Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

"Kerala High Court Sets Precedent: Victim's Right to Appeal Upheld in Landmark Judgment"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Kerala High Court, through the Honorable Justice C.S. Dias, has reaffirmed the rights of victims to appeal in criminal cases, setting a significant precedent in the Indian legal landscape. The judgment, delivered on the 6th of October, 2023, has far-reaching implications for victims seeking justice.

The case, Crl.R.P. No.1703 of 2013, involved a victim, Jyothi, who had filed an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The appeal was against an order of acquittal related to a case of assault by her husband. However, the appeal faced dismissal for default due to a lack of representation.

Justice C.S. Dias, in his comprehensive ruling, emphasized the importance of the victim's right to appeal against an order of acquittal and the need to ensure that this right is protected. He cited the case of Sobhanakumari K. v. Santhosh @ Pallan Shaji, which clarified that there is no specific time period stipulated for such appeals and that any delay should be explained through an affidavit.

Moreover, Justice Dias highlighted that the law, as laid down in Sobhanakumari.K, obliges the Appellate Court to hear the accused or appoint an Amicus Curiae if the accused is not represented. He cited cases such as K.Muruganandam & Ors v. Deputy Superintendent of Police and Anr and Dhananjay Rai @ Guddu Rai v. State of Bihar, which underscored that appeals should be decided on their merits rather than dismissed for default or non-prosecution.

In his concluding remarks, Justice Dias remarked, "The impugned orders are erroneous, improper, and irregular. Thus, I am inclined to allow the revision petition." The court set aside the orders in Crl.M.P No.2047/2013 and Crl.A No.254/2013, effectively restoring the case to the court's docket.

This judgment is poised to have a significant impact on ensuring victims' access to justice and protecting their right to appeal, even if there are delays in filing appeals. It underscores the judiciary's commitment to upholding the rights of victims and ensuring that their grievances are heard and considered in a fair and just manner.

Case Title: Jyothi v. State of Kerala

Date of Judgment: October 6, 2023

Similar News