Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Review Petition for Failure to Raise Grievances Timely

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed a review petition, citing the petitioners’ failure to raise their grievances at the appropriate stage of the litigation. The bench comprising of Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua and Justice Satyen Vaidya delivered the ruling on 31st May 2023.

The review petition challenged the validity of an office communication issued by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, H.P., which was earlier upheld by a learned Single Judge. The petitioners argued that the communication violated statutory Recruitment & Promotion Rules. However, the High Court observed that the review petitioners were not necessary parties before the writ court or the appellate court.

Justice Satyen Vaidya, in the judgment, stated, “In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the review petition on behalf of the review petitioners is not maintainable and the same is accordingly dismissed.” The court further highlighted that the petitioners had been aware of the proceedings, including the pending appeals, but chose not to raise their grievances earlier, terming their conduct as lacking objectivity.

The Court emphasized the importance of fairness in the judicial process, stating, “Litigation should not be used as a game of hide and seek.” The bench further noted that the silence maintained by the review petitioners throughout the litigation process led to the dismissal of their petition.

This judgment reinforces the principle that parties in a legal dispute must actively participate and raise their concerns at the appropriate stages of the litigation. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of subsequent review petitions.

Decided on : 31-05-2023

BANDANA KUMARI AND OTHERS vs STATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/31-May-23-BANDANA-KUMARI-Vs-State-Himachal-Pradesh-HC-1.pdf"]

 

Latest Legal News