Detailed Description Of Concealment Not Mandatory Under Section 27 Evidence Act: Bombay High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Child Is Not A Pawn To Prove Mother's Adultery: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Husband's DNA Test Petition In Desertion Divorce Case Shareholder Ratification Cannot Cure Fraud Under SEBI's PFUTP Regulations: Supreme Court Restores Rs. 70 Lakh Penalty on Company When High Court Judges Themselves Disagree on the Answer, Can a Law Graduate Be Penalised for Getting It Wrong? Supreme Court Says No Superficial Burns Don't Mean Silence: Supreme Court Explains Why 80-90% Burn Victim Could Still Make a Valid Dying Declaration Daughter's Eyewitness Account, Dying Declaration Seal Husband's Fate: Supreme Court Upholds Life Sentence for Wife-Burning Murder Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 106 Crore Compensation Claim; Directs SECL to Supply Coal to Prakash Industries at 2014 or 2019 Prices for Wrongfully Suspended Period Section 319 CrPC | Trial Court Cannot Conduct Mini Trial While Deciding Application to Summon Additional Accused: Supreme Court Accused Can't Be Left Without Documents To Defend: Calcutta High Court Directs Adjudicating Authority To First Decide Whether Complete 'Relied Upon Documents' Were Served In PMLA Proceedings Husband Who Took Voluntary Retirement at 47 Cannot Escape Maintenance Duty: Delhi High Court Upholds ₹10,000/Month to Wife and Daughter Cannot Claim Monopoly Over a Deity's Name: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Trademark Injunction Against 'Kshetrapal Construction' Eviction Appeal Cannot Require Actual Surrender Of Possession, Symbolic Possession Sufficient: J&K High Court Amendment Introducing Time-Barred Relief And Changing Nature Of Suit Cannot Be Allowed: Karnataka High Court Counter Claim Is An Independent Suit: MP High Court Rules Properties Beyond Territorial Jurisdiction Cannot Be Dragged Into Counter Claim Co-Sharer Cannot Be Bound By Passage Carved Out Without His Consent: Punjab & Haryana High Court Modifies Concurrent Decrees ‘Prima Facie True’ Is Enough to Deny Liberty: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses Bail in Babbar Khalsa Terror Conspiracy Case High Court Cannot Quash FIR for Forgery When Handwriting Expert's Report Is Still Awaited: Supreme Court Supreme Court Calls for Paternity Leave Law, Says Father's Absence in Child's Early Years Leaves a "Quiet Cost" That Lasts a Lifetime Three-Month Age Cap for Adoptive Mothers' Maternity Benefit Struck Down: Supreme Court Reads Down Section 60(4) of Social Security Code Bank Cannot Rely on Charter Party Agreement to Justify Remittance Contrary to Customer's Instructions: Supreme Court 19 Candidates Linked to Accused, Papers of Five Subjects Leaked: Allahabad High Court Upholds Cancellation of UP Assistant Professor Exam Result

In the Absence of Formal Notice, Arbitration Cannot be Invoked: Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on the procedural requisites for initiating arbitration, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed an arbitration application due to non-compliance with the formal notice requirements stipulated under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Legal Point: The court’s decision centered on the application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the necessity of fulfilling contractual obligations for notice before arbitration can be rightfully invoked.

Facts and Issues: M/s Shree Swaminarayan Travels sought to resolve disputes arising from a transportation services contract with Oil Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), claiming dues amounting to over 65 lakh rupees. The applicant argued that despite reaching out for dispute resolution through an Outside Expert Committee, no formal arbitration notice was issued as per the contractual agreement following the 60-day dispute notice period, leading to their application for appointing an independent arbitrator.

Contractual Compliance: Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur emphasized the contractual requirement that an arbitration clause can only be invoked after issuing a formal notice upon the expiry of the 60-day dispute period as per the agreement. “The conditions of the agreement clearly necessitated a formal notice for invoking arbitration which was unfortunately overlooked,” observed the Chief Justice.

Procedural Integrity: The court highlighted that adherence to the agreed dispute resolution mechanism is paramount. “Parties are bound by the terms they have agreed upon, and courts expect strict compliance before judicial intervention is considered,” Justice Thakur added.

Legal Precedents: Referencing the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. M/S Nortel Networks India Pvt. Ltd., the court reiterated that the application under Section 11 can only proceed once it is established that the arbitration notice has been properly served and there was a failure in appointment as per the arbitration clause.

Decision: The High Court dismissed the application for the appointment of an arbitrator, citing the absence of a formal notice as fatal to the applicant’s plea. The applicant was granted liberty to re-apply following the correct procedural format as outlined in their contract.

Date of Decision: May 10, 2024

M/s Shree Swaminarayan Travels vs. M/s Oil Natural Gas Corporation Limited

Latest Legal News