Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Keeping Vehicle Idle in Open Space Will Diminish Its Nature and Lose Its Value: Madras High Court Orders Release of Seized Vehicle

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, led by the Honourable Mr. Justice M. Dhandapani, has directed the release of a vehicle seized in connection with a liquor transportation case. The Court, in its order dated 19th January 2024, emphasised the detrimental effects of keeping a seized vehicle idle in open space, stating that it “will diminish its nature and lose its value.”

The case, Crl.R.C.(MD)No.37 of 2024, was filed by one Muneeswari against the State represented by the Inspector of Police, Dhanuskodi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. The petitioner’s vehicle, a Honda Dio Motor Bike bearing registration No. TN 65 AR 3560, was seized following its alleged use in the illegal transportation of liquor bottles, an offence under Section 4(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act.

The petitioner had initially approached the Trial Court for interim custody of the vehicle, citing the ongoing financial obligations and potential damage to the vehicle if kept unused. However, this application was rejected, leading to the filing of the Criminal Revision Case in the High Court.

In the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. P. Praveenkumar, argued that the vehicle was misused without the owner’s knowledge and pointed out the necessity to protect the vehicle from damage and fulfill financial commitments like EMI payments. The respondent, represented by Mr. A. Thiruvadi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the plea, noting that the vehicle was involved in ongoing confiscation proceedings.

Justice Dhandapani, in his judgment, referenced the decision of the Supreme Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, underscoring the importance of protecting property rights. The Court ordered the vehicle’s release on several conditions, including the execution of a personal bond of Rs. 10,000, production of the vehicle when required by the court or police, and an undertaking that the vehicle will not be used for illegal activities in the future.

Dated: 19th January 2024

Muneeswari VS State

 

Similar News