Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Liberty Must Override Statutory Embargo: High Court Grants Bail NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Shiv Om, arrested under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, emphasizing the "prolonged incarceration" of the accused. Justice Pankaj Jain, presiding over the bench, underscored the importance of liberty in cases of extended custody, referring to apex court precedents.

The court's decision primarily revolved around the consideration of prolonged custody as a factor for granting bail. Despite the seriousness of charges under the NDPS Act, the court weighed the rights of the individual against the duration of custody.

Shiv Om was apprehended for allegedly transporting a substantial quantity of opium. The recovery involved 500 grams from a car, leading to the subsequent discovery of 2 kg & 600 grams of opium from Shiv Om's truck. This arrest and subsequent bail petition raised questions about the balance between NDPS Act provisions and the rights of individuals in prolonged custody without trial completion.

Justice Jain, in his assessment, highlighted the period of incarceration exceeding two years and three months. The judge cited several apex court judgments underscoring the essence of liberty and the right to a speedy trial. The court, while not delving into the merits of the case, acknowledged the necessity of bail in the context of delayed legal proceedings.

Justice Jain observed, "Prolonged incarceration generally militates against the most precious fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution." He further added, "In such a situation, the conditional liberty must override the statutory embargo created under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act."

The judgment was rooted in the legal principles enshrined in the Constitution, particularly the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21. It also involved interpreting the NDPS Act, especially the conditions under Section 37 related to bail in drug-related offenses.

The High Court granted bail to Shiv Om, subject to several conditions like not misusing liberty, not tampering with evidence, maintaining presence at trial, and depositing his passport.

Date of decision: 01.02.2024

Shiv Om  VS State of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News