Arbitrator Cannot Rewrite Contract Or Travel Beyond Pleadings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes ₹5.18 Crore Award Director’ in GeM Clause 29 Does Not Mean ‘Independent Director’: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Technical Disqualification Section 25(3) Is Sacrosanct – Removal of a Trademark Cannot Rest on a Defective Notice: Delhi High Court Not Every Broken Promise Is Rape: Delhi High Court Draws Clear Line Between ‘Suspicion’ and ‘Grave Suspicion’ in False Promise to Marry Case Section 37 Is Not A Second Appeal On Merits: Delhi High Court Refuses To Re-Appreciate Evidence In Challenge To Arbitral Award Recovery After Retirement Is Clearly Impermissible: Bombay High Court Shields Retired Teacher From ₹2.80 Lakh Salary Recovery Successive FIRs Cannot Be Used to Thwart Bail: Supreme Court Invokes Article 32 to Protect Personal Liberty Supreme Court Enforces Contractual Bar Against Interest in Government Contracts Ex Parte Decree Not a Blank Cheque - Merely Because Defendant Absent, Plaintiff’s Case Not Presumed True: Madras High Court Mandatory Injunction Cannot Be Kept in Cold Storage: Supreme Court Enforces Strict Three-Year Limitation for Execution Senior Citizens Act Is for Maintenance, Not a Shortcut to Eviction: Calcutta High Court Restrains Tribunal’s Overreach Statement ‘Counsel Says’ Is Not a Binding Undertaking Without Client’s Specific Authorization: Allahabad High Court Declines to Initiate Contempt Rigours of Section 43-D(5) Melt Down When Liberty Is at Stake: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail in UAPA Case After 2.5 Years’ Custody Vakalatnama Is Not a Mere Form – Attestation Is a Legal Safeguard: Andhra Pradesh High Court Cautions Advocates and Registry on Procedural Sanctity Right to Be Considered for Promotion Is Fundamental – Employer’s Unfairness Cannot Defeat It: : Gujarat High Court Panchayat Statement Implicating Others Is Not a Confession Proper: J&K High Court Rejects Extra-Judicial Confession in Murder Appeal Contempt Lies Only on ‘Wilful and Deliberate Disobedience’ – Fresh KASP Appointments Not Replacement of Daily Wage Workers: Kerala High Court 498A Cannot Become a Dragnet for Entire Family: Orissa High Court Shields Distant In-Laws but Sends Husband to Trial

"Landmark Judgment Grants Anticipatory Bail to First-Time Offender in High-Profile Corruption Case"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, under the stewardship of HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA, delivered a groundbreaking judgment on 17th October 2023, granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Darvesh Gopal, who was accused in a high-profile case involving multiple charges under the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The judgment has garnered attention for its progressive approach to bail principles and its emphasis on safeguarding personal liberty, especially in cases involving first-time offenders.

Justice Chitkara's observations in the judgment have been hailed as a beacon of hope for those seeking bail in non-bailable offenses. He stated, "Given the penal provisions imposed and the sentence provided by the Legislature, the nature of allegations coupled with the fact that the petitioner is a first offender...needs consideration for bail." This quote underscores the court's recognition of the need to provide individuals with an opportunity for reform, even in cases with serious charges.

The judgment also highlights the importance of balancing individual rights with the need for police investigations. Justice Chitkara noted, "The courts while imposing bail conditions must balance the liberty of the accused and the necessity of a fair trial." This statement underscores the court's commitment to ensuring that bail conditions are not overly restrictive and do not infringe on an individual's fundamental rights.

Furthermore, the judgment sets specific conditions for bail, such as a personal bond, surety, and a fixed deposit, while also addressing concerns related to mobile phone usage during bail. It emphasizes that these conditions are aimed at preventing the accused from repeating the offense and providing remedies for the victim.

Justice Chitkara's observations regarding bail conditions have been widely praised for their fairness and proportionality. He remarked, "The bail conditions imposed by the Court must not only have a nexus to the purpose that they seek to serve but must also be proportional to the purpose of imposing them." This statement reflects the court's commitment to ensuring that bail conditions are reasonable and do not result in the deprivation of an individual's rights and liberties.

The judgment also allows for the modification of bail conditions if they are found to violate rights or cause difficulties. This provision ensures that individuals have recourse if they face challenges in complying with the conditions set by the court.

Overall, this landmark judgment in the case of Darvesh Gopal has not only provided relief to the petitioner but has also set a precedent for a more balanced and compassionate approach to bail in the Indian legal system. It reaffirms the principle that personal liberty should be upheld while ensuring the fairness of legal proceedings.

Representing the petitioner, Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate, expressed his satisfaction with the judgment, stating that it sets a positive precedent for future cases involving anticipatory bail. The State was represented by Ms. Shubhra Singh, Addl. A.G. Haryana.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the judiciary's crucial role in upholding the rights and liberties of individuals while maintaining the integrity of the legal process.

Date of Decision: 17.10.2023

Darvesh Gopal VS State of Haryana   

Latest Legal News