Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Humanistic Approach Prevails: High Court Grants Probation to First-Time Offender in Assault Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling emphasizing the reformative aspect of criminal justice, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, led by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary, granted probation to Pardeep Kumar, a first-time offender convicted in an assault case. The judgment resonated with the principle of reformation, stating, "Humanistically viewing, the appellants having suffered the ignominy of trial since long... deserve to be granted an opportunity to assure the authorities of their reformation."

Legal Point of the Judgement: The court primarily deliberated on the applicability of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, focusing on the circumstances under which an offender can be released on probation of good conduct instead of serving a prison sentence.

Facts and Issues: Pardeep Kumar was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari, for offenses under Sections 333, 332, 353, and 186 IPC, following an altercation with a bus conductor and driver. He was sentenced to various terms of rigorous imprisonment, all running concurrently. The primary issue was whether Kumar, as a first-time offender with a family to support, should be granted the benefit of probation.

Court Assessment and Observations: The High Court, after perusing the evidence and considering the submissions, affirmed the conviction. However, it diverged on the sentence, referencing several precedents, including Ratan Lal vs. State of Punjab and Sitaram Paswan vs. State of Bihar, to underscore the reformative intent of the law. Justice Chaudhary observed, "Whilst society has a right to a peaceful life... a civilised society cannot be achieved only through punitive attitudes."

Legal Principles and Law: The court relied heavily on the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, which allows for the release of offenders on probation, considering the nature of the offense and the character of the offender. The Act's objective, as noted in past Supreme Court judgments, is more toward reforming the offender rather than punitive retribution.

Decision of Judgement: The Court, balancing the need for societal peace and individual reformation, ordered the release of Pardeep Kumar on probation for one year, subject to conditions like executing a bond for good behavior and being under the supervision of a Probation Officer.

Date of Decision: 30.01.2024.

Pardeep Kumar vs. State of Haryana

 

Latest Legal News