Mere Unwanted Staring At A Woman's Chest In Office Does Not Constitute Voyeurism Under Section 354-C IPC: Bombay High Court State Cannot Justify Espionage FIR Based Solely On Custodial Disclosure Without Corroborative Evidence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail Mere Issuance Of Letter Of Intent Without Formal Work Order Does Not Create Concluded Contract Or Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court Executing Court Cannot Modify Terms Of Compromise Decree Merely Because Implementation Is Impracticable: Supreme Court Adjudicating Authority Only Needs To Check For 'Plausible' Pre-Existing Dispute Under Section 9 IBC, Not Its Success On Merits: Supreme Court Arguing Against Settled Law To Show Skill Wastes Court Time; Giving Up Such Arguments A Professional Virtue: Supreme Court Limitation Under Section 468 CrPC Is Computed From Date Of Filing Complaint, Not Date Of Cognizance: Supreme Court MSCS Act | Co-operative Society Can't Acquire Corporate Debtor Under IBC If Not In 'Same Line Of Business' As Per Its Bye-Laws: Supreme Court Multi-State Co-op Societies Can Only Invest In Entities With Substantially Similar Core Business Under Bye-Laws: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Usurp Governor's Statutory Discretion To Grant Extraordinary Pension Under 1981 Rules: Supreme Court Litigants Can Challenge Non-Appealable Interlocutory Orders In Final Appeal Under Section 105 CPC: Supreme Court Plaintiff Cannot File Fresh Suit For Title If Relief Was Omitted In Earlier Injunction Suit Arising From Same Dispute: Supreme Court Plaintiff's Failure To Enter Witness Box Draws Rebuttable Presumption, Not Fatal To Suit If Rebutted By Cogent Evidence: Supreme Court Sale Deeds Executed During Pendency Of Specific Performance Suit Hit By Doctrine Of Lis Pendens: Supreme Court EWS Certificates Must Relate To Correct Financial Year; Courts Should Not Routinely Interfere In Online Recruitment Rejections: Supreme Court Court Can Lift 'Veil Of Partnership' To Evict Tenants Using Reconstitution As Cloak For Unlawful Sub-Letting: Supreme Court State Cannot Fix Lower Dearness Relief Rate For Pensioners Than Dearness Allowance For Serving Employees: Supreme Court Prolonged Separation Indicates Matrimonial Bond Broken Beyond Repair: Supreme Court Upholds Divorce Over Wife's Cruelty Right To Contest Elections Distinct From Right To Vote, Co-Operative Societies Can Set Threshold Eligibility Conditions: Supreme Court Court Can Draw Adverse Inference Against Party Withholding Best Evidence, Has No Duty To Seek Production: Supreme Court Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court

In Contracts, Payment Period Cannot Exceed 120 Days from Acceptance - Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has clarified the applicability of the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993, emphasizing the limitation on payment terms between buyers and suppliers.

Legal Point of Judgement: Interpretation of Payment Terms Under the 1993 Act

The bench, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta, dealt with the complexities surrounding Sections 2(b), (c), (f), 3, 4, 5 of the 1993 Act. The crux of the matter hinged on interpreting the maximum permissible payment period in contracts and the initiation of interest on delayed payments.

Facts and Issues: Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Limited vs Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd.

In this civil appeal, Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Limited (SSPL) challenged the arbitral award set aside by the High Court in favor of Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. (MSSIDCL). The primary issue revolved around the agreed payment terms and the calculation of interest on delayed payments as stipulated by the 1993 Act.

Court's Detailed Assessment:

120-Day Payment Limit: The court held that any agreement between a supplier and a buyer must adhere to a maximum payment term of 120 days from the date of acceptance or deemed acceptance, as per the proviso to Section 3 of the Act.

Definition Clarity: The court underscored the importance of definitions such as 'appointed day', 'buyer', and 'supplier' within the 1993 Act for calculating interest on delayed payments.

Compound Interest Considerations: The Court raised the need for clarity on whether compounded interest under Section 5 of the Act should be treated as principal for future interest calculations.

Restitution and Enforcement of Security: MSSIDCL's entitlement to enforce security or seek restitution under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was affirmed.

Decision of the Court: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, maintaining the High Court's decision to set aside the arbitral award. The court directed further proceedings to determine the facts relevant to the date of acceptance or deemed acceptance for interest calculation under the 1993 Act.

Date of Decision : March 5, 2024.

Snehadeep Structures Pvt. Limited vs Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation Ltd. -

Latest Legal News