Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

LAND REFORMS ACT CEASES TO APPLY AFTER URBANIZATION NOTIFICATION: UNDER DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that once a notification is issued declaring rural areas to be urbanized, the provisions of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 cease to apply. The judgment resolves a long-standing land dispute and provides clarity on the effect of urbanization on the application of relevant acts.

Quoting from the judgment, the bench comprising Justices Ajay Rastogi, C.T. Ravikumar, and Bela M. Trivedi stated, "Once a notification has been published under Section 507(a) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, the provisions of the Act, 1954 cease to apply. In sequel thereto, the proceedings pending under the Act, 1954 become non est and lose their legal significance."

The case involved a dispute over possession of land, and the judgment brings relief to the respondents who had been struggling for over three decades to assert their ownership rights. The Court invoked Article 142 of the Constitution to ensure justice, ordering the appellants to hand over physical possession of the land within two months.

Highlighting the significance of the Delhi Development Act, 1957, the Court emphasized that it does not distinguish between rural and urban areas. The Act, which aims at the development of Delhi according to sanctioned master plans, was considered a complete code in itself for land disposal purposes.

The judgment also addressed the relevance of previous decisions, including the case of Smt. Indu Khorana, which upheld the view that the Act, 1954 does not apply once an urbanization notification is issued. The Court, however, disagreed with the judgment in Umed Singh, which examined the impact of the Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1948 in relation to the Act, 1957.

With the dismissal of the appeal, the pending civil suit related to the land dispute stands disposed of. The Court's decision emphasizes the importance of ensuring timely resolution of land disputes and protecting the rights of rightful owners.

Date of Decision: March 14, 2023

MOHINDER SINGH(DEAD) THROUGH LRS VS NARAIN SINGH AND OTHERS     

Latest Legal News