Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

Interim Bail Chandra Babbu Naidu on Medical Grounds: Preservation of Human Life is Paramount: Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, presided over by THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, has granted interim bail to a 73-year-old petitioner, who has been in judicial custody since September 10, 2023. The judgment, delivered on October 31, 2023, underscores the paramount importance of preserving human life, irrespective of the gravity of the alleged offense.

The petitioner, facing charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act, sought interim bail for medical examinations and treatment due to deteriorating health conditions. The Court, in its observation, emphasized the humanitarian aspect of the case, stating, "Preservation of human life is of paramount importance. Every individual has the inherent right to receive comprehensive and effective medical care."

The medical reports presented in the case highlighted the petitioner's fragile health condition, including Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy. These reports recommended a range of tests and imminent cataract surgery for the petitioner's right eye, emphasizing the inadequacy of medical supervision and facilities in jail.

While the State argued against the grant of interim bail, the Court recognized the petitioner's significant societal standing and noted that "a patient in need of medical attention should be granted immediate, effective, and comprehensive treatment." The Court firmly upheld the belief that individuals with serious health issues should have access to adequate medical treatment, even during the investigative phase.

In its judgment, the Court granted interim bail to the petitioner for four weeks, subject to certain conditions, including furnishing a bail bond and undergoing necessary medical examinations and treatment at a hospital of his choice. The Court stressed the importance of immediate medical attention, especially regarding the required cataract surgery.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the judiciary's commitment to upholding the right to life and ensuring access to healthcare for individuals in custody, emphasizing that "custody during the investigative phase should not be perceived as punitive." The Court's decision reflects the humanitarian principles that underpin the justice system, highlighting the value of preserving human life above all else.

Date of Decision: 31 October, 2023

Sri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu Vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh 

 

Latest Legal News