Court Must Conduct Inquiry on Mental Competency Before Appointing Legal Guardian - Punjab and Haryana High Court Right to Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due to the Sentiments of Society: Kerala High Court Grants Bail in Eve Teasing Case Supreme Court Extends Probation to 70-Year-Old in Decades-Old Family Feud Case Authorized Railway Agents Cannot Be Criminally Prosecuted for Unauthorized Procurement And Supply Of Railway Tickets: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Arbitrarily: Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Accused For Valid Arbitration Agreement and Party Consent Necessary: Supreme Court Declares Ex-Parte Arbitration Awards Null and Void NDPS | Lack of Homogeneous Mixing, Inventory Preparation, and Magistrate Certification Fatal to Prosecution's Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court "May Means May, and Shall Means Shall": Supreme Court Clarifies Appellate Court's Discretion Under Section 148 of NI Act Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Re-Evaluation of Coal Block Tender, Cites Concerns Over Arbitrary Disqualification Dying Declarations Must Be Beyond Doubt to Sustain Convictions: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Burn Injury Murder Case No Legally Enforceable Debt Proven: Madras High Court Dismisses Petition for Special Leave to Appeal in Cheque Bounce Case Decisional Autonomy is a Core Part of the Right to Privacy : Kerala High Court Upholds LGBTQ+ Rights in Landmark Habeas Corpus Case Consent of a Minor Is No Defense Under the POCSO Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Well-Known Marks Demand Special Protection: Delhi HC Cancels Conflicting Trademark for RPG Industrial Products High Court Acquits Accused Due to ‘Golden Thread’ Principle: Gaps in Medical Evidence and Unexplained Time Frame Prove Decisive Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown; Awards ₹12 Crore Permanent Alimony Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary

In Contracts, Payment Period Cannot Exceed 120 Days from Acceptance - Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has clarified the applicability of the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993, emphasizing the limitation on payment terms between buyers and suppliers.

Legal Point of Judgement: Interpretation of Payment Terms Under the 1993 Act

The bench, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, dealt with the complexities surrounding Sections 2(b), (c), (f), 3, 4, 5 of the 1993 Act. The crux of the matter hinged on interpreting the maximum permissible payment period in contracts and the initiation of interest on delayed payments.

Facts and Issues: Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Limited vs Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd.

In this civil appeal, Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Limited (SSPL) challenged the arbitral award set aside by the High Court in favor of Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. (MSSIDCL). The primary issue revolved around the agreed payment terms and the calculation of interest on delayed payments as stipulated by the 1993 Act.

Court's Detailed Assessment:

120-Day Payment Limit: The court held that any agreement between a supplier and a buyer must adhere to a maximum payment term of 120 days from the date of acceptance or deemed acceptance, as per the proviso to Section 3 of the Act.

Definition Clarity: The court underscored the importance of definitions such as 'appointed day', 'buyer', and 'supplier' within the 1993 Act for calculating interest on delayed payments.

Compound Interest Considerations: The Court raised the need for clarity on whether compounded interest under Section 5 of the Act should be treated as principal for future interest calculations.

Restitution and Enforcement of Security: MSSIDCL's entitlement to enforce security or seek restitution under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was affirmed.

Decision of the Court: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, maintaining the High Court's decision to set aside the arbitral award. The court directed further proceedings to determine the facts relevant to the date of acceptance or deemed acceptance for interest calculation under the 1993 Act.

Date of Decision : March 5, 2024.

Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Limited vs Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. -

Similar News