High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Denies Tax Refund for Hybrid Vehicle Purchased Before Electric Vehicle Exemption Policy Entering A Room with Someone Cannot, By Any Stretch Of Imagination, Be Considered Consent For Sexual Intercourse: Bombay High Court No Specific Format Needed for Dying Declaration, Focus on Mental State and Voluntariness: Calcutta High Court Delhi High Court Allows Direct Appeal Under DVAT Act Without Tribunal Reference for Pre-2005 Tax Periods NDPS | Mere Registration of Cases Does Not Override Presumption of Innocence: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Previous Antecedents and No Communal Tension: High Court Grants Bail in Caste-Based Abuse Case Detention of Petitioner Would Amount to Pre-Trial Punishment: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail in Dowry Harassment Case Loss of Confidence Must Be Objectively Proven to Deny Reinstatement: Kerala High Court Reinstates Workman After Flawed Domestic Enquiry Procedural lapses should not deny justice: Andhra High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case Canteen Subsidy Constitutes Part of Dearness Allowance Under EPF Act: Gujarat High Court Concurrent Findings Demonstrate Credibility – Jharkhand High Court Affirms Conviction in Cheating Case 125 Cr.P.C | Financial responsibility towards dependents cannot be shirked due to personal obligations: Punjab and Haryana High Court Mere Acceptance of Money Without Proof of Demand is Not Sufficient to Establish Corruption Charges Gujrat High Court Evidence Insufficient to Support Claims: Orissa High Court Affirms Appellate Court’s Reversal in Wrongful Confinement and Defamation Case Harmonious Interpretation of PWDV Act and Senior Citizens Act is Crucial: Kerala High Court in Domestic Violence Case

Humanitarian Grounds Must Prevail Over Strict Compliance: Delhi High Court Grants Interim Bail To Money Laundering Accused

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court today granted interim bail to Daud Nasir, a petitioner involved in a money laundering case linked to the Delhi Waqf Board. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma emphasized the importance of humanitarian considerations, stating, “Humanitarian grounds must prevail over strict compliance,” when addressing the medical needs of Nasir’s family.

The court deliberated on the application for interim bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. linked to offenses under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). This case particularly highlights the judicial approach to balancing stringent statutory requirements against pressing humanitarian needs.

Nasir sought bail citing urgent medical and care needs for his wife who required surgery following a severe accident and their young child. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) opposed the bail, citing risks of evidence tampering and influence over witnesses, emphasizing Nasir’s alleged role in a larger conspiracy of money laundering involving irregular appointments and transactions within the Delhi Waqf Board.

Family Support and Applicant’s Role: Despite the respondent’s claim that Nasir’s joint family could care for his wife, the court recognized the distinct need for his presence during his wife’s surgery due to emotional and financial support considerations.

Compliance with Legal Standards: The court navigated the complexities of Section 45 of the PMLA which sets stringent conditions for bail in money laundering cases. However, it prioritized humanitarian needs given the specific circumstances of the case.

Conditions for Bail: Stringent conditions were imposed to ensure Nasir’s compliance with legal proceedings and minimize the risk of interference. These included restrictions on movement, mandatory communication with the investigating officer, and a clear stipulation against extending the bail period beyond the immediate medical needs of his wife.

Decision: The court granted Nasir interim bail for 15 days, subject to verification of the surgery date and adherence to several stringent conditions aimed at ensuring his presence does not obstruct the ongoing investigation or trial processes.

Date of Decision: May 10, 2024

Daud Nasir vs. Directorate of Enforcement

Similar News