Inadequate Explanation Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Foundation For Conviction If Prosecution Fails To Prove Case: Allahabad High Court No-Confidence Motion In Housing Societies Fails If 2/3 Majority Not Met; Fractions In Voting Threshold Cannot Be Rounded Down: Bombay High Court Successor Rent Controller Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Or Act As Appellate Court Under Review Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Restores Eviction Order Article 21 Overrides PMLA Section 45 Rigors In Cases Of Unduly Long Incarceration Without Trial: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail To SSC Scam ‘Middleman’ Unregistered Family Partition Deed Recording Past Oral Arrangement Doesn't Require Compulsory Registration: Gujarat High Court Private Banks Acting As Authorised Dealers Under FEMA Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction; Can Refuse Transactions For 'Sanctions-Related' Concerns: Gauhati High Court Non-Examination Of Investigating Officer Not Fatal To Prosecution Case If Eyewitness Testimony Is Credible & Trustworthy: Jharkhand High Court Mere Denial Of Signature Insufficient When Execution Is Proved Through Endorsements: Karnataka High Court Restores Specific Performance Decree Sectarianism Claims Can't Discredit Reliable Testimony Of Child Sexual Abuse Victim: Kerala High Court Upholds Madrassa Teacher's Conviction State Must Prove Specific 'Public Interest' To Exempt Projects From Social Impact Assessment Under Section 10A Land Acquisition Act: Telangana High Court Or 2 Rule 2 CPC |Failure To Seek Specific Performance In Earlier Injunction Suit Bars Subsequent Claim; Readiness & Willingness Must Be Continuous: Madras High Court Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Does Not Result In Automatic Discharge In Criminal Case: Orissa High Court History Sheet Can Be Opened On 'Reasonable Belief' Even Without Conviction, But Must Be Reviewed After 7 Years Of Good Conduct: Rajasthan High Court

Key witness altered his Statement: High Court of Andhra Pradesh Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Against Municipal Officer

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh upheld the acquittal of Sri Doddi Narasimha Rao, a Tap Inspector with the Municipal Corporation of Guntur, in a bribery case. The case, filed under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, revolved around allegations of Rao demanding a bribe for installing a water tap connection.

In the detailed judgment, Hon’ble Justice A.V. Ravindra Babu observed, “The prosecution failed to establish foundational facts necessary to invoke presumption of guilt under Section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.” This observation was pivotal in determining the outcome of the case.

The appeal, filed by the State represented by the Inspector of Police, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Vijayawada Range, Guntur, challenged the initial acquittal verdict pronounced by the Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, Vijayawada. The case hinged on the testimony of a key witness, identified as PW1, who significantly altered his narrative during the trial, turning hostile and impacting the credibility of the prosecution’s case.

Justice Ravindra Babu noted, “The evidence of PW1, who turned hostile, shattered the case of the prosecution to any extent.” He further remarked on the unreliability of the witness, stating, “It is quietly evident that P.W.1 was not a reliable witness and his evidence cannot be a basis to sustain any conviction especially when he turned hostile to the case of the prosecution.”

The judgment also highlighted that the recovery of tainted money from the accused officer did not conclusively link him to the alleged demand for a bribe. The Court’s decision emphasized the importance of concrete evidence and reliable witness testimony in corruption cases.

Date of Decision: 21st November 2023

State, rep. By Inspector of Police VS Sri Doddi Narasimha Rao

Latest Legal News