Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     When Two Accused Face Identical Charges, One Cannot Be Convicted While the Other is Acquitted: Supreme Court Emphasizes Principle of Parity in Acquittal    |     Supreme Court Limits Interim Protection for Financial Institutions, Modifies Order on FIRs Filed by Borrowers    |     Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail in Methamphetamine Case After Delay in Chemical Analysis Report    |     No Sign of Recent Intercourse; No Injury Was Found On Her Body Or Private Parts: Gauhati High Court Acquits Two In Gang Rape Case    |     Failure to Disclose Relationship with Key Stakeholder Led to Setting Aside of Arbitral Award: Gujarat High Court    |     Strict Compliance with UAPA's 7-Day Timeline for Sanctions is Essential:  Supreme Court    |     PAT Teachers Entitled to Regularization from 2014, Quashes Prospective Regularization as Arbitrary: Himachal Pradesh High Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Anonymity Protections for Victims in Sensitive Cases: Right to Privacy Prevails Over Right to Information    |     Certified Copy of Will Admissible Under Registration Act, 1908: Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea for Production of Original Will    |     Injuries on Non-Vital Parts Do Not Warrant Conviction for Attempt to Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Modifies Conviction Under Section 307 IPC to Section 326 IPC    |     Classification Based on Wikipedia Data Inadmissible; Tribunal to Reassess Using Actual Financial Records: PH High Court Orders Reconsideration of Wage Dispute    |     Mere Delay in Initiation Does Not Justify Reduction of Damages: Jharkhand High Court on Provident Fund Defaults    |     Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     An Award that Shocks the Conscience of the Court Cannot Stand, Especially When Public Money is Involved: Calcutta HC Reduces Quantum by Half    |     Trademark Transaction Within Territoriality Principle Subject to Indian Tax Laws: Bombay High Court Dismisses Hindustan Unilever's Petition on Non-Deduction of TDS    |     Concealment of Material Facts Bars Relief under Article 226: SC Reprimands Petitioners for Lack of Bonafides    |     Without Determination of the Will's Genuineness, Partition is Impossible: Supreme Court on Liberal Approach to Pleading Amendments    |     Candidates Cannot Challenge a Selection Process After Participating Without Protest : Delhi High Court Upholds ISRO's Administrative Officer Recruitment    |     Invalid Bank Guarantee Invocation Found Fatal to Recovery Claim: Delhi High Court Dismisses GAIL’s Appeal    |     Adverse Remarks in APAR Recorded Without Objectivity and Likely Motivated by Bias: Delhi High Court Quashes Biased APAR Downgrade of CRPF Officer    |    

Key witness altered his Statement: High Court of Andhra Pradesh Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Against Municipal Officer

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh upheld the acquittal of Sri Doddi Narasimha Rao, a Tap Inspector with the Municipal Corporation of Guntur, in a bribery case. The case, filed under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, revolved around allegations of Rao demanding a bribe for installing a water tap connection.

In the detailed judgment, Hon’ble Justice A.V. Ravindra Babu observed, “The prosecution failed to establish foundational facts necessary to invoke presumption of guilt under Section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.” This observation was pivotal in determining the outcome of the case.

The appeal, filed by the State represented by the Inspector of Police, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Vijayawada Range, Guntur, challenged the initial acquittal verdict pronounced by the Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawada. The case hinged on the testimony of a key witness, identified as PW1, who significantly altered his narrative during the trial, turning hostile and impacting the credibility of the prosecution’s case.

Justice Ravindra Babu noted, “The evidence of PW1, who turned hostile, shattered the case of the prosecution to any extent.” He further remarked on the unreliability of the witness, stating, “It is quietly evident that P.W.1 was not a reliable witness and his evidence cannot be a basis to sustain any conviction especially when he turned hostile to the case of the prosecution.”

The judgment also highlighted that the recovery of tainted money from the accused officer did not conclusively link him to the alleged demand for a bribe. The Court’s decision emphasized the importance of concrete evidence and reliable witness testimony in corruption cases.

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

State, rep. By Inspector of Police VS Sri Doddi Narasimha Rao

Similar News