Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence: Chain of Circumstances Not Fully Established: Bombay High Court Acquits Two in 2009 Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, has acquitted two individuals, Dattatrao @ Bandu Vithalrao Sarje and Amol s/o Narayanrao Patange, in the 2009 murder case of Vishal Balwant Patange. The bench comprising R. G. Avachat and Neeraj P. Dhote, J., held that the prosecution failed to establish a conclusive chain of circumstantial evidence against the appellants.

The court observed, "The prosecution has failed to prove the circumstances so as to form a complete chain which would point towards guilt of the appellants." This observation was pivotal in the decision to overturn the earlier conviction and life sentence awarded by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli in Sessions Trial No. 45 of 2010.

The case, primarily resting on circumstantial evidence, raised significant questions regarding the 'last seen theory' and the discovery of the deceased’s belongings. The court critically analyzed the testimony of PW7 - Pralhad Bapusaheb Patange, who claimed to have seen the deceased last with the appellants. The bench found inconsistencies in the witness's testimony, noting, "In the light of this evidence of PW 1 - Balwant, the evidence of PW 7 - Pralhad Bapusaheb Patange regarding travelling of deceased Vishal in the Bus, is required to be seen with doubt."

Furthermore, the recovery of deceased Vishal’s belongings from open places did not conclusively link the appellants to the crime. The court added, "Though the said articles are identified by PW1 Balwant and PW8 Jayabai as that of deceased Vishal, it is strange how three (3) boots can be that of one person i.e., of deceased Vishal."

The judgment also upheld the trial court's acquittal of the co-accused, citing a lack of conclusive evidence against them. The bench remarked on the acquittal applications filed by the State and PW1 Balwant, "Sans evidence against the co-accused, the learned Trial Court has rightly acquitted the co-accused."

Date of Decision: 30 January 2024

Dattatrao @ Bandu Vithalrao Sarje VS The State of Maharashtra

 

Latest Legal News