Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

In Contracts, Payment Period Cannot Exceed 120 Days from Acceptance - Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has clarified the applicability of the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993, emphasizing the limitation on payment terms between buyers and suppliers.

Legal Point of Judgement: Interpretation of Payment Terms Under the 1993 Act

The bench, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, dealt with the complexities surrounding Sections 2(b), (c), (f), 3, 4, 5 of the 1993 Act. The crux of the matter hinged on interpreting the maximum permissible payment period in contracts and the initiation of interest on delayed payments.

Facts and Issues: Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Limited vs Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd.

In this civil appeal, Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Limited (SSPL) challenged the arbitral award set aside by the High Court in favor of Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. (MSSIDCL). The primary issue revolved around the agreed payment terms and the calculation of interest on delayed payments as stipulated by the 1993 Act.

Court's Detailed Assessment:

120-Day Payment Limit: The court held that any agreement between a supplier and a buyer must adhere to a maximum payment term of 120 days from the date of acceptance or deemed acceptance, as per the proviso to Section 3 of the Act.

Definition Clarity: The court underscored the importance of definitions such as 'appointed day', 'buyer', and 'supplier' within the 1993 Act for calculating interest on delayed payments.

Compound Interest Considerations: The Court raised the need for clarity on whether compounded interest under Section 5 of the Act should be treated as principal for future interest calculations.

Restitution and Enforcement of Security: MSSIDCL's entitlement to enforce security or seek restitution under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was affirmed.

Decision of the Court: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, maintaining the High Court's decision to set aside the arbitral award. The court directed further proceedings to determine the facts relevant to the date of acceptance or deemed acceptance for interest calculation under the 1993 Act.

Date of Decision : March 5, 2024.

Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Limited vs Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. -

Latest Legal News