Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Key witness altered his Statement: High Court of Andhra Pradesh Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Against Municipal Officer

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh upheld the acquittal of Sri Doddi Narasimha Rao, a Tap Inspector with the Municipal Corporation of Guntur, in a bribery case. The case, filed under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, revolved around allegations of Rao demanding a bribe for installing a water tap connection.

In the detailed judgment, Hon’ble Justice A.V. Ravindra Babu observed, “The prosecution failed to establish foundational facts necessary to invoke presumption of guilt under Section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.” This observation was pivotal in determining the outcome of the case.

The appeal, filed by the State represented by the Inspector of Police, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Vijayawada Range, Guntur, challenged the initial acquittal verdict pronounced by the Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawada. The case hinged on the testimony of a key witness, identified as PW1, who significantly altered his narrative during the trial, turning hostile and impacting the credibility of the prosecution’s case.

Justice Ravindra Babu noted, “The evidence of PW1, who turned hostile, shattered the case of the prosecution to any extent.” He further remarked on the unreliability of the witness, stating, “It is quietly evident that P.W.1 was not a reliable witness and his evidence cannot be a basis to sustain any conviction especially when he turned hostile to the case of the prosecution.”

The judgment also highlighted that the recovery of tainted money from the accused officer did not conclusively link him to the alleged demand for a bribe. The Court’s decision emphasized the importance of concrete evidence and reliable witness testimony in corruption cases.

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

State, rep. By Inspector of Police VS Sri Doddi Narasimha Rao

Latest Legal News