CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Key witness altered his Statement: High Court of Andhra Pradesh Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Against Municipal Officer

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh upheld the acquittal of Sri Doddi Narasimha Rao, a Tap Inspector with the Municipal Corporation of Guntur, in a bribery case. The case, filed under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, revolved around allegations of Rao demanding a bribe for installing a water tap connection.

In the detailed judgment, Hon’ble Justice A.V. Ravindra Babu observed, “The prosecution failed to establish foundational facts necessary to invoke presumption of guilt under Section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.” This observation was pivotal in determining the outcome of the case.

The appeal, filed by the State represented by the Inspector of Police, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Vijayawada Range, Guntur, challenged the initial acquittal verdict pronounced by the Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawada. The case hinged on the testimony of a key witness, identified as PW1, who significantly altered his narrative during the trial, turning hostile and impacting the credibility of the prosecution’s case.

Justice Ravindra Babu noted, “The evidence of PW1, who turned hostile, shattered the case of the prosecution to any extent.” He further remarked on the unreliability of the witness, stating, “It is quietly evident that P.W.1 was not a reliable witness and his evidence cannot be a basis to sustain any conviction especially when he turned hostile to the case of the prosecution.”

The judgment also highlighted that the recovery of tainted money from the accused officer did not conclusively link him to the alleged demand for a bribe. The Court’s decision emphasized the importance of concrete evidence and reliable witness testimony in corruption cases.

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

State, rep. By Inspector of Police VS Sri Doddi Narasimha Rao

Latest Legal News