TRAI Issuing Directions To Enforce Regulations Is Not 'Adjudication' Of Dispute, Does Not Usurp TDSAT's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Candidate Can Challenge Selection Process After Participating If Arbitrariness Is Writ Large Or Rules Changed Mid-Way: Supreme Court Selection Committee Cannot Superimpose Additional Cut-Off Marks Not Prescribed In Rules: Supreme Court Litigants Must Ordinarily Approach High Court First For Quashing FIRs, Article 32 Is For Exceptional Circumstances: Supreme Court Supreme Court Refuses To Club Multiple FIRs In Cyber Fraud Case, Says Similar Modus Operandi Does Not Constitute 'Same Transaction' Layman Borrowers Not Liable For Forgery If Even Bank's Legal Experts Failed To Detect Fabrication In Title Deeds: Allahabad High Court Kerala High Court Orders Travancore Devaswom Board To Digitise Sabarimala Asset Inventory, Says Current Records Resemble 'Betel Shop' Ledger Second Husband In Void Marriage Cannot Be Prosecuted For Dowry Death Under Section 80 BNS: Allahabad High Court Cohabitation Of Barely 3 Months Insufficient To Trigger Presumption Of Live-In Relationship For Maintenance: Bombay High Court SC/ST Act Case Filed By Suspended Head Constable To 'Wreck Vengeance' Against Investigating Officers Quashed: Andhra Pradesh High Court Non-Compliance With Order For Production Of Documents Under O.11 R.14 CPC Cannot Warrant Striking Off Defence: Calcutta High Court Omission To Put Dying Declaration To Accused Under Section 313 CrPC Makes It Inadmissible, But Doesn't Demolish Entire Prosecution Case: Delhi High Court Victim's Appeal Against Magistrate's Acquittal Order Lies Before Sessions Court Under Section 413 BNSS: Gujarat High Court 'Fraud And Justice Cannot Dwell Together': Karnataka High Court Quashes 30-Year-Old Land Acquisition After Records Of Compensation Go Missing Electricity Authorities Cannot Determine Civil Liability For Energy Theft Under Section 135; Only Special Court Empowered: Madhya Pradesh High Court State Cannot Exploit Employees By Keeping Them On Part-Time Basis For Decades To Deny Old Pension Scheme: Punjab & Haryana HC

Interim Bail Chandra Babbu Naidu on Medical Grounds: Preservation of Human Life is Paramount: Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, presided over by THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, has granted interim bail to a 73-year-old petitioner, who has been in judicial custody since September 10, 2023. The judgment, delivered on October 31, 2023, underscores the paramount importance of preserving human life, irrespective of the gravity of the alleged offense.

The petitioner, facing charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act, sought interim bail for medical examinations and treatment due to deteriorating health conditions. The Court, in its observation, emphasized the humanitarian aspect of the case, stating, "Preservation of human life is of paramount importance. Every individual has the inherent right to receive comprehensive and effective medical care."

The medical reports presented in the case highlighted the petitioner's fragile health condition, including Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy. These reports recommended a range of tests and imminent cataract surgery for the petitioner's right eye, emphasizing the inadequacy of medical supervision and facilities in jail.

While the State argued against the grant of interim bail, the Court recognized the petitioner's significant societal standing and noted that "a patient in need of medical attention should be granted immediate, effective, and comprehensive treatment." The Court firmly upheld the belief that individuals with serious health issues should have access to adequate medical treatment, even during the investigative phase.

In its judgment, the Court granted interim bail to the petitioner for four weeks, subject to certain conditions, including furnishing a bail bond and undergoing necessary medical examinations and treatment at a hospital of his choice. The Court stressed the importance of immediate medical attention, especially regarding the required cataract surgery.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the judiciary's commitment to upholding the right to life and ensuring access to healthcare for individuals in custody, emphasizing that "custody during the investigative phase should not be perceived as punitive." The Court's decision reflects the humanitarian principles that underpin the justice system, highlighting the value of preserving human life above all else.

Date of Decision: 31 October, 2023

Sri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu Vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh 

 

Latest Legal News