolonged incarceration generally militates against the most precious fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution." He further added, "In such a situation, the conditional liberty must override the statutory embargo created under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act."

The judgment was rooted in the legal principles enshrined in the Constitution, particularly the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21. It also involved interpreting the NDPS Act, especially the conditions under Section 37 related to bail in drug-related offenses.

The High Court granted bail to Shiv Om, subject to several conditions like not misusing liberty, not tampering with evidence, maintaining presence at trial, and depositing his passport.

Date of decision: 01.02.2024

Shiv Om  VS State of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News