Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court

Law Aides the Abiding, Not Its Resistant – Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Anticipatory Bail to Accused Declared Absconders

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court today dismissed the appeal (Criminal Appeal No. Of 2024 @ SLP(Crl.) No. 7940 of 2023) filed by Srikant Upadhyay & Ors. Against the State of Bihar & Anr., reaffirming the denial of anticipatory bail to individuals declared absconders and emphasizing the importance of respecting court orders.

Legal Point: The apex court’s decision focused on the denial of anticipatory bail to individuals against whom non-bailable warrants are issued and proceedings under Sections 82/83, Cr.PC are initiated. The bench of Justices C.T. Ravikumar and Sanjay Kumar upheld that the appellants’ failure to respect lawful court orders and their consistent attempts to evade arrest disentitle them from seeking anticipatory bail.

Case Facts: The appellants filed for anticipatory bail related to FIR No.79 of 2020, involving charges under IPC and the Daain Act. The High Court had earlier dismissed their application. The Supreme Court was confronted with the issue of whether a pending anticipatory bail application can be considered on its merits despite the issuance of a proclamation under Section 82, Cr.PC.

Court Assessment: The court meticulously analyzed the legal framework and precedents surrounding anticipatory bail, particularly for absconding accused. Justice C.T. Ravikumar, in his judgment, underscored, “An accused is deemed absconding if they are hiding or concealing themselves to avoid arrest.” The court noted that filing an anticipatory bail application does not constitute an appearance before the court for proceedings under Section 82/83, Cr.PC, stressing the necessity of physical appearance.

Furthermore, the judgment clarified that the pendency of an anticipatory bail application without interim protection does not hinder the trial court from issuing a proclamation under Section 82, Cr.PC or taking steps under Section 83, Cr.PC.

Decision: The Supreme Court concluded that the appellants’ consistent defiance of court orders and evasion of the arrest process rendered them undeserving of the relief of anticipatory bail. Thus, the appeal was dismissed, reaffirming the High Court’s decision.

Date of Decision: March 14, 2024

Srikant Upadhyay & Ors. Versus State of Bihar & Anr.

Similar News