Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Humanistic Approach Prevails: High Court Grants Probation to First-Time Offender in Assault Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling emphasizing the reformative aspect of criminal justice, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, led by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary, granted probation to Pardeep Kumar, a first-time offender convicted in an assault case. The judgment resonated with the principle of reformation, stating, "Humanistically viewing, the appellants having suffered the ignominy of trial since long... deserve to be granted an opportunity to assure the authorities of their reformation."

Legal Point of the Judgement: The court primarily deliberated on the applicability of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, focusing on the circumstances under which an offender can be released on probation of good conduct instead of serving a prison sentence.

Facts and Issues: Pardeep Kumar was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari, for offenses under Sections 333, 332, 353, and 186 IPC, following an altercation with a bus conductor and driver. He was sentenced to various terms of rigorous imprisonment, all running concurrently. The primary issue was whether Kumar, as a first-time offender with a family to support, should be granted the benefit of probation.

Court Assessment and Observations: The High Court, after perusing the evidence and considering the submissions, affirmed the conviction. However, it diverged on the sentence, referencing several precedents, including Ratan Lal vs. State of Punjab and Sitaram Paswan vs. State of Bihar, to underscore the reformative intent of the law. Justice Chaudhary observed, "Whilst society has a right to a peaceful life... a civilised society cannot be achieved only through punitive attitudes."

Legal Principles and Law: The court relied heavily on the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, which allows for the release of offenders on probation, considering the nature of the offense and the character of the offender. The Act's objective, as noted in past Supreme Court judgments, is more toward reforming the offender rather than punitive retribution.

Decision of Judgement: The Court, balancing the need for societal peace and individual reformation, ordered the release of Pardeep Kumar on probation for one year, subject to conditions like executing a bond for good behavior and being under the supervision of a Probation Officer.

Date of Decision: 30.01.2024.

Pardeep Kumar vs. State of Haryana

 

Latest Legal News