MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

LAND REFORMS ACT CEASES TO APPLY AFTER URBANIZATION NOTIFICATION: UNDER DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that once a notification is issued declaring rural areas to be urbanized, the provisions of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 cease to apply. The judgment resolves a long-standing land dispute and provides clarity on the effect of urbanization on the application of relevant acts.

Quoting from the judgment, the bench comprising Justices Ajay Rastogi, C.T. Ravikumar, and Bela M. Trivedi stated, "Once a notification has been published under Section 507(a) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, the provisions of the Act, 1954 cease to apply. In sequel thereto, the proceedings pending under the Act, 1954 become non est and lose their legal significance."

The case involved a dispute over possession of land, and the judgment brings relief to the respondents who had been struggling for over three decades to assert their ownership rights. The Court invoked Article 142 of the Constitution to ensure justice, ordering the appellants to hand over physical possession of the land within two months.

Highlighting the significance of the Delhi Development Act, 1957, the Court emphasized that it does not distinguish between rural and urban areas. The Act, which aims at the development of Delhi according to sanctioned master plans, was considered a complete code in itself for land disposal purposes.

The judgment also addressed the relevance of previous decisions, including the case of Smt. Indu Khorana, which upheld the view that the Act, 1954 does not apply once an urbanization notification is issued. The Court, however, disagreed with the judgment in Umed Singh, which examined the impact of the Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1948 in relation to the Act, 1957.

With the dismissal of the appeal, the pending civil suit related to the land dispute stands disposed of. The Court's decision emphasizes the importance of ensuring timely resolution of land disputes and protecting the rights of rightful owners.

Date of Decision: March 14, 2023

MOHINDER SINGH(DEAD) THROUGH LRS VS NARAIN SINGH AND OTHERS     

Latest Legal News