High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Denies Tax Refund for Hybrid Vehicle Purchased Before Electric Vehicle Exemption Policy Entering A Room with Someone Cannot, By Any Stretch Of Imagination, Be Considered Consent For Sexual Intercourse: Bombay High Court No Specific Format Needed for Dying Declaration, Focus on Mental State and Voluntariness: Calcutta High Court Delhi High Court Allows Direct Appeal Under DVAT Act Without Tribunal Reference for Pre-2005 Tax Periods NDPS | Mere Registration of Cases Does Not Override Presumption of Innocence: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Previous Antecedents and No Communal Tension: High Court Grants Bail in Caste-Based Abuse Case Detention of Petitioner Would Amount to Pre-Trial Punishment: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail in Dowry Harassment Case Loss of Confidence Must Be Objectively Proven to Deny Reinstatement: Kerala High Court Reinstates Workman After Flawed Domestic Enquiry Procedural lapses should not deny justice: Andhra High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case Canteen Subsidy Constitutes Part of Dearness Allowance Under EPF Act: Gujarat High Court Concurrent Findings Demonstrate Credibility – Jharkhand High Court Affirms Conviction in Cheating Case 125 Cr.P.C | Financial responsibility towards dependents cannot be shirked due to personal obligations: Punjab and Haryana High Court Mere Acceptance of Money Without Proof of Demand is Not Sufficient to Establish Corruption Charges Gujrat High Court Evidence Insufficient to Support Claims: Orissa High Court Affirms Appellate Court’s Reversal in Wrongful Confinement and Defamation Case Harmonious Interpretation of PWDV Act and Senior Citizens Act is Crucial: Kerala High Court in Domestic Violence Case

In the Absence of Formal Notice, Arbitration Cannot be Invoked: Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on the procedural requisites for initiating arbitration, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed an arbitration application due to non-compliance with the formal notice requirements stipulated under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Legal Point: The court’s decision centered on the application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing the necessity of fulfilling contractual obligations for notice before arbitration can be rightfully invoked.

Facts and Issues: M/s Shree Swaminarayan Travels sought to resolve disputes arising from a transportation services contract with Oil Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), claiming dues amounting to over 65 lakh rupees. The applicant argued that despite reaching out for dispute resolution through an Outside Expert Committee, no formal arbitration notice was issued as per the contractual agreement following the 60-day dispute notice period, leading to their application for appointing an independent arbitrator.

Contractual Compliance: Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur emphasized the contractual requirement that an arbitration clause can only be invoked after issuing a formal notice upon the expiry of the 60-day dispute period as per the agreement. “The conditions of the agreement clearly necessitated a formal notice for invoking arbitration which was unfortunately overlooked,” observed the Chief Justice.

Procedural Integrity: The court highlighted that adherence to the agreed dispute resolution mechanism is paramount. “Parties are bound by the terms they have agreed upon, and courts expect strict compliance before judicial intervention is considered,” Justice Thakur added.

Legal Precedents: Referencing the case of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd v. M/S Nortel Networks India Pvt. Ltd., the court reiterated that the application under Section 11 can only proceed once it is established that the arbitration notice has been properly served and there was a failure in appointment as per the arbitration clause.

Decision: The High Court dismissed the application for the appointment of an arbitrator, citing the absence of a formal notice as fatal to the applicant’s plea. The applicant was granted liberty to re-apply following the correct procedural format as outlined in their contract.

Date of Decision: May 10, 2024

M/s Shree Swaminarayan Travels vs. M/s Oil Natural Gas Corporation Limited

Similar News