Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Absence of Receipts No Barrier to Justice: Madras High Court Orders Theft Complaint Referral Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C Rajasthan High Court Emphasizes Rehabilitation, Grants Probation to 67-Year-Old Convicted of Kidnapping" P&H High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Advocate Renuka Chopra: “A Frustrated Outburst Amid Systemic Challenges” Kerala High Court Criticizes Irregularities in Sabarimala Melsanthi Selection, Orders Compliance with Guidelines Non-Payment of Rent Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust: Calcutta High Court Administrative Orders Cannot Override Terminated Contracts: Rajasthan High Court Affirms in Landmark Decision Minimum Wage Claims Must Be Resolved by Designated Authorities Under the Minimum Wages Act, Not the Labour Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court Madras High Court Confirms Equal Coparcenary Rights for Daughters, Emphasizes Ancestral Property Rights Home Station Preferences Upheld in Transfer Case: Kerala High Court Overrules Tribunal on Teachers' Transfer Policy Failure to Formally Request Cross-Examination Does Not Invalidate Assessment Order: Calcutta High Court

Keeping Vehicle Idle in Open Space Will Diminish Its Nature and Lose Its Value: Madras High Court Orders Release of Seized Vehicle

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, led by the Honourable Mr. Justice M. Dhandapani, has directed the release of a vehicle seized in connection with a liquor transportation case. The Court, in its order dated 19th January 2024, emphasised the detrimental effects of keeping a seized vehicle idle in open space, stating that it “will diminish its nature and lose its value.”

The case, Crl.R.C.(MD)No.37 of 2024, was filed by one Muneeswari against the State represented by the Inspector of Police, Dhanuskodi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. The petitioner’s vehicle, a Honda Dio Motor Bike bearing registration No. TN 65 AR 3560, was seized following its alleged use in the illegal transportation of liquor bottles, an offence under Section 4(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act.

The petitioner had initially approached the Trial Court for interim custody of the vehicle, citing the ongoing financial obligations and potential damage to the vehicle if kept unused. However, this application was rejected, leading to the filing of the Criminal Revision Case in the High Court.

In the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. P. Praveenkumar, argued that the vehicle was misused without the owner’s knowledge and pointed out the necessity to protect the vehicle from damage and fulfill financial commitments like EMI payments. The respondent, represented by Mr. A. Thiruvadi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the plea, noting that the vehicle was involved in ongoing confiscation proceedings.

Justice Dhandapani, in his judgment, referenced the decision of the Supreme Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, underscoring the importance of protecting property rights. The Court ordered the vehicle’s release on several conditions, including the execution of a personal bond of Rs. 10,000, production of the vehicle when required by the court or police, and an undertaking that the vehicle will not be used for illegal activities in the future.

Dated: 19th January 2024

Muneeswari VS State

 

Similar News