"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

In Contracts, Payment Period Cannot Exceed 120 Days from Acceptance - Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has clarified the applicability of the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993, emphasizing the limitation on payment terms between buyers and suppliers.

Legal Point of Judgement: Interpretation of Payment Terms Under the 1993 Act

The bench, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, dealt with the complexities surrounding Sections 2(b), (c), (f), 3, 4, 5 of the 1993 Act. The crux of the matter hinged on interpreting the maximum permissible payment period in contracts and the initiation of interest on delayed payments.

Facts and Issues: Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Limited vs Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd.

In this civil appeal, Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Limited (SSPL) challenged the arbitral award set aside by the High Court in favor of Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. (MSSIDCL). The primary issue revolved around the agreed payment terms and the calculation of interest on delayed payments as stipulated by the 1993 Act.

Court's Detailed Assessment:

120-Day Payment Limit: The court held that any agreement between a supplier and a buyer must adhere to a maximum payment term of 120 days from the date of acceptance or deemed acceptance, as per the proviso to Section 3 of the Act.

Definition Clarity: The court underscored the importance of definitions such as 'appointed day', 'buyer', and 'supplier' within the 1993 Act for calculating interest on delayed payments.

Compound Interest Considerations: The Court raised the need for clarity on whether compounded interest under Section 5 of the Act should be treated as principal for future interest calculations.

Restitution and Enforcement of Security: MSSIDCL's entitlement to enforce security or seek restitution under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was affirmed.

Decision of the Court: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, maintaining the High Court's decision to set aside the arbitral award. The court directed further proceedings to determine the facts relevant to the date of acceptance or deemed acceptance for interest calculation under the 1993 Act.

Date of Decision : March 5, 2024.

Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Limited vs Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. -

Similar News