Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC

Keeping Vehicle Idle in Open Space Will Diminish Its Nature and Lose Its Value: Madras High Court Orders Release of Seized Vehicle

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, led by the Honourable Mr. Justice M. Dhandapani, has directed the release of a vehicle seized in connection with a liquor transportation case. The Court, in its order dated 19th January 2024, emphasised the detrimental effects of keeping a seized vehicle idle in open space, stating that it “will diminish its nature and lose its value.”

The case, Crl.R.C.(MD)No.37 of 2024, was filed by one Muneeswari against the State represented by the Inspector of Police, Dhanuskodi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. The petitioner’s vehicle, a Honda Dio Motor Bike bearing registration No. TN 65 AR 3560, was seized following its alleged use in the illegal transportation of liquor bottles, an offence under Section 4(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act.

The petitioner had initially approached the Trial Court for interim custody of the vehicle, citing the ongoing financial obligations and potential damage to the vehicle if kept unused. However, this application was rejected, leading to the filing of the Criminal Revision Case in the High Court.

In the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr. P. Praveenkumar, argued that the vehicle was misused without the owner’s knowledge and pointed out the necessity to protect the vehicle from damage and fulfill financial commitments like EMI payments. The respondent, represented by Mr. A. Thiruvadi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the plea, noting that the vehicle was involved in ongoing confiscation proceedings.

Justice Dhandapani, in his judgment, referenced the decision of the Supreme Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat, underscoring the importance of protecting property rights. The Court ordered the vehicle’s release on several conditions, including the execution of a personal bond of Rs. 10,000, production of the vehicle when required by the court or police, and an undertaking that the vehicle will not be used for illegal activities in the future.

Dated: 19th January 2024

Muneeswari VS State

 

Latest Legal News