Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Litigants Have No Right to Choose the Bench: Bombay High Court Rules Rule 3A Is Mandatory, Sends Writ to Kolhapur Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Grandfather in Rape Case, Citing Unnatural Conduct and Infirm Evidence Cheating and Forgery Taint Even Legal Funds: No Safe Haven in Law for Laundered Money: Bombay High Court Final Maintenance Is Not Bound by Interim Orders – Section 125 Determination Must Be Based on Real Evidence: Delhi High Court Contempt | Power to Punish Carries Within It the Power to Forgive: Supreme Court Sets Aside Jail Term for Director Who Criticised Judges Over Stray Dog Orders Seizure and Attachment Are Not Twins: Supreme Court Holds Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts in PC Act Cases Using CrPC Section 102 IBC | Pre-Existing Dispute Must Be Real, Not Moonshine: Supreme Court Restores Insolvency Proceedings, Says Admission Cannot Be Rejected Based on Spurious Defence Summons Under FEMA Are Civil in Nature – Section 160 CrPC Has No Role to Play: Delhi High Court Denies Exemption to Woman Petitioner from Personal Appearance Before ED Clear Admission in Ledger Is Sufficient for Summary Judgment: Delhi High Court Decrees ₹16.77 Cr in Favour of MSME Supplier Mere Allegation Under SC/ST Act Doesn’t Bar Bail When No Public Abuse Is Made Out: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Caste Atrocity Case Consent Of Girl Aged Above 16 Is Legally Valid Under Pre-2013 Law: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Rape Conviction Insurer Entitled to Recover Compensation from Owner When Driver Has No Licence or Fake Licence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Applies ‘Pay and Recover’ Doctrine Courts Cannot Rewrite Contracts Where Parties Have Failed to Clearly Define Property Terms: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Even Illegal Appointments Cannot Be Cancelled Without Hearing: Patna High Court Quashes Mass Termination Of Absorbed University Staff Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’

LAND REFORMS ACT CEASES TO APPLY AFTER URBANIZATION NOTIFICATION: UNDER DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that once a notification is issued declaring rural areas to be urbanized, the provisions of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 cease to apply. The judgment resolves a long-standing land dispute and provides clarity on the effect of urbanization on the application of relevant acts.

Quoting from the judgment, the bench comprising Justices Ajay Rastogi, C.T. Ravikumar, and Bela M. Trivedi stated, "Once a notification has been published under Section 507(a) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, the provisions of the Act, 1954 cease to apply. In sequel thereto, the proceedings pending under the Act, 1954 become non est and lose their legal significance."

The case involved a dispute over possession of land, and the judgment brings relief to the respondents who had been struggling for over three decades to assert their ownership rights. The Court invoked Article 142 of the Constitution to ensure justice, ordering the appellants to hand over physical possession of the land within two months.

Highlighting the significance of the Delhi Development Act, 1957, the Court emphasized that it does not distinguish between rural and urban areas. The Act, which aims at the development of Delhi according to sanctioned master plans, was considered a complete code in itself for land disposal purposes.

The judgment also addressed the relevance of previous decisions, including the case of Smt. Indu Khorana, which upheld the view that the Act, 1954 does not apply once an urbanization notification is issued. The Court, however, disagreed with the judgment in Umed Singh, which examined the impact of the Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1948 in relation to the Act, 1957.

With the dismissal of the appeal, the pending civil suit related to the land dispute stands disposed of. The Court's decision emphasizes the importance of ensuring timely resolution of land disputes and protecting the rights of rightful owners.

Date of Decision: March 14, 2023

MOHINDER SINGH(DEAD) THROUGH LRS VS NARAIN SINGH AND OTHERS     

Latest Legal News