Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Key witness altered his Statement: High Court of Andhra Pradesh Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Against Municipal Officer

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh upheld the acquittal of Sri Doddi Narasimha Rao, a Tap Inspector with the Municipal Corporation of Guntur, in a bribery case. The case, filed under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, revolved around allegations of Rao demanding a bribe for installing a water tap connection.

In the detailed judgment, Hon’ble Justice A.V. Ravindra Babu observed, “The prosecution failed to establish foundational facts necessary to invoke presumption of guilt under Section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.” This observation was pivotal in determining the outcome of the case.

The appeal, filed by the State represented by the Inspector of Police, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Vijayawada Range, Guntur, challenged the initial acquittal verdict pronounced by the Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawada. The case hinged on the testimony of a key witness, identified as PW1, who significantly altered his narrative during the trial, turning hostile and impacting the credibility of the prosecution’s case.

Justice Ravindra Babu noted, “The evidence of PW1, who turned hostile, shattered the case of the prosecution to any extent.” He further remarked on the unreliability of the witness, stating, “It is quietly evident that P.W.1 was not a reliable witness and his evidence cannot be a basis to sustain any conviction especially when he turned hostile to the case of the prosecution.”

The judgment also highlighted that the recovery of tainted money from the accused officer did not conclusively link him to the alleged demand for a bribe. The Court’s decision emphasized the importance of concrete evidence and reliable witness testimony in corruption cases.

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

State, rep. By Inspector of Police VS Sri Doddi Narasimha Rao

Latest Legal News