Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix, If Credible, Is Enough to Convict: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Cheque Issued as Security Still Attracts Section 138 NI Act If Liability Exists on Date of Presentation: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Immediate Medical Assistance is Necessary for Students Spending Substantial Time on Campus: Bombay High Court

05 November 2024 5:15 PM

By: sayum


The Bombay High Court has mandated improved medical facilities in educational institutions throughout Maharashtra, stressing the critical need for immediate medical assistance on campuses. This directive came in response to a tragic incident involving a student's death, which raised serious concerns about the adequacy of medical provisions in educational institutes.

Surekha Luxman Sonovane filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and several educational and medical institutions following the untimely death of her daughter, Tejuswini. A final-year diploma student at Thakur Polytechnic College, Kandivali, Tejuswini collapsed in her classroom on February 22, 2016, and succumbed to a hemorrhage after being transported to nearby hospitals. The petitioner alleged that the college lacked adequate medical facilities, which delayed critical care that might have saved her daughter's life. She sought stringent action against the educational institution and hospitals involved, alongside a compensation claim of Rs. 50 lakhs.

The court, presided over by Justices Nitin Jamdar and M.M. Sathaye, highlighted the significant role of educational institutes in ensuring the health and safety of their students. The judgment underscored that institutes, particularly in larger cities, must be equipped to handle medical emergencies due to the considerable amount of time students spend away from home.

"The issue raised by the Petitioner of providing first aid and medical facilities in educational Institutes such as polytechnics is of importance," the bench noted, emphasizing the necessity of structured medical arrangements rather than ad-hoc responses during emergencies​​.

The court acknowledged the State Government's powers to issue mandates to educational institutions. The directives were outlined in a circular issued by the Higher and Technical Education Department on July 10, 2024, requiring colleges to establish first aid cum sick rooms, ensure the availability of first aid kits, and organize medical training camps. Additionally, institutions must display emergency contact information and collaborate with local doctors for on-call services​​.

The court noted that the writ jurisdiction did not permit adjudication of disputed factual issues, such as determining the deceased's preexisting conditions or attributing negligence to the college or hospitals. These matters fall under tort law, and the court refrained from granting relief for damages within the writ petition​​.

The judgment stressed the need for monitoring compliance with the newly issued circular. It directed the Higher and Technical Education Department to specify consequences for non-compliance and establish mechanisms to ensure the effective implementation of medical facilities in educational institutes. A helpline and social media presence were also recommended to allow students, parents, and staff to report deficiencies directly to the authorities​​.

The Bombay High Court's directive marks a pivotal step toward ensuring the health and safety of students across Maharashtra. By mandating comprehensive medical facilities and structured emergency responses in educational institutions, the court has addressed a critical gap in the current system. This judgment is expected to set a precedent for similar cases, reinforcing the legal framework to protect students' well-being.

Date of Decision: July 12, 2024

Surekha Luxman Sonovane vs. State of Maharashtra

Latest Legal News