Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court

Kerala High Court Rejects Writ Petition Seeking Stay on 'The Kerala Story' Movie Release

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam has rejected a writ petition seeking to suspend the circulation of teaser and trailer of a movie called 'The Kerala Story' and to prohibit its exhibition. The petitioner had alleged that the movie contained derogatory remarks against a community and was based on incorrect and unverified facts, and its release would disrupt and destroy the secular fabric of society.

However, the court found that a competent statutory body, the Central Board of Film Certification, had examined the movie and found it suitable for public exhibition, after examining the movie in the context of the guidelines prescribed. The court further noted that the trailers did not contain anything offensive to any particular community as a whole.

The court also took note of the fact that the producers had published a disclaimer along with the movie, which specifically stated that the film had been fictionalized and was a dramatized version of events. The film does not claim accuracy or factuality of historic events. In view of the above, the court declined to pass an interim order restraining the respondents from exhibiting the film.

The court admitted the writ petitions and allowed the petitioners to prosecute their complaints before the relevant authorities. In one of the writ petitions, the petitioner had filed a complaint invoking Rule 32 of the Cinematograph (Certification) Rules before the Board. The court made it clear that the petitioner will be at liberty to prosecute the said complaint.

The bench comprising N. Nagaresh and Sophy Thomas, JJ. passed the order on May 5, 2023, after hearing the arguments of the learned counsel on either side.

THAMANNA SULTHANA

Versus

UOI ETC.

D.D.05 MAY 2023

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/kerala_movie1.pdf"]

Latest Legal News