Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |    

Immediate Parole Application Post-Furlough Contravenes Rule 1212: Delhi HC Upholds Prison Regulations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Delhi upheld stringent prison rules in the dismissal of a parole petition filed by Jeet Dahiya, emphasizing adherence to Rule 1212 of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, which mandates a one-month gap between furlough and parole applications.

Presiding Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma rejected the plea under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, stating that no sufficient grounds were presented to override the established prison guidelines. Convicted under severe charges including murder and illegal possession of arms, Dahiya sought parole to manage domestic responsibilities due to his wife’s engagement with her ailing mother.

Lodged in Central Jail No. 3, Tihar, Dahiya had recently benefited from a furlough ending on April 26, 2024, and subsequently applied for parole. The petition was grounded on the need to care for his minor children during his wife’s absence. The court, however, found this arrangement unnecessary as other family members were available to fulfill these roles.

Justice Sharma meticulously examined the conditions surrounding the parole request, emphasizing the violation of the prison rules meant to regulate the frequency of leaves granted to convicts. “As per Rule 1212 of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, there has to be at least one month gap between parole and last furlough availed and vice versa,” the judge noted, establishing the basis for the petition’s dismissal.

Conclusion The decision highlights the judiciary’s firm stance on maintaining order and discipline within the penal system through strict compliance with procedural norms. This case serves as a precedent for future instances where convicts might seek similar relief under the prison rules.

Date of Decision: May 10, 2024

JEET DAHIYA vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Similar News