Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal GST Officer Froze Business Accounts Without Any Legal Basis, Ignored Taxpayer for Three Months: Bombay High Court Imposes Personal Costs Weapon Recovered, But No Forensic Report, No Independent Witness — Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused

Liberty Must Override Statutory Embargo: High Court Grants Bail NDPS Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Shiv Om, arrested under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, emphasizing the "prolonged incarceration" of the accused. Justice Pankaj Jain, presiding over the bench, underscored the importance of liberty in cases of extended custody, referring to apex court precedents.

The court's decision primarily revolved around the consideration of prolonged custody as a factor for granting bail. Despite the seriousness of charges under the NDPS Act, the court weighed the rights of the individual against the duration of custody.

Shiv Om was apprehended for allegedly transporting a substantial quantity of opium. The recovery involved 500 grams from a car, leading to the subsequent discovery of 2 kg & 600 grams of opium from Shiv Om's truck. This arrest and subsequent bail petition raised questions about the balance between NDPS Act provisions and the rights of individuals in prolonged custody without trial completion.

Justice Jain, in his assessment, highlighted the period of incarceration exceeding two years and three months. The judge cited several apex court judgments underscoring the essence of liberty and the right to a speedy trial. The court, while not delving into the merits of the case, acknowledged the necessity of bail in the context of delayed legal proceedings.

Justice Jain observed, "Prolonged incarceration generally militates against the most precious fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution." He further added, "In such a situation, the conditional liberty must override the statutory embargo created under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act."

The judgment was rooted in the legal principles enshrined in the Constitution, particularly the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21. It also involved interpreting the NDPS Act, especially the conditions under Section 37 related to bail in drug-related offenses.

The High Court granted bail to Shiv Om, subject to several conditions like not misusing liberty, not tampering with evidence, maintaining presence at trial, and depositing his passport.

Date of decision: 01.02.2024

Shiv Om  VS State of Punjab

 

Latest Legal News