Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

"Kerala High Court Sets Precedent: Victim's Right to Appeal Upheld in Landmark Judgment"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Kerala High Court, through the Honorable Justice C.S. Dias, has reaffirmed the rights of victims to appeal in criminal cases, setting a significant precedent in the Indian legal landscape. The judgment, delivered on the 6th of October, 2023, has far-reaching implications for victims seeking justice.

The case, Crl.R.P. No.1703 of 2013, involved a victim, Jyothi, who had filed an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The appeal was against an order of acquittal related to a case of assault by her husband. However, the appeal faced dismissal for default due to a lack of representation.

Justice C.S. Dias, in his comprehensive ruling, emphasized the importance of the victim's right to appeal against an order of acquittal and the need to ensure that this right is protected. He cited the case of Sobhanakumari K. v. Santhosh @ Pallan Shaji, which clarified that there is no specific time period stipulated for such appeals and that any delay should be explained through an affidavit.

Moreover, Justice Dias highlighted that the law, as laid down in Sobhanakumari.K, obliges the Appellate Court to hear the accused or appoint an Amicus Curiae if the accused is not represented. He cited cases such as K.Muruganandam & Ors v. Deputy Superintendent of Police and Anr and Dhananjay Rai @ Guddu Rai v. State of Bihar, which underscored that appeals should be decided on their merits rather than dismissed for default or non-prosecution.

In his concluding remarks, Justice Dias remarked, "The impugned orders are erroneous, improper, and irregular. Thus, I am inclined to allow the revision petition." The court set aside the orders in Crl.M.P No.2047/2013 and Crl.A No.254/2013, effectively restoring the case to the court's docket.

This judgment is poised to have a significant impact on ensuring victims' access to justice and protecting their right to appeal, even if there are delays in filing appeals. It underscores the judiciary's commitment to upholding the rights of victims and ensuring that their grievances are heard and considered in a fair and just manner.

Case Title: Jyothi v. State of Kerala

Date of Judgment: October 6, 2023

Latest Legal News