Executing Court Cannot Go Behind The Decree To Amend Material Discrepancies In Property Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 216 CrPC | No Vested Right For Accused To Seek Alteration Of Charge; Court’s Power Is Exclusive And Discretionary: Jharkhand High Court Violation Of Examination Instructions Regarding OMR Sheets Warrants Mandatory Cancellation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Spurious Pesticides Ruin Lives: Telangana High Court Upholds Detention Of 'Insecticide Offender' For Endangering Public Order No Double Jeopardy In Service Law: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Treating Suspension Period As 'Non-Duty' After Employee Pleaded Guilty Advocates Have No Right To Call For Boycott; Any Such Call Or Obstruction Of Court Work Amounts To Contempt Of Court: Telangana High Court Failure To Establish 'Soon Before Death' Cruelty Precludes Conviction Under Section 304B IPC: Patna High Court Repeated False Police Complaints And Reckless Allegations Against Spouse Constitute Mental Cruelty Entitling Husband To Divorce: Madras High Court State Cannot Deny Arrears Of Pension Merely On Grounds Of Delay Without Considering Medical Evidence: Kerala High Court Allegations Of Continuous Sexual Harassment And Intimidation Require Trial; Proceedings Cannot Be Quashed On Plea Of Previous Enmity: Karnataka High Court Section 138 NI Act | Complainant Must Prove Proprietorship Of Firm To Establish Locus Standi As 'Payee': Himachal Pradesh High Court Advocate-Client Privilege Does Not Grant Immunity From Investigation Into Personal Involvement In Alleged Offence: Delhi High Court Section 302 IPC | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained When Prosecution Fails To Identify Which Specific Accused Delivered Fatal Blow In Group Clash: Gujarat High Court Statutory Interest Under Section 28 Land Acquisition Act Cannot Be Denied For Delay In Filing Amendment Application: Delhi High Court Custodian Cannot Declare Property As 'Enemy Property' Based On Mere 'Ipse Dixit' Without Inquiry And Notice: Bombay High Court Arbitration Clause In Articles Of Association Operates As A Stand-Alone Contract Independent Of Section 430 Companies Act: Calcutta High Court Contumacious Disregard Of Court Orders By Advocates Must Be Addressed By Bar Council: Bombay High Court Refuses To Expunge Remarks Order 1 Rule 9 CPC | Non-Impleadment Of The State Renders Writ Petition Defective When Seeking Financial Relief Against Public Exchequer: Supreme Court

Lack of Paternity Does Not Conclusively Negate the Alleged Rapes on Various Occasions: Calcutta High Court Upholds Rejection of Discharge in Rape Charges

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Calcutta High Court has reiterated that a negative DNA paternity test does not conclusively prove the absence of rape, thereby upholding the decision to reject the discharge of the accused in a case involving charges under Sections 376(2)(i) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.

The petitioner, Rabi Das, sought discharge from a criminal case asserting that a DNA test had proven he was not the father of a child born to the alleged victim, contending his innocence and arguing false implication in the rape charge. The application for discharge was initially rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge on the grounds that paternity alone does not resolve the accusation of rape, which allegedly occurred on multiple occasions.

The High Court, led by the Hon’ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta, highlighted that while the DNA report was a significant piece of evidence, it was not conclusive in proving the absence of rape. The Court stressed the importance of considering all available evidence, which includes the testimony of the victim and medical reports, in the substantive trial phase.

Justice Gupta noted, “The allegation of rape on multiple occasions demands a thorough examination of evidence beyond the DNA report.” He further pointed out that the allegations, as detailed by the victim on various instances, required judicial scrutiny which could not be adequately addressed at the discharge stage.

The judgment emphasized the necessity of a full trial to assess all facets of the case, stating that “premature discharge on the basis of a singular scientific report would undermine the judicial process.”

Upholding the lower court’s decision, the High Court dismissed the revisional application, stating that the dismissal of the discharge request was justified and aligned with legal standards. The Court decreed that the case proceed to trial for a comprehensive evaluation of all evidence.

Conclusion: This judgment underscores the principle that while scientific evidence like DNA tests are pivotal, they must be corroborated by other forms of evidence in cases of serious allegations such as rape. The necessity for a full and fair trial to establish the truth beyond reasonable doubt remains paramount in the judicial process.

Date of Decision: 6th May 2024

Rabi Das @ Rabindra Nath Das vs. The State of West Bengal & Another

Latest Legal News