Detailed Description Of Concealment Not Mandatory Under Section 27 Evidence Act: Bombay High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Child Is Not A Pawn To Prove Mother's Adultery: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Husband's DNA Test Petition In Desertion Divorce Case Shareholder Ratification Cannot Cure Fraud Under SEBI's PFUTP Regulations: Supreme Court Restores Rs. 70 Lakh Penalty on Company When High Court Judges Themselves Disagree on the Answer, Can a Law Graduate Be Penalised for Getting It Wrong? Supreme Court Says No Superficial Burns Don't Mean Silence: Supreme Court Explains Why 80-90% Burn Victim Could Still Make a Valid Dying Declaration Daughter's Eyewitness Account, Dying Declaration Seal Husband's Fate: Supreme Court Upholds Life Sentence for Wife-Burning Murder Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 106 Crore Compensation Claim; Directs SECL to Supply Coal to Prakash Industries at 2014 or 2019 Prices for Wrongfully Suspended Period Section 319 CrPC | Trial Court Cannot Conduct Mini Trial While Deciding Application to Summon Additional Accused: Supreme Court Accused Can't Be Left Without Documents To Defend: Calcutta High Court Directs Adjudicating Authority To First Decide Whether Complete 'Relied Upon Documents' Were Served In PMLA Proceedings Husband Who Took Voluntary Retirement at 47 Cannot Escape Maintenance Duty: Delhi High Court Upholds ₹10,000/Month to Wife and Daughter Cannot Claim Monopoly Over a Deity's Name: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Trademark Injunction Against 'Kshetrapal Construction' Eviction Appeal Cannot Require Actual Surrender Of Possession, Symbolic Possession Sufficient: J&K High Court Amendment Introducing Time-Barred Relief And Changing Nature Of Suit Cannot Be Allowed: Karnataka High Court Counter Claim Is An Independent Suit: MP High Court Rules Properties Beyond Territorial Jurisdiction Cannot Be Dragged Into Counter Claim Co-Sharer Cannot Be Bound By Passage Carved Out Without His Consent: Punjab & Haryana High Court Modifies Concurrent Decrees ‘Prima Facie True’ Is Enough to Deny Liberty: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses Bail in Babbar Khalsa Terror Conspiracy Case High Court Cannot Quash FIR for Forgery When Handwriting Expert's Report Is Still Awaited: Supreme Court Supreme Court Calls for Paternity Leave Law, Says Father's Absence in Child's Early Years Leaves a "Quiet Cost" That Lasts a Lifetime Three-Month Age Cap for Adoptive Mothers' Maternity Benefit Struck Down: Supreme Court Reads Down Section 60(4) of Social Security Code Bank Cannot Rely on Charter Party Agreement to Justify Remittance Contrary to Customer's Instructions: Supreme Court 19 Candidates Linked to Accused, Papers of Five Subjects Leaked: Allahabad High Court Upholds Cancellation of UP Assistant Professor Exam Result

Lack of Paternity Does Not Conclusively Negate the Alleged Rapes on Various Occasions: Calcutta High Court Upholds Rejection of Discharge in Rape Charges

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Calcutta High Court has reiterated that a negative DNA paternity test does not conclusively prove the absence of rape, thereby upholding the decision to reject the discharge of the accused in a case involving charges under Sections 376(2)(i) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.

The petitioner, Rabi Das, sought discharge from a criminal case asserting that a DNA test had proven he was not the father of a child born to the alleged victim, contending his innocence and arguing false implication in the rape charge. The application for discharge was initially rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge on the grounds that paternity alone does not resolve the accusation of rape, which allegedly occurred on multiple occasions.

The High Court, led by the Hon’ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta, highlighted that while the DNA report was a significant piece of evidence, it was not conclusive in proving the absence of rape. The Court stressed the importance of considering all available evidence, which includes the testimony of the victim and medical reports, in the substantive trial phase.

Justice Gupta noted, “The allegation of rape on multiple occasions demands a thorough examination of evidence beyond the DNA report.” He further pointed out that the allegations, as detailed by the victim on various instances, required judicial scrutiny which could not be adequately addressed at the discharge stage.

The judgment emphasized the necessity of a full trial to assess all facets of the case, stating that “premature discharge on the basis of a singular scientific report would undermine the judicial process.”

Upholding the lower court’s decision, the High Court dismissed the revisional application, stating that the dismissal of the discharge request was justified and aligned with legal standards. The Court decreed that the case proceed to trial for a comprehensive evaluation of all evidence.

Conclusion: This judgment underscores the principle that while scientific evidence like DNA tests are pivotal, they must be corroborated by other forms of evidence in cases of serious allegations such as rape. The necessity for a full and fair trial to establish the truth beyond reasonable doubt remains paramount in the judicial process.

Date of Decision: 6th May 2024

Rabi Das @ Rabindra Nath Das vs. The State of West Bengal & Another

Latest Legal News