Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Justice Not Merely for the Rich but for the Vulnerable: High Court of Karnataka Upholds Maintenance and Residence Rights under DV Act

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the High Court of Karnataka dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition No. 14 of 2019, filed by Sri B V Mohan Babu against Smt. Bhavya A, upholding the lower courts' rulings on maintenance and residence rights under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act).

The judgment addressed the critical issue of maintenance and residence rights under the DV Act. The petitioner contested the order by the LXXI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, which granted relief to the respondent, including a monthly maintenance of Rs. 25,000, 50% of the child's educational expenses, and protection against domestic violence.

The respondent claimed marriage in 2006 and payment of Rs. 5 lakh dowry. Allegations of domestic violence and harassment led to the DV Act petition and criminal cases under Sections 498A of IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial court concluded domestic violence and ordered the petitioner to provide maintenance and prohibit interference with the respondent's residence.

The High Court meticulously assessed each legal point. The Court observed, "When the respondent is residing in the matrimonial home after the marriage... and criminal case also initiated against the petitioner... the contention that he will take care of the respondent cannot be accepted." The Court highlighted the petitioner's income of Rs. 1,70,000/- per month in relation to the maintenance awarded. Emphasizing the limited scope of revision, the Court found no legal error in the Trial Court’s and First Appellate Court’s decisions regarding maintenance and residence rights under the DV Act.

The High Court dismissed the revision petition, affirming the decisions of the lower courts. The Court’s stance reinforces the protection of vulnerable sections under the DV Act, asserting that justice is not just for the affluent but also for those in need of protection and support.

Date of Decision: 28th February 2024

Sri B V Mohan Babu Vs. Smt. Bhavya A

Latest Legal News